Decoding smil test 566 questions. The Luscher color test is also aimed at studying a person’s personal characteristics and assessing his emotional state

Subscribe
Join the “koon.ru” community!
In contact with:

MINNESOTA MULTI-DISPECTIVE. Personality Inventory (MMPI)

The personality questionnaire was proposed by S. Hathway and J. McKinley in 1940. It is an implementation of the typological approach to the study of personality and occupies a leading place among other personality questionnaires in psychodiagnostic research.

The questionnaire consists of 550 statements forming 10 main diagnostic scales. For each statement, respondents must give a specific answer. Intended for persons aged 16 years and older with an IQ of at least 80 (according to Wechsler).

There are two modifications of MMPI currently in use.

SMIL (standard methodology for personality research - Sobchik L.N., Lukyanova M.F., 1978). Includes 566 questions (550 original and 16 duplicates). Makes it possible to diagnose 10 main and up to 200 additional scales. The technique is closest to the international standard MMPI, but is cumbersome and in itself has a strong impact on the subject in the manner of an “examination of mental disorders.”

MMIL (Berezin F.B. et al., 1976). Includes 377 questions and makes it possible to reliably diagnose 10 main scales. For this modification, a more significant amount of work on psychometric adaptation has been carried out. Modification MMIL presented below.

Theoretical background

Own theoretical basis MMPI does not have. To compile statements, the authors used patient complaints, descriptions of the symptoms of certain mental illnesses in clinical guidelines (classification of mental illnesses proposed by E. Kraepelin), and previously developed questionnaires. The statements were initially presented to a large group of healthy people, allowing their normative values ​​to be determined. These indicators were then compared with those obtained from various clinical groups. Thus, statements were selected that reliably differentiated healthy people from each of the studied groups of patients. These statements were combined into scales named according to the clinical group for which the scale was validated.



At the same time, one cannot help but dwell on a number of comments regarding the MMPI.

The original MMPI clinical scales were based on traditional psychiatric classifications, which, although popular, rest on questionable theoretical foundations. The artificiality of these categories has caused concern in clinical psychology for a long time. Therefore, it is characteristic that factor analysis based on the intercorrelations of questions and scales shows high intercorrelations among the main clinical scales of the MMPI, which calls into question their value for differential diagnosis.

The MMPI, therefore, does not provide a nosological diagnostic assessment. The personality profile obtained during research using this technique characterizes only the characteristics of the individual at the time of the study. Therefore it cannot be assessed as a "diagnostic label". However, the characteristics of the patient’s personal properties obtained from such a study significantly complement the picture of the pathopsychological register syndrome.

Validity and reliability data

The validity of the MMPI, established on the basis of differentiation of clinical groups, is quite high. Test-retest reliability ranges from 0.50 to 0.90. Split-half reliabilities showed wide variability from scale to scale, ranging from 0.50 to 0.81.

Description of the technique

MMIL (a multifaceted personality study technique is a questionnaire-type test that includes 384 statements covering a wide range of personal characteristics, attitudes, interests, psychopathological and psychosomatic symptoms. Statements can be presented either on cards or in the form of a text brochure. The first presentation option usually used in individual research, the second in group research.In the brochure version, the number of statements is reduced to 377 at the expense of statements relating to sexual issues (in a mass study, such statements cause unwanted tension).

Below are the main clinical scales.

1. Hypochondria scale (Hs) - determines the “closeness” of the subject to the astheno-neurotic personality type.

2. Depression scale (p) - designed to determine the degree of subjective depression, moral discomfort (hypothymic personality type).

3. Hysteria Scale (Hu) - designed to identify individuals prone to neurotic reactions of the conversion type (using symptoms of a physical illness to resolve difficult situations).

4. Psychopathy Scale (Pd) - aimed at diagnosis
sociopathic personality type.

6. Paranoia scale (Ra) - allows you to judge the presence of “extra valuable” ideas and suspicion.

7. Psychasthenia scale (Pt) - the similarity of the subject with patients suffering from phobias, obsessive actions and thoughts (anxious-suspicious personality type) is established.

8. Schizophrenia scale (Sc) - aimed at diagnosing schizoid (autistic) personality type.

9. Hypomania scale (Ma) - determines the degree of closeness of the subject to the hyperthymic personality type.

Along with the scales identified on the basis of a study of typical groups of patients, the test includes two scales, the validation of which was carried out in a study of healthy individuals.

5. The masculinity-femininity scale (Mf) is designed to measure the degree of identification of the subject with the role of a man or woman assigned by society.

0. Social introversion scale (Si) - diagnostics of the degree of compliance with the introverted personality type.

In addition to the listed main test scales, there are three rating scales that allow you to minimize the installation effect and determine the reliability of the result obtained.

1. “Lie” scale (L) - designed to assess the sincerity of the subject.

2. Reliability scale (F) - created to identify unreliable results (associated with the negligence of the subject), as well as aggravation and simulation.

3. Correction scale (K) - introduced in order to smooth out distortions introduced by the subject’s excessive isolation, as well as excessive openness.

Conducting a survey

The subject is told that he must answer whether each of the 377 statements is true or false. The answer is marked by crossing out the square to the right or left of the statement number. If the statement is found to be true, the square to the left of the number (under the letter “B”) is crossed out, if incorrect, the square to the right (under the letter “H”) is crossed out. The answer “I don’t know” is not marked in any way.

The researcher reports that the first reaction is the most natural and therefore you need to answer immediately, so as not to waste time thinking. If this condition is met, the subject responds to 4-7 statements per minute, and completion of the technique takes from 55 minutes to 1 hour 15 minutes.

Some statements included in the test may cause confusion among subjects due to the fact that they relate to severe painful phenomena or situations that are difficult for the subject to attribute to himself. In this case, they should be informed that the set of statements is the same for the study of different populations, and mechanical processing of the results does not allow excluding any statements, because changing the approval number will inevitably cause errors in decoding. If the subject seeks advice regarding a specific statement and his own attitude towards it, the researcher should not suggest or explain the meaning of the statement, but indicate that one must be guided by one’s own understanding of the statement, or recall the corresponding point of the instructions. The researcher should not comment on the question, express attitudes towards it in words, facial expressions or intonation. If difficulties arise, it is useful to discuss with the subject 2-3 statements that are indifferent in content to make sure that he correctly understood the instructions.

Processing the results

The results are processed using special key tablets. Each scale has its own tablet. For scale 5 there are two tablets, separate for men and women. Using tablets, the primary result for each scale is calculated. The answer that matches the “key” is worth 1 point. The result obtained on the K scale, or a certain proportion of it, is added to the primary result on some scales: to the 1st scale - 0.5; to the 4th - 0.4; to the 9th - 0.2 of this result, and to the 7th and 8th scales - it is added in full. Taking into account the correction, the value of the result on each scale is noted on a special map compiled on the basis of the population standard. The lines connecting these points are drawn separately for the rating and basic scales and form the profile of the methodology for multilateral personality research.

The map is designed in such a way that once a profile is plotted on it, it is scored in T-scores. If rating scales produce results greater than 70 T-scores, the result obtained is questionable, and if they exceed 80 T-scores, the result is unreliable. In this case, the technique is presented again. It is better to repeat the technique on the same or the next day. If the result is reliable, the resulting profile is interpreted.

Basics of interpretation of the methodology for multilateral personality research

The information about the meaning of various profile types, which is given below, does not exhaust the variety of possible options, but they can be used as a guide when working with the technique. A systematic presentation of this information is especially useful for researchers beginning to work with the described methodology, since it allows them to quickly acquire the necessary interpretation experience.

The basic rules for assessing a profile, the violation of which most often leads to erroneous interpretation, can be formulated as follows.

1. The profile should be assessed as a whole, and not as a set of independent scales. The results obtained on one of the scales cannot be assessed in isolation from the results on other scales.

2. When assessing a profile, the most important thing is the ratio of the profile level on each scale to the average profile level and especially in relation to neighboring scales (profile peaks). The absolute value of the T-norm on one scale or another is less significant.

3. The profile characterizes the personality characteristics and current mental state of the subject. In clinical practice, it reflects the characteristics of the psychopathological syndrome, and not the nosological affiliation of the disease. Therefore the profile cannot be assessed as a "diagnostic label".

4. The results obtained cannot be considered as unshakable, since the connection of the profile with the current mental state determines its dynamics with changes in this state.

5. Interpretation of individual profiles requires consideration
the entire body of data that cannot be pre-existing
are provided in connection with the already noted variety of individual options. Therefore, literature data containing a description of typical profiles can only be used to master the basic principles of interpretation, and not as ready-made recipes. Trying to use a set of ready-made recipes can lead to significant errors in assessing the results of the study. For example, the same profile obtained in the study of a practically healthy person and an inpatient with severe clinical symptoms will have different meanings.

Rating scales

Rating scales were introduced into the original version of the text in order to study the subject’s attitude towards testing and judge the reliability of the study results. However, subsequent study made it possible to establish that these scales also have significant psychological correlates.

L scale

The statements included in the L scale were selected to identify the subject's tendency to present himself in the most favorable light possible, demonstrating strict adherence to social norms.

The scale consists of 15 statements that relate to socially approved, but unimportant attitudes and norms of everyday behavior, which, due to their low significance, are actually ignored by the vast majority of people. Thus, an increase in the result on the L scale usually indicates the desire of the subject to look in a favorable light. This desire may be situationally determined, due to the subject’s limited horizons, or caused by the presence of pathology. However, it must be borne in mind that some people tend to punctually follow the established standard, always observing any rules, even the most insignificant and not of significant value. In these cases, an increase in the result on the L scale reflects the specified character traits. Belonging to a professional group, from which, due to its specificity, an extremely high standard of behavior and punctual adherence to conventional norms is required, also contributes to an increase in the result on the L scale. This kind of high standard of behavior can be observed, in particular, among justice workers, teachers and in some other professional groups.

It should be noted that because the statements that make up the L scale are used in their literal meaning, they may not reveal the tendency to appear favorably when it occurs in individuals of sufficiently high intelligence and extensive life experience.

If the results on the L scale are between 70 and 80 T-scores, the resulting profile is questionable, and if the results are above 80 T-scores, it is unreliable. High results on the L scale are usually accompanied by a decrease in the profile level on the main clinical scales. If, despite the high result on the L scale, significant increases in the level of the profile on certain clinical scales are detected, they can be taken into account in the totality of data available to the researcher.

F scale

A significant increase in the profile on this scale indicates accidental or intentional distortion of the study results.

The scale consists of 64 statements, which were extremely rarely regarded as “true” by persons included in the normative group of healthy subjects, according to which the MMIL was standardized. At the same time, these statements rarely differentiated the normative group from the patient groups against which the main scales were validated.

Statements included in the F scale relate, in particular, to unusual thoughts, desires and sensations, overt psychotic symptoms, and those whose existence is almost never recognized by the patients being studied.

If the F scale profile exceeds 70 T-scores, the result is questionable, but can be taken into account when confirmed by other data, including clinical data. If the F-scale result exceeds 80 T-scores, the study result should be considered unreliable. This result may be caused by technical errors made during the survey. In cases where the possibility of error is excluded, the unreliability of the result is determined by the attitude of the subject or his condition. During attitudinal behavior, the subject may recognize as true statements regarding unusual or clearly psychotic phenomena (if he seeks to aggravate or simulate psychopathological symptoms).

An unreliable result associated with the patient’s condition may be observed in an acute psychotic state (impaired consciousness, delirium, etc.), which distorts the perception of statements or the reaction to them. A similar distortion can be observed in cases of severe psychotic disorders leading to a defect. A dubious or unreliable result can be obtained from anxious individuals in cases where an urgent need for help prompts them to give considered answers to most statements. In these cases, simultaneously with an increase in the result on the F scale, the entire profile increases significantly, but the shape of the profile is not distorted and the possibility of its interpretation remains. Finally, changes in the subject’s attention can lead to an unreliable result, as a result of which he makes mistakes or cannot understand the meaning of the statement. If an unreliable result is obtained, in some cases it is possible to increase the reliability of the study through re-testing. In this case, it is more advisable to repeatedly present only those statements for which the responses taken into account were received. If the result of repeated testing is unreliable, you can try to establish the reason for the distortion of the result by discussing his answers with the subject. To avoid breaking contact with the subject, it is necessary to obtain his consent to such a discussion.

With a reliable result of the study, a relatively high level of profile on the F scale can be observed in various types of non-conforming individuals, since such individuals will exhibit reactions that are not typical for the normative group, and, accordingly, more often give answers taken into account on the F scale. Violation of conformity may be associated with the originality of perception and logic, characteristic of individuals of the schizoid type, autistic people and those experiencing difficulties in interpersonal contacts, as well as with psychopathic traits in individuals prone to disordered (“bohemian”) behavior or characterized by a pronounced sense of protest against conventional norms. An increase in the profile on the F scale can also be observed in very young people during the period of personality formation in cases where the need for self-expression is realized through non-conformity in behavior and views. Severe anxiety and the need for help usually manifests itself in a relatively high level of result on the described scale.

A moderate increase on the F scale in the absence of psychopathological symptoms usually reflects internal tension, dissatisfaction with the situation, and poorly organized activity. The tendency to follow conventional norms and the absence of internal tension determines a low result on the F scale.

In clinically undoubted cases of the disease, an increase in the profile on the F scale usually correlates with the severity of psychopathological symptoms.

K scale

The scale consists of 30 statements that make it possible to differentiate between individuals who seek to soften or hide psychopathological phenomena and individuals who are overly open.

In the original version of the MMPI, this scale was originally intended to examine the degree of caution of subjects in a testing situation and the tendency (largely unconscious) to deny existing unpleasant sensations, life difficulties and conflicts. The result obtained from the K scale is added to correct the indicated tendency to five of the ten main clinical scales in a proportion corresponding to its influence on each of these scales. However, the K scale, in addition to its significance for assessing the test subject’s reaction to the testing situation and correcting results on a number of basic clinical scales, is of significant interest for assessing certain personality traits of the subject.

Individuals with high scores on the K scale tend to base their behavior on social approval and are concerned about their social status. They tend to deny any difficulties in interpersonal relationships or in controlling their own behavior, strive to comply with accepted norms and refrain from criticism to the extent that the behavior of others falls within the framework of the accepted norm. Obviously non-conforming, deviating from traditions and customs, behavior of other people that goes beyond the conventional framework causes a pronounced negative reaction in persons giving high scores on the K scale. Due to the tendency to deny (to a large extent at the perceptual level) information indicating difficulties and conflicts, these individuals may not have an adequate idea of ​​how others perceive them. In clinical cases, an expressed desire to achieve a favorable attitude towards oneself may be combined with anxiety and uncertainty.

With insignificant expression (moderate increases on the K scale), the described tendencies not only do not disrupt the individual’s adaptation, but even facilitate it, causing a feeling of harmony with the environment and an approving assessment of the rules accepted in this environment. In this regard, persons with a moderate increase in profile on the K scale give the impression of reasonable, friendly, sociable people with a wide range of interests. Extensive experience in interpersonal contacts and denial of difficulties determine in individuals of this type a more or less high level of enterprise and the ability to find the right line of behavior. Since such qualities improve social adaptation, a moderate increase in the profile on the K scale can be considered a prognostically favorable sign.

Persons with a very low profile level on the K scale are well aware of their difficulties and tend to exaggerate rather than underestimate the degree of personal inadequacy. They do not hide their weaknesses, difficulties and psychopathological disorders. The tendency to be critical of oneself and others leads to skepticism. Their dissatisfaction and tendency to exaggerate the significance of conflicts makes them easily vulnerable and creates awkwardness in interpersonal relationships.

Index F - K

Since the trends measured by the F and K scales are largely in opposite directions, the difference in the primary result obtained on these scales has

essential for determining the attitude of the subject at the time of judging the reliability of the result obtained. The average value of this index in the MMIL is: 7 for men and 8 for women. The intervals at which the result can be considered reliable (if none of the rating scales exceeds 70 T-points) range from -18 to +4 for men, from -23 to +7 for women. If the F-K difference is +5 to +7 for men and +8 to +10 for women, then the result is questionable, but if confirmed by clinical data, it can be taken into account provided that none of the rating scales exceeds 80 T- points.

The greater the F-K difference, the more pronounced the subject’s desire to emphasize the severity of his symptoms and life’s difficulties, to evoke sympathy and condolences. A high level of the F-K index may indicate aggravation. A decrease in the F-K index reflects the desire to improve one’s self-image, mitigate one’s symptoms and emotionally charged problems, or deny their presence. A low level of this index may indicate dissimulation of existing psychopathological disorders.


Clinical scales

One of the very important advantages of the methodology is the presence in its structure of rating scales, or, as they are more often called, reliability scales, which determine the reliability of the data obtained and the attitude of the subjects regarding the examination procedure. These are the “lie” scale – L, the “reliability” scale – F and the “correction” scale – K. In addition, there is a scale indicated by a question mark – “?”. Scale “?” records the number of statements to which the subject could not give a definite answer; in this case, the scale indicator “?” significant if it exceeds 26 raw points, because the number 26 corresponds to the number of statements removed from the calculation, accompanied in the booklet by the remark - “The number of this statement should be circled.” If the scale indicator is “?” above 70 raw points, the test data is unreliable. The total figure is within 36-40 s.b. acceptable; results from 41 to 60 s.b. indicate the subject's wariness.

Correct presentation of the technique and a preliminary conversation between the psychologist and the subject significantly reduces mistrust and secrecy, which are reflected in the increase in insignificant answers. The “L” scale includes those statements that reveal the subject's tendency to present himself in the most favorable light possible, demonstrating very strict adherence to social norms. High scores on the “L” scale (70 T and above), i.e. more than 10 s.b., indicate a deliberate desire to embellish oneself, “to show oneself in the best light,” denying the presence in one’s behavior of weaknesses inherent in any person - the ability to be angry at least sometimes or at least a little, to be lazy, to neglect diligence, severity of manners, truthfulness , neatness in the most minimal sizes and in the most forgivable situation. In this case, the profile appears smoothed, lowered or recessed. Most of all, high indicators of the L scale affect the underestimation of the 4th, 6th, 7th and 8th scales. An increase in the L scale within the range of 60 - 69 T is often found in people of a primitive mental make-up with insufficient self-understanding and low adaptive capabilities. In individuals with a high level of education and culture, profile distortions due to an increase in the L scale are rare. A moderate increase in L - up to 60 T - is normally observed in old age as a reflection of age-related personality changes towards increased normative behavior.

Low scores on the L scale (0 – 2 s.b.) indicate the absence of a tendency to embellish one’s character. The profile is unreliable if L – 70 T is higher. Retesting is required after an additional conversation with the subject. Another scale that allows you to judge the reliability of the results obtained is the F reliability scale. High indicators on this scale may cast doubt on the reliability of the examination if the F indicators are above 70 T. The reasons may be different: excessive anxiety at the time of the examination, which affected the performance and correct understanding of statements; negligence in recording responses; the desire to slander oneself, to stun the psychologist with the uniqueness of one’s personality, to emphasize the defects of one’s character; a tendency to dramatize existing circumstances and one’s attitude towards them; an attempt to portray another, fictitious person; decreased performance due to fatigue or illness. It should also be borne in mind that a high F may be the result of the experimenter’s negligence when processing test results. Some increase in F may be the result of excessive diligence with pronounced self-criticism and frankness. In individuals who are more or less disharmonious and in a state of discomfort, F can be at the level of 65 - 75 T, which reflects emotional instability. High F, accompanied by an increase in the profile on the 4th, 6th, 8th and 9th scales, is found in individuals prone to affective reactions with low conformity. Unlike other scales, for the F scale the standard spread is 10 T higher, i.e. reaches 80 T. However, indicators above 70 T, as a rule, reflect a high level of emotional tension or are a sign of personal disintegration, which can be associated with both severe stress and neuropsychic disorders of a different nature. If the profile data, despite the high F (above 80 T), according to objective observation and the results of other methods, still reflect the real-life experiences of the subject, which is often encountered in practice, then they can be considered in the context of the entire amount of available data as worthy of serious attention information, but when statistically processing and deriving the average results of the study group, these profiles should not be included, since their statistical reliability is low.

Indicators of the K correction scale are moderately increased (55 – 60 T) with a person’s natural defensive reaction to an attempt to invade the world of his innermost experiences, i.e. with good control over emotions. A significant increase (above 65 T) indicates a lack of frankness, a desire to hide character defects and the presence of any problems and conflicts. High K indices positively correlate with the presence of defensive reactions of the repression type. A profile with a high K (66 T and above) is often accompanied by an increase in indicators on the 3rd scale and recessed 4th, 7th and 8th. Such a profile indicates that the subject did not want to openly talk about himself and demonstrates only his sociability and desire to make a pleasant impression. Due to the fact that the K scale registers intentionally hidden or unconsciously repressed psychological problems (emotional tension, antisocial tendencies and non-conformity of attitudes), a certain part of the indicator of this scale is added to the raw data of some of the scales most dependent on it: 0.5 - to 1- th scale, 0.4 - to the 4th, 0.2 - to the 9th and 1.0 K each (the entire value of K as a whole) - to the 7th and 8th scales.

Low scores on the K scale are usually observed with elevated and high F and reflect frankness and self-criticism. Reduced K is typical for people with low intelligence, but can also be associated with a decrease in self-control with excessive emotional tension and personal disintegration. A good guideline for assessing the reliability of the profile and identifying the subject’s attitude towards the testing procedure, in addition to the specified criteria, is the “F – K” factor, i.e. the difference between the raw results of these scales. On average, its value in harmonious individuals ranges from +6 to -6. If the difference F - K = +7... +11, then during the examination the subject has a vaguely expressed tendency to emphasize existing problems, to dramatize his difficulties, to aggravate his state. If F – K = from -7 to -11, then a negative attitude towards testing, closedness, and lack of frankness is revealed. A value (F -K) exceeding + – 11 in one direction or another casts doubt on the reliability of the data obtained, which at least should be considered through the prism of the identified installation.


(Standardized multifactorial method of personality research - SMIL)

Minnesota Multifactor Personality Inventory
(The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory - MMPI )


  • AVERAGE NORMATIVE DATA ON THE MAIN SCALES OF THE SMIL TEST / MMPI TEST
  • ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SMIL TEST / MMPI TEST

    TREATMENT
    MMPI TEST (SMIL)

    The calculation of scores, called raw scores, for each key (i.e. scale) must be done very carefully, repeating the calculation up to two matching results. Incorrect scoring will cause all subsequent interpretations to be distorted or completely incorrect.


    “I don’t know” responses make up the “?” scale. The “L” scale - the “Lies” scale - shows how sincere the subject was during the testing process. The “F” scale - the “reliability” scale - shows the level of reliability of the data obtained, depending on his frankness and willingness to cooperate. The “K” scale - the “correction” scale reveals the degree of distortion of the test (profile), associated both with the closeness of the subject and with the influence of the unconscious defense mechanism of “repressing” from the psyche information that is traumatic and destroys the positive image of the “I”. Depending on the indicators of the reliability scales, the profile (test) is recognized as reliable or unreliable, and its features are considered through the prism of the subject’s attitudes towards the examination procedure.

    To avoid too much influence of the displacement mechanism on the main profile (test), you should add 0,5 from the sum of raw points (s.b.) of the scale indicator “ TO» to raw points 1st scale, then add 0,4 values ​​s.b. scale " TO» to s.b. 4th scale, overall ( 1,0 ) « TO" - the entire amount s.b. scale " TO" - added to s.b. 7th and 8th scales, and finally 0,2 s.b. scale " TO» is added to s.b. 9th scales. These indicators are summed with the raw scores of the corresponding scales (1st, 4th, 7th, 8th and 9th) and the final (corrected) raw scores for all scales are displayed.

    Due to the fact that the number of significant answers (crosses) on each scale is not the same and their statistical significance (price, cost) is also not equivalent, comparison of indicators on different scales is possible only by reducing the raw scores to a generalized, standardized unit. Such a unit in this technique is the walls, each of which contains 10 T-points and is equal to the standard deviation from the average standard line, which represents 50 T on the profile sheet. This is an empirically identified averaged norm. A deviation within 2 standard deviations (s) - 20T - both up, up to 70, and down, up to 30T, is conventionally defined as a spread within the normative corridor. Indicators above 70 and below 30T are regarded as a deviation from the norm.

    Keys to the MMPI test.

    Main profile scales

    "L" False
    N: 15, 30, 45, 75, 105, 135, 195, 225, 255, 285, 60, 90, 120, 150, 165.

    "F" Confidence
    B: 14, 23, 27, 31, 33, 34, 35, 40, 42, 48, 49, 50, 53, 56, 66, 85, 121, 123, 139, 146, 151, 156, 168, 184, 197, 200, 202, 205, 206, 209, 210, 211, 215, 218, 227, 245, 246, 247, 252, 256, 269, 275, 286, 291, 293.
    N: 17, 20, 54, 65, 75, 83, 112, 113, 115, 164, 169, 177, 185, 196, 199, 220, 257, 258, 272, 276.

    "K" Correction
    Q:96.
    N:30, 39, 71, 89, 124, 129, 134, 138, 142, 148, 160, 170, 171, 180, 183, 217, 234, 267, 272, 296, 316, 322, 374, 383, 397, 398, 406, 461, 502.

    "1" Overcontrol (Hypochondriasis, Hs)
    B: 23, 29, 43, 62, 72, 108, 114, 125, 161, 189, 273.
    N: 2, 3, 7, 9, 18, 51, 55, 63, 68, 103, 140, 153, 155, 163, 175, 188, 190, 192, 230, 243, 274, 281.

    “2” Pessimism (Depression, D)
    B: 5, 13, 23, 32, 41, 43, 52, 67, 86, 104, 130, 138, 142, 158, 159, 182, 189, 193, 236, 259.
    H:2, 8, 9, 18, 30, 36, 39, 46, 51, 57, 58, 64, 80, 88, 89, 95, 98, 107, 122, 131, 145, 152, 153, 154, 155, 160, 178, 191, 207, 208, 238, 241242, 248, 263, 270, 271, 272, 285, 296.

    “3” Emotional lability (Hysteria, Hy)
    B: 10, 23, 32, 43, 44, 47, 76, 114, 179, 186, 189, 238
    N:2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 26, 30, 51, 55, 71, 89, 93, 103, 107, 109, 124, 128, 129, 136, 137, 141, 147, 153, 160, 162, 163, 170, 172, 174, 175, 180, 188, 190, 192, 201, 213, 230, 234, 243, 265, 267, 274, 279, 289, 292.

    "4" Impulsivity (Impulsivity, Pd)
    B:16, 21, 24, 32, 33, 35, 36, 42, 61, 67, 84, 94, 102, 106, 110, 118, 127, 215, 216, 224, 239, 244, 245, 284
    N: 8, 20, 37, 82, 91, 96, 107, 134, 137, 141, 155, 170, 171, 173, 180, 183, 201, 231, 235, 237, 248, 267, 287, 289, 294, 296.

    “5-F” Femininity (for women) (Masculinity/Femininity, Mf)
    B: 4, 25, 70, 74, 77, 78, 87, 92, 126, 132, 133, 134, 140, 149, 187, 203, 204, 217, 226, 239, 261, 278, 282, 295, 299
    N: 1, 19, 26, 69, 79, 80, 81, 89, 99, 112, 115, 116, 117, 120, 144, 176, 179, 198, 213, 219, 221, 223, 229, 231, 249, 254, 260, 262, 264, 280, 283, 297, 300

    “5-M” Femininity (for men) (Masculinity/Femininity)
    B:4, 25, 69, 70, 74, 77, 78, 87, 92, 126, 132, 134, 140, 149, 179, 187, 203, 204, 217, 226, 231, 239, 261, 278, 282, 295, 297, 299.
    N:1, 19, 26, 28, 79, 80, 81, 89, 99, 112, 115, 116, 117, 120, 133, 144, 176, 198, 213, 214, 219, 221, 223, 229, 249, 254, 260, 262, 264, 280, 283, 300

    "6" Rigidity (Rigidity, Pa)
    B:15, 16, 22, 24, 27, 35, 110, 121, 123, 127, 151, 157, 158, 202, 275, 284, 291, 293, 299, 305, 317, 338, 341, 364, 365.
    N: 93, 107, 109, 111, 117, 124, 268, 281, 294, 313, 316, 319, 327, 347, 348.

    “7” Anxiety (Psychasthenia, Pt)
    B:10, 15, 22, 32, 41, 67, 76, 86, 94, 102, 106, 142, 159, 182, 189, 217, 238, 266, 301, 304, 305, 317, 321, 336, 337, 340, 342, 343, 344, 346, 349, 351, 352, 356, 357, 359, 360, 361.
    N:3, 8, 36, 122, 152, 164, 178, 329, 353.

    “8” Individualism (Schizoidity, Sc)
    B: 15, 16, 21, 22, 24, 32, 33, 35, 38, 40, 41, 47, 52, 76, 97, 104, 121, 156, 157, 159, 168, 179, 182, 194, 202, 210, 212, 238, 241, 251, 259, 266, 273, 282, 291, 297, 301, 303, 305, 307, 312, 320, 324, 325, 332, 334, 335, 339, 341 , 345, 349, 350, 352, 354, 355, 356, 360, 363, 364.
    N: 8, 17, 20, 37, 65, 103, 119, 177, 178, 187, 192, 196, 220, 276, 281, 306, 309, 322, 330.

    “9” Optimism (Hypomania, Ma)
    B: 11, 13, 21, 22, 59, 64, 73, 97, 100, 109, 127, 134, 145, 156, 157, 167, 181, 194, 212, 222, 226, 228, 232, 233, 238, 240, 250, 251, 263, 266, 268, 271, 277, 279, 298.
    N:101, 105, 111, 119, 130, 148, 166, 171, 180, 267, 289.

    “0” Introversion (Introversion, Si)
    B: 32, 67, 82, 111, 117, 124, 138, 147, 171, 172, 180, 201, 236, 267, 278, 292, 304, 316, 321, 332, 336, 342, 357, 377, 383, 398, 401, 427, 436, 455, 473, 467, 549, 564.
    N: 25, 33, 57, 91, 99, 119, 126, 143, 193, 208, 229, 231, 254, 262, 281, 296, 309, 353, 359, 371, 391, 400, 415, 440, 446, 449, 450, 451, 462, 469, 479, 481, 482, 501, 521, 547.

    ATTENTION


    Question numbers that SHOULD NOT be taken into account when processing the test:
    14, 33, 48, 63, 66, 69, 121, 123, 133, 151, 168, 182, 184, 197, 200, 205, 266, 275, 293, 334, 349, 350, 462, 464, 474, 542, 551

    T-scores for any raw score on each specific scale are calculated using the formula:

    , Where

    50 is the “norm” line, from which indicators are counted both upward (increase) and downward (decrease);
    X- this is the final raw result obtained on a certain scale;
    M- the median, empirically identified in the process of restandardizing the methodology, that is, the average standard indicator on this scale;
    & - sigma, the value of the standard deviation from the norm, discovered during the standardization process.

    Average normative data on the main SMIL scales

    Scale names

    Men n=580

    Women n=280

    Credibility

    Correction

    Overcontrol

    Pessimism

    Emotion lability

    Impulsiveness

    Femininity

    Rigidity

    Anxiety

    Individualism

    Optimistic

    Introversion


    Analysis of the results of the SMIL TEST / MMPI TEST

    In a narrow corridor of the norm - within 46-55 T - profile fluctuations are difficult to interpret, since they do not reveal sufficiently pronounced individual personality properties and are characteristic of a completely balanced personality (if the reliability scales do not show a pronounced attitude towards lying - a high scale "L" - or lack of frankness - high "K" scale).

    Increases ranging from 56-66 T reveal those leading trends that determine the characterological characteristics of the individual. Higher indicators of different basic scales (67-75 T) highlight those accentuated features that at times complicate a person’s socio-psychological adaptation.

    Indicators above 75 T indicate impaired adaptation and a deviation of the individual’s state from normal. These may be psychopathic character traits, a state of stress caused by an extreme situation, neurotic disorders and, finally, psychopathology, the presence of which can only be judged by a pathopsychologist or psychiatrist based on the totality of data from psychodiagnostic, experimental psychological and clinical research. A difficult life situation, traumatic events, physical illness - all this can cause a state of temporary maladjustment.

    If the majority (at least 7) ​​of the profile scales are significantly elevated and there are no scales whose indicators are below 55 T (except, in extreme cases, one), then such a profile is called “floating”. The criteria for identifying signs of a floating profile are as follows: F is between 65 and 90 T, each of the scales - 1, 2, 3, 7 and 8 - is above 70, the rest are 56 T and above. This profile indicates severe stress and personality maladjustment.

    With a pronounced tendency to avoid frankness and to bring answers as close as possible to the norm, a recessed profile is obtained. In the recessed profile, the indicators of most scales are below 45 T, and a number of others are no higher than 50 T. This profile is most often the result of a negative attitude towards the testing procedure and is accompanied by high indicators of the L and K reliability scales with low F.

    With a clear exaggeration of the severity of existing problems and one’s condition, a highly positioned jagged profile is formed. If a subject, trying to understand how the technique works and influence the results, answers “wrong” to almost all statements, then the profile turns out flat, (smoothed) on the 4th, 6th and 8th scales, but inflated on 1 1st and 3rd scales. Conversely, if the majority of statements are answered “true,” then a profile with high peaks on the F, 6, and 8 scales is obtained.

    Confidence scale (L). Includes those statements that reveal a tendency to present oneself in a more favorable light, to demonstrate very strict adherence to rules. High scores on this scale (70 T and above) indicate a deliberate desire to embellish oneself, denying the presence in one’s behavior of weaknesses inherent in any person - the ability to be angry at least sometimes or at least a little, to be lazy, to neglect diligence, strictness of manners, truthfulness, accuracy in the most minimal sizes and in the most forgivable situation. In this case, the profile appears smoothed, lowered or recessed.

    Most of all, high indicators of the L scale affect the underestimation of the 4th, 6th, 7th and 8th scales. An increase in L to 60 T is normally observed in old age as a reflection of age-related personality changes towards increased normative behavior.

    Low scores on the L scale (0 - 2 s.b.) indicate the absence of a tendency to embellish one’s character. The test (profile) is unreliable if L is 70 T and higher. In this case, retesting is required.

    Reliability scale (F).

    High scores (70 T and above) indicate excessive self-criticism. Tendencies to exaggerate existing problems, the desire to emphasize defects of one’s character. Signs of lack of harmony and psychological comfort. Signs of defensive reactions: perhaps an unconscious attempt to portray another (fictitious) person, rather than one’s own personal characteristics. Elevated values ​​on this scale may be a consequence of excessive anxiety during examination procedures.

    High scores on this scale may cast doubt on the reliability of the examination if the F scores are above 80 T (for this scale, the upper limit of the norm is 10 T higher than for other scales).

    The reasons may be different: excessive anxiety at the time of the examination, which affected the performance and correct understanding of statements; negligence in recording responses; the desire to slander oneself, to stun the psychologist with the uniqueness of one’s personality, to emphasize the defects of one’s character; a tendency to dramatize existing circumstances and one’s attitude towards them; an attempt to portray another, fictitious person; decreased performance due to fatigue or illness.

    Correction scale (K).

    The correction scale shows a tendency to distort the examination results, which is associated with excessive caution, high self-control during the examination and (or) the desire to show oneself “in the best light.” Unconscious control of behavior is also possible.

    Indicators of the K correction scale are moderately increased (55 - 60 T) with a person’s natural defensive reaction to an attempt to invade the world of his innermost experiences, i.e. with good control over emotions. A significant increase (above 65 T) indicates a lack of frankness, a desire to hide character defects and the presence of any problems and conflicts. High K indices positively correlate with the presence of defensive reactions of the repression type.

    Low scores on the K scale are usually observed with elevated and high F and reflect frankness and self-criticism.

    A good guideline for assessing the reliability of the profile and identifying the subject’s attitude towards the testing procedure, in addition to the specified criteria, is the “F-K” factor, i.e. the difference between the raw results of these scales. On average, its value in harmonious individuals ranges from +6 to -6. If the difference F-K = +7... +11, then during the examination the subject has a vaguely expressed attitude towards emphasizing existing problems, towards dramatizing his difficulties.

    If F-K = from -7 to -11, then a negative attitude towards testing, closedness, and lack of frankness is revealed. The value (F-K) in raw points exceeding ± 11 in one direction or another casts doubt on the reliability of the data obtained, which at least should be considered through the prism of the identified installation

  • 1. Overcontrol scale, hypochondriasis (Hs).

    Tendency to social passivity and subordination. Slow adaptation to professional operating conditions, climatic factors and a new team. Poor tolerance to change of environment. Poor self-control during interpersonal conflicts.

    The main problem of this type of personality is the suppression of spontaneity (i.e., ease, spontaneity of reactions), inhibition of active self-realization, control of aggressiveness, hypersocial orientation of interests, orientation to rules, instructions, directions; inertia in decision making, over-responsibility, combined with a tendency to avoid serious responsibility for fear of failure.

    The style of thinking is inert, dogmatic, relying on existing common points of view, rules and instructions. This cognitive style is devoid of freedom, independence and looseness. The basis for knowledge of the surrounding world for people of this type are ready-made generally accepted clichés.

    In interpersonal relationships - high demands on both oneself and others in terms of compliance with the moral criteria of society. They are characterized by stinginess in emotional manifestations, caution, and prudence. The emotional sphere is characterized by a contradictory clash of restraint and irritability.

    Increased data on the 1st scale indicates an individual’s propensity for professional activities in which such qualities as diligence, the ability to obey the established order and follow certain instructions and directives, the ability to restrain the inherent weaknesses of a person, and resist temptations are appropriate and necessary. This is an office type of employee, a conscientious official, this is also a security service, labor protection, personnel service in the army. Such features are also found among clergy, missionary helpers (as opposed to missionary leaders or fans), and also as one of the features in the personality structure of a teacher, formed under the influence of social orders over many previous decades in our country.

    With excessive emotional tension (scale indicator above 75 T), difficult adaptation is manifested by an increased focus on deviations from the norm, both in terms of interpersonal relationships, where people in this circle are irritated by the irresponsibility and insufficient morality of the actions of others in their opinion, and in the sphere of well-being, where excessive attention to the functions of one’s own body can develop into hypochondriasis. At the same time, not only hypochondriasis is manifested, but also such personal traits as dogmatism, hypocrisy are strengthened, thinking becomes more inert, caution, didacticism, and edifying tone are more pronounced in interpersonal contacts.

    In general, in people of this type, in all their life’s vicissitudes, a fateful thread can be seen, manifested by dissatisfaction with the imperfections of people and the moral laws that guide them, as well as their own duality: the soul cannot simultaneously realize two polar needs: 1st - to remain in within the framework of hypersocial and moral demands placed on oneself and others, 2nd - to achieve success and respect (which is a universal human need). The most successful social role is that of a zealous enforcer of laws, a keeper of traditions, a guardian of morality, protecting others from risky actions.

  • 2. Scale of pessimism, depression (D).

    Aimed at identifying depressive conditions. It speaks of a tendency towards low mood, lack of self-confidence, anxiety, increased feelings of guilt, weakened volitional control, increased sensitivity and resentment. People of this type have low resistance to mental and physical stress and the inability to quickly make independent decisions. If you fail, there is a tendency to fall into despair. It is characteristic of a weak type of higher nervous activity.

    As a leading peak in a profile that does not go beyond the norm, it reveals the predominance of a passive personal position. The leading motivational focus is avoiding failure. Individuals of this type are characterized by the following features: a high level of awareness of existing problems through the prism of dissatisfaction and a pessimistic assessment of their prospects; a tendency to think, inertia in decision making, a pronounced depth of experience, an analytical mind, skepticism, self-criticism, some lack of confidence in oneself and one’s capabilities.

    Individuals whose profiles are accentuated on the 2nd scale (“melancholic” according to Gannushkin, inhibited according to Leonhard and Lichko, “sad people” according to Dikaya, “pessimistic” according to the typology of the author of the manual) are capable of refusing to realize immediate needs for the sake of distant plans. The style of interpersonal behavior is manifested by features of dependence, which are most noticeable in contacts with an authoritative person and with the object of affection; at the same time, distance and a painfully acute sense of self-esteem can be heard at the same time (especially when combining peaks on the 2nd and 4th profile scales).

    For these people, the need for understanding, love, and a friendly attitude towards oneself is one of the leading needs that is never fully satisfied. Under stress, there is a tendency to stop reactions, i.e. to blocking activity, or driven behavior, subordination to the leading personality.

    The defense mechanism is refusal of self-realization and strengthening of consciousness control. In professional terms, there is a need for such types of activities that are closer to the “office” style of work in the humanitarian or general theoretical (with sufficiently high intelligence) direction, where a serious, thoughtful attitude to the work performed is especially important.

    A peak on the 2nd scale, reaching a level of 70 -75 T, reveals accentuation of the hypothymic (hyposthenic) type. High scores on the 2nd scale may be associated with a situation of severe disappointment after an experienced failure or in connection with a disease that disrupts the normal course of life and long-term plans of a person. Therefore, a rise in the profile on the 2nd scale above 70 T reveals in the subject not only a low mood due to negative experiences, but also certain personal characteristics: a tendency to acutely experience failures, to worry, to an increased sense of guilt with a self-critical attitude towards one’s shortcomings, with self-doubt. An increase in the 2nd reveals conscious self-control, when unfulfilled intentions - due to external circumstances or internal reasons - are reflected in a low mood as a result of a deficit or loss. At the same time, people in this circle can show sufficient activity, following the leader, as the most conforming and socially pliable group.

    People of this type are distinguished by the greatest vulnerability to life’s adversities, the desire to comprehend and “slow down” their own immediate impulses, to avoid confrontation with the cruel laws of real life due to a pessimistic assessment of their capabilities when confronting others.

    The structure of a given personality is such that the fate-realizing tendency bears the imprint of a certain passivity, and circumstances can dominate the character. Apparently, therefore, this type is characterized by fatalism, i.e. the tendency to rely on how everything “works out by itself,” “where the curve will take you,” and “how lucky you are,” rather than trying to influence fate yourself. These are passion-bearers: without realizing it themselves, they revel in the role of the victim, meekly bearing his cross. (Type “2” should be distinguished from senile passivity acquired over the years).

    By refusing to fulfill immediate egoistic needs, type “2” individuals hope to thereby solve distant problems and form a base of spiritual values. Unfulfilled needs are sublimated and manifested by general humanistic tendencies. Personal aspects of life are determined by their desire to preserve the family; persons of this circle get married, focusing on the similarity of characters or agreeing to a dependent position; show pronounced responsibility for children and react painfully to separation from loved ones. Among individuals of this type there are more monogamous people.

    If there is a social niche corresponding to their personal inclinations, they successfully realize their abilities, while showing emphasized responsibility. Even in a criminal environment, they are able to perform only the most honest and driven roles (treasurer or “on lookout”). They say about such people that they “have the fear of God in their souls”; They are more likely than others to be capable of altruistic manifestations. A simultaneous increase in the 2nd and 9th scales reflects a tendency to mood swings, a cyclothymic personality variant or cyclothymia.

  • 3. Scale of emotional lability, hysteria (Well).

    An increase in indicators on the scale reveals emotional lability, repression of complex psychological problems, social and emotional immaturity of the individual, up to hysterical manifestations (with an increase in indicators above 80 T). People of this type exhibit signs of hysterical character traits: the desire to appear more significant, better than they really are, a tendency towards egocentrism and self-pity, an expressed desire to attract the attention of others at any cost.

    An increase in profile on this scale reveals the instability of emotions and a conflicting combination of multidirectional tendencies: a high level of aspirations is combined with the need to participate in the interests of the group, selfishness - with altruistic declarations, aggressiveness - with the desire to please others.

    Persons with the leading 3rd scale are distinguished by a certain demonstrativeness, brightness of emotional manifestations with some superficiality of experiences, instability of self-esteem, which is significantly influenced by a significant environment; “childishness”, immaturity of attitudes and judgments.

    The type of perception, processing and reproduction of information is visual-figurative, sensory, artistic. Personalities of this type think in holistic images that have shape, color and emotional overtones. This is the most direct type of thinking characteristic of the early period of development; it is where a child begins to comprehend the world around him. Remaining a basic characteristic, emotional lability manifests itself as a leading tendency, giving the type of thinking a visual-figurative, sensual style.

    There is a pronounced ability to easily adapt to various social roles; artistic postures, facial expressions and gestures attract the attention of others, which serves as a stimulating factor that excites and flatters their vanity.

    Persons with the leading 3rd scale are attracted to types of professional activities in which the need for communication and the experience of vivid feelings is satisfied. Personalities of this type need the opportunity to demonstrate themselves; increased emotivity, a pronounced tendency to transform, demonstrative traits, the need for involvement in the general mood of others creates favorable soil for self-determination in the field of artistic activity, where these properties are quite appropriate, in pedagogy or in the field of social activity, where these qualities can be a good addition to provided that there is sufficiently high intelligence and a mature civic platform.

    These personal characteristics can also find application in working conditions in the service sector, in amateur performances, as well as as a variant of a professional manager in production, in administrative work or in the officer personnel service, since these people are able to both obey and command, easily passing from one social role to another.

    Signs of emotional immaturity are revealed that are more characteristic of a female type of behavior with a certain infantilism, affectation, and dependent tendencies. Despite their pronounced egocentrism and tendency to feel sorry for themselves, these individuals strive to level out the conflict and attach great importance to family status.

    Individuals with a high 3rd scale (above 75 T) are characterized by increased nervousness, tearfulness, excessive dramatization of ongoing events, and a tendency to narrow consciousness, even to the point of fainting. The combination of high scores on the 3rd and 4th scales significantly enhances the characteristics of the 3rd, increasing the likelihood of hysterical type behavioral reactions with a tendency to “self-inflate” in conflict situations and with a pronounced desire for emotional involvement.

    These people burn themselves out with their conflicting emotions, seeking to succeed mainly through the help of others, but attributing credit only to themselves. They fill their family life and personal relationships with drama, problems with children become more complicated as they grow and mature, and at work, excess emotions can manifest themselves negatively. Thanks to their pronounced flexibility and sensitivity to the moods of their environment, as well as due to their noticeable vanity, they move up the social ladder in leaps and bounds, reacting painfully to failures and boastfully celebrating the slightest successes.

    Both the character itself and the fate of such people are diverse, contradictory for an unambiguous assessment, motley with events, contacts and hobbies. Their social role is to stir things up, disturb the peace, energetically call somewhere, but not really lead to any specific goal. In the social arena, more often they are “those who follow the leader,” companions and heralds of the “hero.” Traits of the 3rd scale can accompany the portrait of a public leader as an addition to other characteristics. In politics, these are eloquent populists who easily change their line of behavior out of vanity and their own instability.

    Cardiovascular problems and general health concerns take up a lot of their attention and time. The problem of “to be or to seem” is solved primarily in favor of the latter by a person of this type.

    Low scores on the 3rd scale (below 50 T) indicate greater emotional stability, reduced sensitivity to environmental influences with a relatively low responsiveness to problems of the social microclimate.

  • 4. Impulsivity, psychopathy scale (Pd).

    As a leader in a profile located within the normative range, it reveals an active personal position, high search activity, in the structure of motivational orientation - the predominance of achievement motivation, confidence and speed in decision making.

    The motive for achieving success here is closely related to the will to realize strong desires, which are not always subject to the control of reason. The less mature the personality before us, the less the norms of behavior instilled in upbringing dominate a person, the greater the risk of spontaneous activity aimed at realizing momentary impulses, contrary to common sense and the interests of the surrounding society.

    People in this circle are characterized by impatience, a penchant for risk, an unstable, often inflated level of aspirations, the level of which has a pronounced dependence on momentary motives and external influences, on success and failure.

    Behavior is relaxed, spontaneity in the manifestation of feelings, in speech production and in manners. Statements and actions often precede planned and consistent thoughtfulness of actions. The tendency to resist external pressure, the tendency to rely mainly on one’s own opinion, and even more on momentary impulses. A noticeably expressed desire to follow one’s own primitive desires, self-indulgence. In personally significant situations, quickly fading outbreaks of conflict may appear.

    Interest in activities with pronounced activity (from a young age - physical, over the years - social or antisocial), love for high speeds, and in connection with this - for moving equipment, the desire to choose a job that allows one to avoid subordination, as well as to find use for dominant traits character. Dominance in this context does not necessarily mean leadership ability. Here we are talking mainly about low subordination and emphasized independence, in contrast to leadership, which involves a penchant for organizational functions, the ability to infect others with your ideas and lead them, integrating their actions in accordance with your plans.

    Persons of this type do not tolerate monotony well, monotony makes them drowsy, and the stereotypical type of activity makes them bored. The mechanism of restraining negative emotions under the strong influence of “rationality,” that is, under the control of consciousness, the role of which is enhanced in socially significant situations, leads in people of this circle to psychosomatic disorders, mainly associated with the cardiovascular activity of the body. This type of response is usually reflected in the profile by a rise on the 2nd scale with a high 4th.

    A profile in which the 4th and 6th scales are moderately elevated is characteristic of a personality of a rational realistic type, which is hampered in the implementation of intentions by increased impulsiveness and nonconformism. If the peak on the 4th scale is combined with an increased 3rd, then this is rather an irrational realistic person whose pragmatism is higher than with an isolated peak on the 3rd scale, but low learning experience reduces the effectiveness of the efforts expended.

    High scores on the 4th scale (above 70T) reveal an excitable variant of accentuation, characterized by increased impulsivity. The properties listed above, revealed by an elevated 4th scale in a normal profile, are grotesquely sharpened here and are manifested by difficult self-control. Against the background of good intelligence, such individuals have the ability to take an unconventional approach to solving problems, to moments of creative insight, especially when a person is not dominated by normative dogmas and various kinds of restrictions. Insufficient reliance on experience is compensated by pronounced intuitiveness and speed of reactions.

    At the same time, a primitive, needy, immature personality with unjustifiably high ambitions, an individual who has nothing interesting in his soul, a lazy person, unable (or unwilling) to comprehend at least the basics of a general education course, trying to attract the attention of others through negative manifestations, violates the generally accepted style of behavior and neglects the moral principles of his environment. And then his behavior is no longer in quotation marks, but actually looks like hooliganism.

    Two equally high peaks of scales 2 and 4 reveal an internal conflict rooted in an initially contradictory type of response, which combines multidirectional tendencies - high search activity and dynamic arousal processes (4th) and pronounced inertia and instability (2nd). Psychologically, this is manifested by the presence of a contradictory combination of a high level of aspirations with self-doubt, high activity with rapid exhaustion. Under unfavorable social conditions, such a predisposition can serve as a basis for alcoholism or drug addiction, as well as for the development of certain psychosomatic disorders.

    This profile pattern to a certain extent reflects the traits of “type A” described by Jenkinson, who believes that this emotional-personal pattern represents the basis for the development of cardiovascular failure and a predisposition for early myocardial infarction.

    The combination of the 4th scale with the 6th at high scores reveals a hot-tempered type of reaction. The height of the peaks in the range of 70-75 T reflects the accentuation of the character according to the explosive type. Higher rates are characteristic of the psychopathic personality profile of the excitable circle with a tendency to impulsive aggressive reactions. If the personal characteristics inherent in this profile and manifested by a pronounced sense of competition, leadership traits, aggressiveness and stubbornness, are directed towards socially acceptable activities (for example, sports), then the bearer of these properties can remain sufficiently adapted mainly due to the social niche that is optimal for him.

    Low scores on the 4th scale indicate a decrease in achievement motivation, a lack of spontaneity, spontaneity of behavior, good self-control, unexpressed ambition, a lack of leadership traits and a desire for independence, adherence to generally accepted norms of behavior, and conformism. In everyday life they often say about such people: “No zest.” If such a decline in the profile on the 4th scale reflects a temporary decrease in the individual’s opposition to the environment, then this may be due to the fact that this individual finds himself in a situation where his “self” is blocked. For example, a person who has just received a new assignment experiences some self-doubt (an incompetence complex) and temporarily changes the strategy of behavior aimed at achieving a goal to a “trench”, wait-and-see policy.

    In general, individuals for whom the 4th scale determines the leading tendency are capable of not only actively realizing their own destiny, but also influencing the destinies of other people. However, this property is strongly dependent on how mature and independent of the individual’s momentary mood is the individual’s goal-setting. The passionate desire for self-realization in emotionally immature and intellectually undeveloped people of this type is so dissociated with real possibilities that sometimes it leaves these individuals no other path to self-affirmation other than the antisocial one, starting with a “struggle” with their own parents and school, ending with serious illegal acts.

    With sufficiently high intelligence, such people are able to achieve more than any other typological options. These are those independent-minded individuals who are able to dare, encroaching on established dogmas and old traditions - whether in the field of knowledge or in social foundations. The “rebellious spirit” can not only be destructive (if the foreground is the desire to deny at all costs the usefulness of the existing order and the protrusion of one’s “I”), but it can also be creative if it is a mature personality, a qualified specialist, an intelligent politician.

    Type “4” is a hostage to its difficult-to-control spontaneity of feelings - be it love, art, scientific or political activity. This tendency inevitably draws a person, like an uncontrollable horse - a rider, either to the heights of triumph, or to the abyss of fall. At times, the passion of nature, beyond the control of reason, leads a person to the edge of the abyss, and he is unable to do anything to oppose this passion. It often happens that it is precisely such passionate individuals who turn out to be the creators of history, carrying the crowd along with them with the light of their own burning heart. This heroism is not always romantic; it can also be a manifestation of a person’s self-centered intoxication with his special role.

    In their personal lives, they can appear both as noble romantic knights and as addicted flighty people. They are characterized by an eternal search for novelty, they are unlikely to sin with altruism, but they also take credit for this as a manifestation of sincerity and the absence of hypocrisy. Most often they have remarriages, change jobs several times, like to drink, scold the authorities, conflict with their superiors, remain childish until old age, are not always practical, often inconsistent, but at the same time they are sometimes charming. On this “soil” a personality pattern of a genius, hero, innovator, revolutionary, or a hooligan, anti-hero, extremist can be formed with equal success, but in any case - something far from the average, philistine type of personality.

    The need to be proud of oneself and to gain the admiration of others is an urgent need for individuals of this type, otherwise emotions are transformed into anger, contempt and protest. With this accentuation, there is a tendency towards increased aggressiveness, interpersonal conflict, frequent changes in mood, interests and attachments, touchiness, and a tendency to affect, especially in situations of infringement of self-esteem. Impulsivity predominates in decision making. Often - disregard for social and corporate norms and values. But a temporary rise on this scale may be due to some situational reason.

  • 5. Masculinity-femininity scale (Mf).

    The scale measures the degree to which a patient identifies with masculine or feminine role behaviors and is interpreted differently depending on the patient's gender. Elevated scores on the 5th scale in any profile mean a deviation from typical role behavior for a given gender and a complication of sexual interpersonal adaptation. Otherwise, the interpretation is polar, depending on whether the profile is female or male to be deciphered.

    The raw indicators of the 5th scale in the male version of the profile sheet are distributed in the same way as on other scales - from bottom to top (from 0 to 50 T), while on the female profile sheet they start from the top, going down to the maximum values.

    In the profile of men, an increase on the 5th scale is characterized by the presence of female character traits: sensitivity, vulnerability, the ability to subtly sense the nuances of interpersonal relationships, humanistic orientation of interests, passivity of the personal position (if other scales do not contradict this), humanistic orientation of interests, sentimentality, sophistication of taste , artistic and aesthetic orientation, the need for friendly harmonious relationships. This is an irrational, unrealistic personality, characterized by emotional warmth and infantilism (the same for women with a recessed 5th scale).

    In interpersonal relationships, a tendency to smooth out conflicts and restrain aggressive or antisocial tendencies is revealed even in those profiles where an elevated 5th scale is combined with equally elevated scales of the 4th, 6th or 9th.

    The elevated 5th scale in the normative profile of adolescents and young men is found quite often, reflecting only undifferentiated gender-role behavior and softness, unformed character, which makes them malleable material in the hands of an authoritarian-type leader and misleading during professional selection, when the choice is purely masculine. The young man’s profession is mainly of a hypercompensatory nature.

    With maturity, indicators of the 5th scale tend to decrease. During the aging period, violation of sexual adaptation is again reflected in an increase in the profile on the 5th scale; the same is observed in some chronic diseases accompanied by a decrease in libido, which was, in particular, noted in the study of patients with chronic tuberculosis.

    In women, high scores on the 5th scale reflect the traits of masculinity, independence, the desire for emancipation, and independence in decision-making. With a simultaneously elevated 5th and low 3rd scale, the absence of the flirtatiousness usually inherent in women, gentleness in communication, diplomacy in interpersonal contacts is revealed, and behavioral features characteristic of men are noted.

    A high 5th scale (above 70 T) is especially common among athletes involved in sports activities that are physically exhausting and affect the normal development of the body according to the female type. Features of the gender-role behavior of women with a high (70 T and above) 5th scale, together with an even higher 4th, acquire the features of a masculine style - with pronounced sexual concern, a pragmatic attitude to contacts based on purely physiological attraction, with a tendency to frequent changes sexual partners, with a lack of inclination to deep, emotional attachment, to constancy.

    Low scores on the 5th scale (below 50T) in a woman’s profile reflect an orthodox feminine style of gender-role behavior: the desire to be taken care of and find support in a husband, gentleness, sentimentality, love for children, commitment to family interests, inexperience and modesty in matters of sex.

  • 6. Paranoia, rigidity scale (Ra).

    Tendency to a rigid (inflexible) system in the approach to solving various life problems, slow changes in mood, and gradual accumulation of affect. Specific thinking, excessive detail and pedantry. The tendency to persistently and actively propagate one’s views and values, which is the cause of frequent conflicts with others. Often - an overestimation of one's own successes and achievements, forming a perfect idea of ​​exclusivity. Tendency to rivalry, jealousy, rancor, vindictiveness, and the formation of overvalued ideas of relationships.

    Being the only peak in the profile that does not go beyond the normal range, it reveals the stability of interests, perseverance in defending one’s own opinion, the activity of the position, which increases when counteracted by external forces, practicality, sober outlook on life, the desire to rely on one’s own experience, to areas of specific knowledge , to the exact sciences. Persons with a leading 6th scale in their profile show a love of accuracy, loyalty to their principles, straightforwardness and perseverance in upholding them.

    The ingenuity and rationality of the mind is combined with its insufficient flexibility and difficulties in switching in a suddenly changing situation. People in this circle are impressed by accuracy and specificity; they are irritated by amorphousness, uncertainty of goals, carelessness and carelessness of the people around them. This is a realistic, rational personality type, characterized by inflexible attitudes. It is common for people in this circle to devalue what is unattainable, as in the fable “The Fox and the Grapes,” that is, if what is desired is unattainable, then its value in the eyes of the individual decreases sharply.

    To a certain extent, they give the impression of being stress-resistant. However, at the same time, there is a gradual accumulation of potential activity, which later manifests itself in an explosion of affect and an aggressive coloring of activity, when a person gives vent to his anger, showing it in one form or another. Often people of this type attribute to others the distrust and hostility that is inherent in themselves, and are punished for this.

    In interpersonal contacts, individuals with a high level of the 6th scale exhibit a pronounced sense of rivalry, competitiveness, and a desire to defend a prestigious role. High emotional involvement with the dominant idea, the ability to “infect” others with one’s passion and a pronounced tendency to plan actions are the foundation for the formation of leadership traits, especially with good intelligence and high professionalism.

    Personalities of this type are often found among mathematicians, economists, technical engineers, accountants, business executives and in other types of professional activities where accuracy, calculation, and a systematic approach are especially required. A pronounced sense of competition and endurance to stress contributes to the success of such people in the sports field. Often in artist profiles there is a high peak on the 6th scale. And when among them you meet people with a high profile, in which the 6th and 8th scales are above 90T, and the 2nd scale is “recessed” (i.e. below 50T), then, looking at their peculiar and uncontrollable any correction in the style of one’s entire life, one involuntarily comes to the assumption that art for people of this type is the protective niche that saves them from madness. They are willful, unpredictable and persistent in their creative self-affirmation; periodically coming into conflict with their close circle and with official circles, they are doomed to a difficult fate. This is illustrated by the biographies of Rodin, Cezanne, Vangogh, Michel Angelo Buonarotti.

    Personal disharmony is characterized by a pronounced preoccupation with a dominant idea, which, as a rule, concerns a conflicting interpersonal situation. Pathological jealousy is most often found in people whose 6th scale scores are above 80 T. Also, a temporary rise on the 6th scale often appears in the profile of people in a pre-divorce situation.

    The fate of individuals with a decisive role of the 6th scale in their profile is always difficult. These are people who, as it were, “cause fire upon themselves.” Biased and not indifferent to the phenomena of life around them, they stubbornly defend their opinion as the only correct one. Obsessed with this or that idea, they are able to overcome many obstacles to its implementation. They contrast the turmoil and confusion of the world around them with their subjective idea of ​​organization and order. This is exactly the type of personality when the systematic implementation of plans proves that, despite the opposition of the environment, a person can be the creator of his own destiny. If the circumstances turn out to be stronger, then individuals of this type do not compromise and show opposition or hostility in various ways.

    Among them there are often militant fighters for the truth - as they imagine it, and, no matter how far it may be from the truth, they are capable of taking harmful actions (both for others and for themselves), when the losses may be disproportionate greater than the idea being defended is worth. Deprived of flexibility and agility, type “6” individuals easily make enemies for themselves, but if there are no enemies, then they are able to invent them and fight them, non-existent ones, since they do not trust anyone and are easily inflamed with hostility.

    Jealous in love, they are also jealous of others' success, which serves as the basis for the formation of a strong spirit of competition. Without forgiving offenses, people of this type can realize their revenge a long time later and in a very cruel way.

    Their aggressive reaction is always excessive in relation to the cause of the conflict. Let's say you insulted a person by calling him a fool. An individual of type “2” will say: “It’s sad, but this is probably true.”; type “3” will take you to a corner and whisper: “Quiet down, please: there’s absolutely no point in letting others know about this”; type “4” will reflect the blow with an instant reaction: “You are a fool!”; type “5” will babble sadly: “Well, why is it so rude, you could affectionately say - a fool,” and type “6” will become furious and come at you with his fists: “Oh, I’m a fool?!! So I’ll kill you!”

    Personalities of this type, with good professional experience, prove themselves to be the most effective organizers, for the time being they give the impression of being stress-resistant, and only in a situation that affects their power-hungry traits can they become maladapted, showing externally blaming reactions, hot temper and aggressiveness.

    In marriage they have conflicts, but at the same time they show thriftiness and devotion to the family. At work they show reformist zeal, accuracy and practicality, strive to command others and conflict with their superiors. In the sphere of public activity - whistleblowers of corruption, truth-seekers, organizers of opposition movements. Personalities of this type have left their mark in history as adherents of church dogmas (religious fans, representatives of the Jesuit Order), as reformer politicians or famous military leaders (for example, Napoleon).

    Profiles with a low 6th scale should be especially wary. It should be emphasized that indicators on the 6th scale below 50 T are implausible. If a high 6th is evidence of hostility, a moderately elevated level is evidence of resentment, and being at the average normative level is a sign of peacefulness, then low scores reflect an excessive tendency to emphasize one’s peacemaking tendencies, which is most often found with a hypercompensatory attitude in aggressive individuals.

  • 7. Scale of psychasthenia, anxiety (Pt).

    People of this type are characterized by excessive anxiety for any reason, indecisiveness and timidity in making decisions, and constant doubts about the correctness of the choice of decision and the goals set. They are characterized by a tendency to carefully double-check their actions and work done, an increased sense of guilt for the slightest failures and mistakes, suspiciousness, self-doubt, a mandatory focus on the opinion of the team (group), and adherence to generally accepted norms. They are prone to altruistic manifestations, acting at the maximum level of their capabilities, only to earn approval from others.

    An increase in the profile on the 7th scale reveals the predominance of a passive-passive position, lack of self-confidence and the stability of the situation, high sensitivity and susceptibility to environmental influences, increased sensitivity to danger. The prevailing motivation is to avoid failure and depend on the opinion of the majority.

    The leading needs are getting rid of fears and uncertainty, avoiding confrontation. They need spiritual consonance (consonance) with others. Characteristically, people of this type are distinguished by a developed sense of responsibility, conscientiousness, commitment, modesty, increased anxiety regarding minor everyday problems, and concern for the fate of loved ones. They are characterized by empathy, i.e. a feeling of compassion and empathy, increased nuance of feelings, pronounced dependence on the object of affection and any strong personality.

    There is pronounced sensitivity, a tendency to doubt, excessive self-criticism, low self-esteem, contrasting with an inflated ideal “I”. Reduced stress tolerance threshold. In a situation of stress - blocking or driven activity following the majority or leading personality.

    When choosing a profession, focus on the sphere of humanistic interests: literature, medicine, biology, history, as well as on the performing style of work outside of extensive contacts and with a fairly stable stereotype of activity, where the need to avoid stress is satisfied. Monotony is easily tolerated.

    The 7th scale reveals increased anxiety, and with indicators above 70 T, it is no longer a character trait that is determined, but a state. Persons in this circle are characterized by self-doubt, indecision, and a tendency to carefully recheck their actions and work done; very obligatory and responsible, they are distinguished by a dependent position, orientation towards the opinion of the group, a highly developed sense of duty and adherence to generally accepted norms, a tendency towards altruistic manifestations, conformity, a tendency to react with an increased sense of guilt and self-flagellation to the slightest failures and mistakes. Trying at all costs to avoid conflict, which they experience extremely painfully, psychasthenics act at the maximum level of their capabilities in order to earn the approval of others, and most importantly - what is even more difficult - their own approval.

    With an excessively self-critical attitude towards themselves, such persons are characterized by a large gap between the real and ideal “I”, i.e. there is a striving for an unattainable ideal. In this regard, they are constantly in a state of tension and dissatisfaction, manifested in obsessions, excessive restrictive actions, and rituals necessary for self-soothing.

    The state of maladjustment, reflected in the profile by an increase in the 7th scale, is characterized by sleep disturbances, obsessive fears, feelings of confusion, anxiety, and a feeling of impending disaster. The combination of high scores on the 7th and 3rd scales is typical for fixed fears (fear of riding in public transport, fear of moving away from home, fear of getting an incurable disease, fear of public speaking, etc.)

    The combination of a high 7th with a 6th may indicate a painful fixation on one’s ugliness or any external defects - real or imaginary. The combination of 7 and 8 (above 80 T-scores) reveals the mechanism of intellectual processing and restrictive behavior aimed at avoiding failure and manifested by the phenomena of obsession (obsessive actions, thoughts, rituals, fears). This reveals the problem of low self-esteem, a sense of one’s own imperfection, an increased sense of guilt, self-abasement, and an inferiority complex.

    The fate-determining tendency in the structure of the type “7” personality is fear of the power of Evil, helplessness in the face of brutal cruelty. If type “2” can be attributed to people of “distressed thoughts,” then type “7” is “a person of a shocked conscience. Not relying on their own strength and human kindness, they, more than others - not so much with their minds as with their hearts - gravitate towards religion, finding support and consolation in it. At the same time, they are not at all so weak: due to their soft character and high sensitivity not only to their own, but also to the pain of others, persons of this type have great mental strength and the ability to endure (passion-bearers)... This is expressed in their responsibility, in caring for others, the ability to understand and feel sorry for those who are in trouble.

    Due to their own defenselessness in the face of pragmatic assertiveness, they show compliance and do not pretend to a leading position. Remembering that a person can be harmonious only if there is positive self-esteem, it is easy to explain the constantly increased anxiety of persons of this type with unstable and low self-esteem. However, any person has a reason to evaluate himself as a person in positive characteristics.

    The individuality of such individuals manifests itself more clearly in a situation of acceptance and support from the environment. Despite the apparent sacrifice and humility, people who are excessively fixated on their torment thus show their egocentrism, which can irritate more balanced people around them. This leaves an imprint on relationships both at work and in the family (restless and insecure employee, anxious wife, overprotective mother).

    The social role of type “7” mainly comes down to conformism, the positive aspects of which are the protection of cultural and moral values ​​accumulated by society and generally accepted forms of behavior, law-abidingness and passive resistance to aggressive tendencies of the environment.

    Low scores on the 7th scale (below 45 T in the linear profile) indicate a lack of caution in actions and scrupulousness in matters of morality, rather naked egocentrism, a reduced ability to empathize, non-conformity of attitudes, a rude and harsh manner of behavior, a cynical view of life phenomena .

  • 8. Schizoid personality scale. (Sc).

    The schizoid type of behavior is manifested by a combination of increased sensitivity with emotional coldness and alienation in interpersonal relationships. Such people are characterized by pronounced intuitiveness, the ability to subtly feel and perceive abstract images. Everyday (everyday) joys and sorrows for them, as a rule, do not evoke the proper emotional response.

    They are prone to fantasy, focused on their subjective vision of the essence of phenomena, rather than on generally accepted, established, stereotyped ideas. Sometimes they have absurd and difficult to explain actions, strange and incomprehensible ideas and statements.

    Increased in profile with normative indicators on other scales, it reveals a separate-contemplative personal position, an analytical mindset; the tendency to think prevails over feelings and effective activity.

    Such people have a predominant abstract-analytical style of perception, manifested in the ability to recreate a holistic image based on minimal information, paying special attention to subjectively significant aspects that are more related to the world of their own fantasies than to reality. With good intelligence, individuals of this type are distinguished by creative orientation, originality of statements and judgments, originality of interests and hobbies.

    There is a certain selectivity in contacts, a certain subjectivity in assessing people and phenomena in the surrounding life, independence of views, a tendency towards abstraction, i.e. to generalizations and information abstracted from specifics and everyday life.

    It is more difficult for individuals in this circle to adapt to everyday forms of life and the prosaic aspects of everyday life. Their individuality is so pronounced that it is virtually useless to predict their statements and actions by comparing them with familiar stereotypes. They have an insufficiently formed realistic platform based on everyday experience; they are more focused on their subjectivity and intuition. Due to the fact that they are more rational than emotional, since they rely more on their judgments than on feelings, and, at the same time, are divorced from the reality of the world around them, they should be classified as rational, unrealistic individuals.

    What for the majority is a critical situation is often regarded differently by persons with a high 8th scale due to the uniqueness of their hierarchy of values. The situation, which they subjectively perceive as stress, causes a state of confusion.

    They are characterized by a professional attraction to activities of a free, creative style; they strive to avoid any formal framework or restricted types of work. Persons who gravitate towards the search for novelty, who show interest in the field of psychology, psychiatry, theosophy, and scientific research are distinguished by the presence in the SMIL profile of an increased 8th scale with accompanying increases of the 7th, 2nd or 5th, if they are theorists and humanists. People who choose various kinds of romantic professions - sailors, geologists, archaeologists, travelers and other adventure lovers - are characterized by profiles in which a high 8th scale is combined with a high 4th or 9th.

    Persons of this type are characterized by an imperative need for freedom of subjective choice in decision-making, in the absence of time restrictions, which can complicate their work adaptation given the lack of tolerance among others and the absence of a differentiated individual-personal approach among managers. Unlike other types of personalities, their individualism is only aggravated by opposition from the environment, which is manifested by increased signs of maladaptation and, consequently, an increase in the peak on the 8th scale.

    A profile with leading 8th and 7th scales (above 70 T) reveals internal tension, anxiety, nervousness, a tendency to endless, often fruitless, thinking about any problems (“mental chewing gum”), isolation, a chronically existing feeling of mental discomfort , uncertainty, decreased overall productivity, guilt and inferiority complex.

    The fate of the type “8” personality is most likely simply unpredictable and least of all depends on how the person himself plans to plan it. The individuality of a person of this type is especially unique. If other individual personality patterns have common features within the framework of their type of reaction, suggesting somewhat similar destinies, then this type of personality is each time unique in its own way, and therefore they are all not only different from others, but also have little in common with each other . Is it just that they are the most difficult to adapt to life, they are distinguished by the originality of their motivation and sphere of interests, which is largely away from everyday problems.

    They are sometimes mistakenly assessed as stress-resistant, and this is a serious misconception. It’s just that what worries most other people occupies an insignificant place in their hierarchy of values. If their true values ​​are affected, then extremely low stress resistance is revealed and maladjustment proceeds in the most irrational way. Therefore, type “8” individuals, deprived of the opportunity to fit into the social niche offered to them by circumstances, may turn out to be misunderstood, outcasts, eccentrics, who, without being taken seriously, are feared and avoided.

    Those of them who have extraordinary abilities evoke respect and admiration, bordering on mystical worship, since for an ordinary person they still remain a mystery.

    In their personal lives, they can be patiently adored, despite the fact that they are completely unsuited to family life: women like the “wives of the Decembrists,” believing in the higher purpose of their life partner, sacrifice both themselves and the well-being of the entire family for the sake of the one they worship . If the pedestal of greatness of such a “special person” collapses for some reason, he remains in splendid isolation.

    Most often, people of this type are lonely all their lives, sacrificing personal well-being for the sake of their special purpose. Due to their extremely high intuition and ability to think transcendentally (i.e., in global categories), among them there are often fortune tellers, psychics, healers who use alternative methods of treatment, specialists who deal with the mental state of a person: psychiatrists and psychologists, as well as theologians, philosophers, astrologers, populist psychotherapists, leaders of religious sects and informal social trends.

  • 9. Hypomania, optimism scale (Ma). The hyperthymic type of behavior is, regardless of the circumstances, high spirits, excessive activity, vigorous activity, “splashing over the edge” energy without a clear direction. Good communication skills (willingly and quickly establish contacts with other people). Constant desire to seek “thrills”. The desire to test yourself and your strengths in extreme and unusual situations. Orientation to work with frequent business trips, changes in teams and places of residence.

    However, interests, as a rule, are fleeting, superficial, and unstable. Everything quickly becomes boring; they lack endurance and perseverance. They are characterized by egocentrism, emotional immaturity, unreliability of moral attitudes and attachments. This scale reflects the activity of the position, a high level of love of life, self-confidence, positive self-esteem, a tendency to jokes and pranks, high achievement motivation, but focused more on motor mobility and speech hyperactivity than on specific goals.

    The mood is high, but in response to opposition, an angry reaction easily flares up and just as easily fades away. Success causes a certain exaltation, an emotion of pride. Everyday difficulties are perceived as easily surmountable, otherwise the significance of the unattainable is easily devalued.

    There is no inclination to seriously delve into complex problems, carelessness prevails, a joyful perception of the whole world around us and one’s existence, brightness of hopes, confidence in the future, conviction of one’s happiness.

    An elevated 9th scale defines accentuation as a hyperthymic or exalted type and reveals inflated self-esteem, ease of decision-making, lack of particular discernment in contacts, unceremonious behavior, a condescending attitude towards one’s mistakes and shortcomings, easily occurring emotional outbursts with quick reactivity, inconstancy in affections , excessive laughter, falling in love - in a word, characteristics that are completely natural for adolescence, but sound like a well-known infantilism for an adult.

    In a situation of stress, persons with a leading 9th scale in their profile show excessive, but not always purposeful activity, and can imitate an authoritative leading personality.

    They gravitate towards activities where they can realize physical and social activity, a craving for communication, and a desire to be visible. At the same time, satiety with monotony occurs quite quickly, a tendency to change the place or type of activity appears, which is usually driven by a feeling of failure, the desire to search for a better option or simply novelty.

    The properties revealed by the 9th scale can be life-altering only if maturity and a serious attitude towards life do not come to a person over the years: the play component in any areas of his activity remains dominant for the rest of his life, and the feeling never arises responsibility for yourself and loved ones. Typically, features characteristic of adolescence and early youth smooth out or disappear altogether in later years.

    An adult who belongs to type “9” is an incorrigible optimist, intoxicated by the joy of being: “the sea is knee-deep” and “jumping over one’s head” is a common thing for him. If something fails, then lies and boasting compensate for the damage caused to self-esteem, leaving it consistently high thanks to the powerful defense mechanism of “denial” of problems. Walking easily through life, personalities of this type are extremely sweet at a distance, but are incorrigibly irresponsible and unnecessary in family life and work.

    They can show sufficient (and even enviable) persistence and diligence only in activities that bring joy and completely coincide with their need for self-realization. Moreover, the desire to indulge immediate needs absolutely dominates any set aside goals and values ​​shifted to the future, which leads individuals of this type in their declining years to moral bankruptcy.

    Low scores on the 9th scale indicate a decrease in the level of optimism, love of life and activity. If there is a peak on the 2nd scale, then this profile reflects a particularly deep depressive mood (as a rule, the 0th scale is quite high), but if the peak on the 4th scale is also high, then due to increased impulsiveness Suicidal risk (S-risk) is especially pronounced here.

  • 0 Social Introversion Scale (Si) indicates a tendency to limit social contacts. These people have certain difficulties in establishing interpersonal contacts and are focused on communicating within a narrow circle of friends and acquaintances. This scale reveals the passivity of the personal position and a greater focus of interests in the world of internal experiences (than outside) with increased and high scores on the 0th scale.

    An increase in the 0th scale reflects a decrease in the level of inclusion in the social environment and reveals a certain isolation and shyness. In a situation of stress - inhibition, avoidance of contacts, escape from problems into loneliness.

    High indicators reflect not only isolation and taciturnity, but are often a sign of internal disharmony and a way of hiding the originality of one’s character and awkwardness in communication from others. Sometimes, at first glance, these people can give the impression of being quite sociable, but this comes at the cost of significant stress, which only they themselves know about. They rarely act as a leader.

    The fate of a person of type “0” is strongly dependent on any other leading tendency, since the signs inherent in the 0th scale in their pure form are characteristic only of a person who has completely moved away from the “worldly vanity”, a hermit who has refused any contact with the surrounding world.

    If the 0th scale is the only peak in the profile, then for women this indicates modesty, commitment to family interests, social compliance, and for men it indicates inertia, subjectivism, irritability, and isolation.

    Low scores on the 0th scale, on the contrary, demonstrate not only sociability and lack of shyness, but also ease in flaunting their characterological characteristics. Data on the 0th scale below 40 T reveal illegibility in contacts, excessive sociability, bordering on importunity with a high 9th scale in the profile.

  • Adaptation and restandardization MMPI in domestic conditions was carried out by the author of this manual during 1968 - 1984. Much work has been done to translate and adapt the text of the statements. The significance of some of them has pronounced differences depending on the cultural and ethnic characteristics of the population. The frequency of normative responses was also studied in a comparative analysis of American and Russian data. All this was taken into account when forming the final version SMIL.

    After all the changes, the survey results of more than a thousand individuals, presented in the form of equally selected groups by gender and age, educational level and type of professional employment, were entered into the computer. Statistical processing of data and comparative analysis of the results of psychodiagnostic research with data from objective observation (sometimes over many years) confirmed the reliability of the technique and a wide range of its capabilities, especially in the field of studying individual personality traits.

    The technique is a booklet containing 566 statements. If answers are received to 566 questions-statements (full version), then the result reveals not only the profile SMIL, which gives, when interpreted, a portrait of the individual, but also indicators of almost 200 additional scales that play a clarifying role. The shortened version contains 398 statements. It allows you to get a personal portrait on basic scales, but does not provide information on additional scales.

    Why does the questionnaire contain statements rather than questions? Because a person answers questions of interest to a psychologist more sincerely if they are in the form of a statement. In such a situation, a person feels as if alone with himself, analyzing his “I,” and this promotes greater frankness than the interrogative form, which sounds like an interrogation. The responses of the subject are entered into the cells of the registration sheet (see Appendix). If the subject agrees and answers “True” to a certain item in the questionnaire booklet, he puts a cross at the top of the box with the number corresponding to the statement; if his answer is “False”, then a cross is placed below the statement number in the corresponding cell of the registration sheet. The answer “Don't know” is recorded as a circle around the corresponding number.

    Statements are of a different nature, depending on what area of ​​​​human problems they cover. Most of them are aimed at identifying character traits and the style of communication with others. The statements relate to the subjective preferences of the person being examined, his views on different life values. They also reveal the characteristics of emotional reactions, background mood, assessment of one’s own well-being, a number of specific physiological functions, etc. It is not the sentiment of the statement itself that is important. This is just a standard set of experimentally simulated situations to which different people react differently. What is important is the selectivity of the answers, which outlines the individual and personal properties of a particular person. By summing up information on significant answers, a formalized calculation procedure reveals the degree of agreement or deviation of a particular individual’s answers from the statistically calculated average norm. Subsequently, “rivulets” of values ​​of individual scales are collected into the “sea” of information provided by a holistic profile.

    The translation of the questionnaire text was carried out with the help of qualified philologists who are well aware of the intricacies of word usage and the construction of phrases, idiomatic expressions and aphorisms in both English (American) and Russian. The translation was improved 9(!) times after regular testing of the test on various contingents of the domestic population. Frequency of normative responses of Americans, given in the Handbook of MMPI, was compared with the answers of a representative group of Russians. consisting of 860 people for whom Russian is the language in which they not only speak, but also think. The readaptation of the questionnaire concerned not only the accuracy of the translation, but also the adequacy of the statements in relation to the desired psychological phenomena, which they were aimed at identifying. The results of the first stages of test restandardization were published in 1976 (Sobchik L.N., Gissen L.D. Methodological manual. “Standardized method of personality research SMIL and the experience of its use for the purpose of individualizing sports activities”, Moscow, VNIIFK) and in 1978 (Sobchik L.N., Lukyanova N.A., Manual for doctors. “Studying the psychological characteristics of flight personnel using a standardized method of personality research”, Moscow, Air Force). Subsequently, some statements were changed due to the characteristics of the domestic population and a different lifestyle in our country compared to America. In particular, this concerns attitudes towards religion, common expressions, slang, and idioms. In addition, in the modified version of the test, 26 statements from the questionnaire were identified that turned out to be ballast: they not only misled and shocked the subjects, but also provoked inadequate responses. Basically, these are statements that “work” on the reliability scale “F” and the 8th scale of schizophrenia. Thus, the statement “I often see people, animals and other objects that other people around me do not see” provoked the answer “true” from those who, by occupation (for example, athletes) travel a lot to different countries, while the statement aimed at identifying perceptual disorders. In the questionnaire, these statements are left to preserve the usual numbering, but they are excluded from the calculation. Repeated re-standardization of the technique was carried out on a representative group of 580 men and 280 women. Uniformity was observed in the choice of age groups (from 16 to 70 years old) and by type of professional activity: “technical people” and “humanists”, “physicists” and “lyricists”, athletes and artists, people of physical and mental work were equally represented. The work carried out to adapt and restandardize the test led to the fact that the psychological significance of the questionnaire items became adequate to the original, and the norm corridor and peaks of deviations corresponded to the basic requirements of the MMP1 test. This achieves the possibility of comparative data analysis SMIL

    As a result of the work carried out, domestic standards were obtained for both basic and additional scales (see Appendix). These data have been published in every reissue since 1990 (Sobchik L.N. “Methods of psychological diagnostics. Standardized multifactorial method of personality research.” Methodological manual. Moscow, MCC at the State Administration of Technical Relations of the Moscow City Executive Committee.)

    Questionnaires in a modified form are divided into male, female and adolescent versions, the difference of which is reflected only in the form of presentation of some statements. The keys (see Appendix) with which raw scores are calculated on each scale, the correction of raw indicators to form a personality profile in standard T indicators, as well as the interpretation scheme are identical for all forms of the questionnaire except for some differences in the processing of data on the 5th scale in men and the female profile and those aspects of interpretation that are associated with age characteristics.

    The examination procedure should be carried out in a calm environment, allowing the subject to concentrate. At the same time, you sometimes need to hurry him up, not give him the opportunity for long thoughts - the first immediate reaction is important. If the subject asks for clarification, then it should be given only in relation to individual words. The meaning of the statements should not be interpreted, since everyone must understand them in their own way. You just need to make it clear that denial or agreement with the statement cannot be regarded as either a positive or a negative moment in assessing their personal qualities. A person should not feel afraid that the examination may in any way harm him. Therefore, it must be emphasized that this examination is necessary for a more differentiated (individualized) approach in the educational process or in professional activities, as well as for choosing the most effective drug treatment or psychotherapeutic influence, etc. It is worth emphasizing that the study is not aimed at identifying the social aspects of human behavior , but more concerned with his temperament, the properties of the nervous system. In some circumstances, it should be said that this examination is customary for everyone, that is the order. Statements that questions are repeated, that many of them are stupid, are often associated with defensive tendencies, with a reluctance to be frank with strangers. On the one hand, such a reaction may be the result of the psychologist’s imperative behavior and the lack of necessary preliminary work with the population being examined. On the other hand, the following comment is possible: “Yes, this is how it should be! Repetitions are provided to check your attentiveness and to avoid negligence in filling out the registration sheet.”

    Before the examination, the subject must study the instructions given below.

    You will be presented with a whole series of different statements. When evaluating each of them, do not spend a lot of time thinking. The first immediate reaction is the most natural. Carefully read the text, reading each statement to the end and evaluating it all as true or false in relation to you. If your answer is “true,” then put a cross on the registration sheet above the corresponding questionnaire number.

    If your answer is “wrong,” then put a cross under the corresponding number.

    Pay attention to statements with double negatives: for example, “I have never had seizures with convulsions”: if I haven’t, then your answer is “true,” and, conversely, if this has happened to you, then the answer is “wrong.”

    Some statements in the questionnaire sound like this: “Circle the number of this statement.” In this case, the number corresponding to this statement should be circled on the registration sheet (this is to check your attentiveness).

    If some statements raise serious doubts, base your answer on what is presumably more characteristic of you. If a statement is true for you in some situations and false in others, then choose the answer that is most appropriate at the moment. Only as a last resort, if the statement does not apply to you at all, you can circle the number of this statement on the registration sheet, which is equivalent to the answer “I don’t know.” However, an excess of circles on the registration sheet will also lead to unreliable results.

    Try to answer sincerely, otherwise your answers will be recognized as unreliable and the survey will have to be repeated. When answering different points of the questionnaire, try to understand - “What kind of person am I really?” Then the data obtained can be used with a positive effect for you. The results of the examination are not aimed at assessing your personality from the point of view of whether you are a “bad” person or a “good” person: only the characteristics of your temperament and professionally important qualities are revealed.

    When answering even fairly intimate questions, do not be embarrassed, since no one will read or analyze your answers: all data processing is carried out automatically. The experimenter does not have access to specific answers, receiving results only in the form of generalized indicators that may be interesting and useful for you.

    Answer questions about personal data in a free or even anonymous form by prior agreement with the psychologist examining you.

    Restandardization showed that the strict choice of the norm group made it possible to preserve the previously developed normative spread on the profile sheet. The main direction of readaptation of the methodology was associated with the qualitative improvement of the psychological significance of the questionnaire items in such a way that the norm corridor and peaks of deviations were adequate to the basic requirements of the MMP1 test. This creates a basis for comparative data analysis SMIL with the results of research by foreign authors.

    The survey results are processed by sequentially imposing keys, each of which corresponds to one or another scale of the basic profile (or additional scale). The keys are made from a profile sheet on which significant answers to be calculated are highlighted. In this case, the corresponding “windows” are cut out - above the number if the significant answer is “True”, below the number if the answer is “False”. Each key is sequentially applied to the completed profile sheet and the crosses shown through the cut-out windows, marked by the subject, are counted. In the following, these results are called raw scores. For the basic profile there are 13 of them: three of them are confidence scales and ten are basic scales. After correcting the raw results by certain fractions of the “K” correction scale, standardized “T” scores are obtained.

    In connection with the readaptation of the methodology and the expansion of the scope of its application, most of the basic scales of the methodology were given new names corresponding to their psychological essence, respectively: 1st scale - the scale of “neurotic overcontrol”, 2nd - “pessimism”, 3rd - “ emotional lability”, 4th – “impulsivity”, 6th – “rigidity”, 7th – “anxiety”, 8th – “individualism”, 9th – “optimism and activity”. The names of two scales have not changed: 5th – the “femininity-masculinity” scale and 0th – the “social introversion” scale. As for almost two hundred additional scales that are not included in the construction of a personality profile, their names did not change after restandardization. These scales, compared to the profile of the basic scales, are much easier to interpret; basically, their essence is reflected by the very name of each scale. They have been developed by different authors in connection with different applied problems and can be used in addition to the main profile scales. As for the basic scales, they form a holistic personality profile, reflecting a portrait of the individual in all its complexity and diversity. Additional scales only add to this portrait a certain quality, which, refracted through a personal image, can acquire one or another sound. A number of additional scales are aimed at clarifying the extent to which certain indicators indicating emotional stress are associated with deviation from the norm. They help to understand a complex problem: whether the detected deviations are a sign of severe stress or mental pathology.

    Profile SMIL- this is the broken line that connects the quantitative indicators of 10 basic scales. “Raw” scores for each scale are the sum of the crosses calculated by applying the template key to the registration sheet filled out by the person being examined (see Practical Guide). To each profile scale SMIL has its own key. The indicator of each scale is assessed by the sum of significant (counted) cross answers, reflecting not only agreement (the answer is “True” - the cross is above the statement number on the registration sheet), but also denial (the answer is “False” - the cross is placed below the number in the corresponding cell of the registration sheet ).

    The calculation of raw scores for each key (i.e. scale) must be carried out very carefully, repeating the calculation up to two matching results. The scale of the registration sheet and template keys must be absolutely identical. When placing the key on the registration sheet, the frame, outline and numbers must completely match. Incorrect scoring will cause all subsequent interpretations to be distorted or completely incorrect. The resulting raw scores are entered on the first line below the frame of the profile sheet. The indicators of the main ten profile scales are adjacent in the foreground (on the left) to a small profile of reliability scales: the “?” scale. shows how many of the questionnaire statements fell into the “don’t know” response category. The “L” scale—the “Lie” scale—shows how sincere the subject was during the testing process. The “F” scale—the “reliability” scale—shows the level of reliability of the data obtained, depending on his frankness and willingness to cooperate. The “K” scale - the “correction” scale reveals the degree of distortion of the profile, associated both with the subject’s closedness and with the influence of the unconscious defense mechanism of “repressing” from the psyche information that is traumatic and destroys the positive image of the “I”. Depending on the indicators of the reliability scales, the profile is recognized as reliable or unreliable, and its features are considered through the prism of the subject’s attitudes towards the examination procedure.

    To avoid too strong an influence of the displacement mechanism on the main profile, you should add 0.5 of the sum of the raw points (s.b.) of the “K” scale indicator to the raw points of the 1st scale, then add 0.4 of the s.b. value. scale “K” to s.b. 4th scale, in whole (1.0) “K” - the entire amount of s.b. scale “K” - added to s.b. 7th and 8th scales, and finally 0.2 s.b. scale “K” is added to s.b. 9th scale. To ensure that the indicated fractions of “K” do not differ between different researchers during mathematical rounding, to the right of the profile space there is a table of rounded indicators 0.4, 0.5 and 0.2 for any values ​​of s.b. "K" scale. These indicators are written on additional lines under the raw scores of the corresponding scales (1st, 4th, 7th, 8th and 9th) and are summed up with them, after which the final (corrected) raw scores for all scales. Then, the final raw scores are displayed in vertical gradations of different scales according to their designation (?, L, F, K) or number (from 1 to 0). Raw scores for each scale are indicated - in the form of a bold dot (or asterisk) - on the profile sheet graph, and these points are connected to each other by a broken line, the reliability scales are separate, and the main (basic) profile is separately.

    Due to the fact that the number of significant answers (crosses) on each scale is not the same and their statistical significance (price, cost) is also not equivalent, comparison of indicators on different scales is possible only by reducing the raw scores to a generalized, standardized unit. Such a unit in this technique is the walls, each of which contains 10 T points and is equal to the standard deviation from the average standard line, which represents 50 T on the profile sheet. This is an empirically identified average norm. Deviation within 2 standard deviations (s) - 20 T - both up, up to 70, and down, up to 30 T, is conventionally defined as a spread within the normative corridor. Indicators above 70 and below 30 T are regarded as a deviation from the norm. Data in T-points are shown on both the right and left side lines of the frame of the profile sheet and are determined by lines drawn horizontally at a distance of 10 T points from each other. To more accurately determine the T-score for each scale, you should draw a horizontal line (or attach a ruler) from the raw score to the T scale. T-score indicators for any raw score for each specific scale were calculated in advance using the formula:

    where 50 is the “norm” line, from which indicators are measured both upward (increase) and downward (decrease); X is the final raw result obtained on a certain scale; M is the median empirically identified during the process of restandardizing the methodology, that is, the average normative indicator on this scale; s - sigma, the value of the standard deviation from the norm, discovered during the standardization process. For basic scales, all this data is already taken into account and correlated with T-scores on the profile sheet. For additional scales, T-score indicators are calculated using the above formula using data on the average statistical indicators of median and sigma obtained as a result of restandardization of the methodology. These data should be found in the Appendix, which also provides questionnaires - male, female and adolescent, samples of profile sheets (male and female), as well as a registration sheet and keys to basic and additional scales. Practical mastery of the methodology is much faster and easier during the training process, which is systematically conducted at the Institute of Applied Psychology in the form of advanced training courses and in the form of individual consultations with specialists - psychologists, doctors, sociologists and teachers.

    As mentioned above, the spread of indicators in the range from 30 to 70 T determines the normal range. However, experience has shown that the distribution of quantitative indicators in this test is uneven and the so-called “Gaussian curve”, reflecting the patterns of this distribution, is “wrong” in nature. This is manifested by the lack of symmetry of increases and decreases in profile peaks in the normal corridor. In the presence of signs of sharpened personality traits and other deviations from the norm, we much more often observe an increase in test scores. A decrease in profile, as a rule, is quantitatively less pronounced and is more often associated with the test person’s setting to hypernormal responses in the so-called “recessed” profiles (see below). The entire data calculation procedure requires accuracy, precision and attention. It is best when the psychologist has the opportunity to transfer this routine work to a computer. The manuals developed by the author together with programmers S.S. Kurapov and K.G. Kanin, computer versions of the test completely free the psychologist from any calculations. At the same time, the interpretive part of the program is such that, in addition to a comprehensive portrait of a personality, it will insure even a novice psychologist against serious mistakes, will help to give specific recommendations of a different kind, depending on the scope and objectives of using the methodology, and will also serve as a reliable tool in scientific research work (see. book Psychology of Individuality Theory and practice of psychodiagnostics Sobchik L.N., S.-Pb. Rech, 2003).

    Counting the spread of profile indicators SMIL comes from 50 T - the “ideal-normative” average profile, corresponding to the theoretical averaged norm (see profile sheet in the Appendix chapter). In a narrow corridor of the norm - within 46 - 55 T - profile fluctuations are difficult to interpret, since they do not reveal sufficiently pronounced individual personality properties and are characteristic of a completely balanced personality (if the reliability scales do not show a pronounced attitude towards lying - a high scale "L" - or lack of frankness - high "K" scale). In a wide norm corridor (from 30 to 70 T) in the norm profile, each tendency is opposed by an “anti-tendency” that is opposite in direction, and feelings and behavior are subject to the control of consciousness (or are so moderate that minimal control over them is quite sufficient). Increases ranging from 56 to 66 T reveal those leading trends that determine the characterological characteristics of the individual. Higher indicators of different basic scales (67-75 T) highlight those accentuated features that at times complicate a person’s socio-psychological adaptation. Indicators above 75 T indicate impaired adaptation and a deviation of the individual’s state from normal. These may be psychopathic character traits, a state of stress caused by an extreme situation, neurotic disorders and, finally, psychopathology, the presence of which can only be judged by a pathopsychologist or psychiatrist based on the totality of data from psychodiagnostic, experimental psychological and clinical research.

    The profile sheets of the adult and teenage versions have quantitative differences only depending on the gender of the subject. Age differences are taken into account when analyzing profile data, as discussed in the interpretation section. It is very important that before starting work, the specialist makes sure that the questionnaire itself, the keys, the profile sheets, and, finally, the interpretive approach belong to the same author. SMIL different from the original test MMPI, and from that developed at the All-Russian Research Institute of Neurology and Psychiatry named after. V.M. Bekhterev Standardized Clinical Questionnaire SKLO and adapted by F.B. Berezin and M.P. Miroshnikov MMIL. Incomparable in all respects with all options MMPI questionnaire for 71 statements, clinically oriented Mini-cartoon, developed by the Swedish psychologist Kincannon and adapted in the Russian version by V.P. Zaitsev and V.N. Kozyulei SMOL. This technique is best used for screening to identify patients in need of medical care and for use in psychosomatic hospitals.

    As experience shows, the methodology is mainly designed for examining a contingent of adults (from 16 to 80 years old) with at least 6-7 years of education in secondary school), with intact intelligence. Due to the fact that the author of the book, together with teachers B.N. Kodess and T.V. Kodess, developed and adapted a teenage version in 1984 SMIL, the scope of application of the technique has expanded somewhat. If the usual adult version has been widely and effectively used for many years in the practice of career counseling when examining high school students aged 15-17 years, then the teenage version has been successfully used in recent years when studying younger children, starting from the age of 12 (subject to good general development). It is noted that unreliable results are often directly dependent not so much on the subject’s distorted attitude towards the examination, but on a poor understanding of the content of the statements. This may be due, firstly, to underdeveloped verbal intelligence, and secondly, to poor knowledge of the Russian language. Therefore, in regions where people speak a different language, the methodology should be translated into their native language, but it is also necessary to restandardize the quantitative basis of the methodology, since regulatory standards may differ due to regional cultural and ethnic characteristics.

    The analysis of the results obtained is based not on studying the meaning of the subject’s answers, but on a statistical procedure for calculating data, during which the quantitative dispersion of different answer options is revealed in relation, on the one hand, to the average normative average, and on the other, to the pathological sharpness of the psychological factor, which represents one or another individual-personal tendency. Most of the statements sound so that the subject, when answering, does not always understand how this characterizes him, which significantly complicates the desire to “improve” or “worse” the results of the examination. At first glance, the technique allows us to outline the subjective internal picture of the “I” of the person being examined. In reality, thanks to the partly projective sound of many statements, the experiment also reveals those psychological aspects that are not realized by a person or are only partially amenable to the control of consciousness. Therefore, only with statistically unreliable data is the personality profile distorted so much that it makes no sense to interpret it. Within the framework of reliable data, even in the presence of trends that partially influence the strengthening or smoothing of the profile pattern, the interpretation reflects a picture of the personality that is close to the true one. At the same time, a very differentiated gradation of the degree of expression of different personal characteristics in their complex combination is possible, when not only high indicators are taken into account, but also their relationship with low indicators. At the same time, a deviation from the average normative indicators, more than twice the mean square error, reveals an excessive degree of expression of a particular personality trait, taking it beyond a fairly wide (from 30 to 70 standard T points) corridor of normative variation. Such data, as already mentioned, do not necessarily indicate pathology. A difficult life situation, traumatic events, physical illness - all this can cause a state of temporary maladjustment.

    Therefore, the interpretation of the data obtained must be carried out in accordance with all the information available about the subject, not to mention the fact that for an adequate idea of ​​the subject it does not hurt to look at him. “Blind” interpretation can only be used for research purposes, when the reliability of the methodology is checked, as well as in large-scale surveys, when not the personality of an individual is interpreted, but some generalized trends of large groups.

    The person being tested may claim certain information about the test results. Sometimes such an interview carries psychotherapeutic or recommendatory content. If this happens, then the experimental psychologist or consultant is obliged first of all to respect the interests of the person being examined and never interpret the survey data to his detriment, since the role of the psychologist in society mainly comes down to protecting the person in every sense of the word. If this rule is violated, people will lose confidence in the psychologist and further psychological research will become impossible. The rest follows from this: the interpretation of the data obtained should be carried out from the standpoint of a psychotherapeutic, gentle approach. Each individual personal property usually carries both positive and negative information. Therefore, it is always possible to start an interview by highlighting positive characteristics, and then, against this background, highlight those characteristics and personality traits that create certain difficulties and negatively affect a person’s fate. But this should be done carefully and precisely in the style that is optimal for a given individual: you should pay attention to those recommendations for a correctional approach that are given below, depending on the characteristics of the profile.

    Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is a technique created in 1940 by S. Hathway and J. McKinley at the University of Minnesota, which remains one of the most common over the past 50 years. The test was originally developed for the purpose of professional selection of pilots during the Second World War - it is used to study the level of adaptation and study the persistent professionally important inclinations of the employee.

    How was the MMPI questionnaire developed?

    The methodology was developed as follows: it contained special questions that could identify ordinary people and people with certain psychological symptoms. During the development process, scientists took hysterics, psychotics, and depressively ill people, observed their answers to questions and, based on the distribution of answers, created special scales with which one can judge normality or pathology.

    Subsequently, the questionnaire was improved to study specifically personality characteristics that are not similar to clinical manifestations. As a result, the scales were renamed, and a remarkable test for identifying personality traits was obtained.

    In the 1960s, scientists worked on adapting the MMPI to domestic reality. Researchers worked in this direction for a long time, and as a result, the questions and answer options were recalibrated. Changes in the methodology were carried out at the Leningrad Psychoneurological Institute named after. V.M. Bekhterev, and the last major changes were made by L.N. Sobchik. In 1971, a new version was introduced - the SMIL test (Standardized Multifactor Method for Personality Research).

    What does he look like today?

    It consists of a large number of statements. Answer options are presented in three types: “True”, “False” and “I don’t know”. When working with statements, you should not think long about the answer. The questions must be answered honestly, otherwise the completed test will be considered unreliable. The presented method has a lie scale, and if the results are high, then the test will have to be repeated.

    What can you find out with this test?

    This test makes it possible to obtain a multidisciplinary personality portrait, which includes the following components: motivational orientation, character traits, suicidal tendencies, driving needs, predisposition to alcoholism, defense mechanisms, presence of sexual problems, etc.

    Analysis of results

    The results of this test are calculated using 13 scales. Let's get acquainted with the first 3 scales:

    1. Lie scale (L) – high scores on this scale indicate an unreliable personality profile, in which case it is better to take the test again. If the indicators, on the contrary, are low, then this indicates the reliability of the individual’s results.
    2. Reliability scale (F) - it shows how honest the test taker's answers were. High scores on this scale indicate that a person is overly critical of himself.
    3. Correction scale (K) – the criterion of this scale is the individual’s desire to adjust his answer options in accordance with the social norms of people.

    Header image -

    Return

    ×
    Join the “koon.ru” community!
    In contact with:
    I am already subscribed to the community “koon.ru”