Mixed fractions, just like simple fractions, can be subtracted. To subtract mixed numbers of fractions you need to know several subtraction rules. Let's study these rules with examples.
Subtracting mixed fractions with like denominators.
Let's consider an example with the condition that the integer being reduced and the fractional part are greater than the integer and fractional parts being subtracted, respectively. Under such conditions, subtraction occurs separately. We subtract the integer part from the whole part, and the fractional part from the fractional part.
Let's look at an example:
Subtract mixed fractions \(5\frac(3)(7)\) and \(1\frac(1)(7)\).
\(5\frac(3)(7)-1\frac(1)(7) = (5-1) + (\frac(3)(7)-\frac(1)(7)) = 4\ frac(2)(7)\)
The correctness of the subtraction is checked by addition. Let's check the subtraction:
\(4\frac(2)(7)+1\frac(1)(7) = (4 + 1) + (\frac(2)(7) + \frac(1)(7)) = 5\ frac(3)(7)\)
Let's consider an example with the condition when the fractional part of the minuend is less than the corresponding fractional part of the subtrahend. In this case, we borrow one from the whole in the minuend.
Let's look at an example:
Subtract mixed fractions \(6\frac(1)(4)\) and \(3\frac(3)(4)\).
The minuend \(6\frac(1)(4)\) has a smaller fractional part than the fractional part of the subtrahend \(3\frac(3)(4)\). That is, \(\frac(1)(4)< \frac{1}{3}\), поэтому сразу отнять мы не сможем. Займем у целой части у 6 единицу, а потом выполним вычитание. Единицу мы запишем как \(\frac{4}{4} = 1\)
\(\begin(align)&6\frac(1)(4)-3\frac(3)(4) = (6 + \frac(1)(4))-3\frac(3)(4) = (5 + \color(red) (1) + \frac(1)(4))-3\frac(3)(4) = (5 + \color(red) (\frac(4)(4)) + \frac(1)(4))-3\frac(3)(4) = (5 + \frac(5)(4))-3\frac(3)(4) = \\\\ &= 5\frac(5)(4)-3\frac(3)(4) = 2\frac(2)(4) = 2\frac(1)(4)\\\\ \end(align)\)
Next example:
\(7\frac(8)(19)-3 = 4\frac(8)(19)\)
Subtracting a mixed fraction from a whole number.
Example: \(3-1\frac(2)(5)\)
The minuend 3 does not have a fractional part, so we cannot immediately subtract. Let's borrow one from the whole part of 3, and then do the subtraction. We will write the unit as \(3 = 2 + 1 = 2 + \frac(5)(5) = 2\frac(5)(5)\)
\(3-1\frac(2)(5)= (2 + \color(red) (1))-1\frac(2)(5) = (2 + \color(red) (\frac(5 )(5)))-1\frac(2)(5) = 2\frac(5)(5)-1\frac(2)(5) = 1\frac(3)(5)\)
Subtracting mixed fractions with unlike denominators.
Let's consider an example with the condition that the fractional parts of the minuend and subtrahend have different denominators. You need to bring it to a common denominator, and then perform subtraction.
Subtract two mixed fractions with different denominators \(2\frac(2)(3)\) and \(1\frac(1)(4)\).
The common denominator will be the number 12.
\(2\frac(2)(3)-1\frac(1)(4) = 2\frac(2 \times \color(red) (4))(3 \times \color(red) (4) )-1\frac(1 \times \color(red) (3))(4 \times \color(red) (3)) = 2\frac(8)(12)-1\frac(3)(12 ) = 1\frac(5)(12)\)
Related questions:
How to subtract mixed fractions? How to solve mixed fractions?
Answer: you need to decide what type the expression belongs to and apply the solution algorithm based on the type of expression. From the integer part we subtract the integer, from the fractional part we subtract the fractional part.
How to subtract a fraction from a whole number? How to subtract a fraction from a whole number?
Answer: you need to take a unit from an integer and write this unit as a fraction
\(4 = 3 + 1 = 3 + \frac(7)(7) = 3\frac(7)(7)\),
and then subtract the whole from the whole, subtract the fractional part from the fractional part. Example:
\(4-2\frac(3)(7) = (3 + \color(red) (1))-2\frac(3)(7) = (3 + \color(red) (\frac(7 )(7)))-2\frac(3)(7) = 3\frac(7)(7)-2\frac(3)(7) = 1\frac(4)(7)\)
Example #1:
Subtract a proper fraction from one: a) \(1-\frac(8)(33)\) b) \(1-\frac(6)(7)\)
Solution:
a) Let's imagine one as a fraction with a denominator 33. We get \(1 = \frac(33)(33)\)
\(1-\frac(8)(33) = \frac(33)(33)-\frac(8)(33) = \frac(25)(33)\)
b) Let's imagine one as a fraction with a denominator 7. We get \(1 = \frac(7)(7)\)
\(1-\frac(6)(7) = \frac(7)(7)-\frac(6)(7) = \frac(7-6)(7) = \frac(1)(7) \)
Example #2:
Subtract a mixed fraction from a whole number: a) \(21-10\frac(4)(5)\) b) \(2-1\frac(1)(3)\)
Solution:
a) Let’s borrow 21 units from the integer and write it like this \(21 = 20 + 1 = 20 + \frac(5)(5) = 20\frac(5)(5)\)
\(21-10\frac(4)(5) = (20 + 1)-10\frac(4)(5) = (20 + \frac(5)(5))-10\frac(4)( 5) = 20\frac(5)(5)-10\frac(4)(5) = 10\frac(1)(5)\\\\\)
b) Let's take one from the integer 2 and write it like this \(2 = 1 + 1 = 1 + \frac(3)(3) = 1\frac(3)(3)\)
\(2-1\frac(1)(3) = (1 + 1)-1\frac(1)(3) = (1 + \frac(3)(3))-1\frac(1)( 3) = 1\frac(3)(3)-1\frac(1)(3) = \frac(2)(3)\\\\\)
Example #3:
Subtract an integer from a mixed fraction: a) \(15\frac(6)(17)-4\) b) \(23\frac(1)(2)-12\)
a) \(15\frac(6)(17)-4 = 11\frac(6)(17)\)
b) \(23\frac(1)(2)-12 = 11\frac(1)(2)\)
Example #4:
Subtract a proper fraction from a mixed fraction: a) \(1\frac(4)(5)-\frac(4)(5)\)
\(1\frac(4)(5)-\frac(4)(5) = 1\\\\\)
Example #5:
Calculate \(5\frac(5)(16)-3\frac(3)(8)\)
\(\begin(align)&5\frac(5)(16)-3\frac(3)(8) = 5\frac(5)(16)-3\frac(3 \times \color(red) ( 2))(8 \times \color(red) (2)) = 5\frac(5)(16)-3\frac(6)(16) = (5 + \frac(5)(16))- 3\frac(6)(16) = (4 + \color(red) (1) + \frac(5)(16))-3\frac(6)(16) = \\\\ &= (4 + \color(red) (\frac(16)(16)) + \frac(5)(16))-3\frac(6)(16) = (4 + \color(red) (\frac(21 )(16)))-3\frac(3)(8) = 4\frac(21)(16)-3\frac(6)(16) = 1\frac(15)(16)\\\\ \end(align)\)
Lesson contentAdding fractions with like denominators
There are two types of addition of fractions:
- Adding fractions with like denominators
- Adding fractions with different denominators
First, let's learn the addition of fractions with like denominators. Everything is simple here. To add fractions with the same denominators, you need to add their numerators and leave the denominator unchanged. For example, let's add the fractions and . Add the numerators and leave the denominator unchanged:
This example can be easily understood if we remember the pizza, which is divided into four parts. If you add pizza to pizza, you get pizza:
Example 2. Add fractions and .
The answer turned out to be an improper fraction. When the end of the task comes, it is customary to get rid of improper fractions. To get rid of an improper fraction, you need to select the whole part of it. In our case, the whole part is easily isolated - two divided by two equals one:
This example can be easily understood if we remember about a pizza that is divided into two parts. If you add more pizza to the pizza, you get one whole pizza:
Example 3. Add fractions and .
Again, we add up the numerators and leave the denominator unchanged:
This example can be easily understood if we remember the pizza, which is divided into three parts. If you add more pizza to the pizza, you get pizza:
Example 4. Find the value of an expression 
This example is solved in exactly the same way as the previous ones. The numerators must be added and the denominator left unchanged:
Let's try to depict our solution using a drawing. If you add pizzas to a pizza and add more pizzas, you get 1 whole pizza and more pizzas.
As you can see, there is nothing complicated about adding fractions with the same denominators. It is enough to understand the following rules:
- To add fractions with the same denominator, you need to add their numerators and leave the denominator unchanged;
Adding fractions with different denominators
Now let's learn how to add fractions with different denominators. When adding fractions, the denominators of the fractions must be the same. But they are not always the same.
For example, fractions can be added because they have same denominators.
But fractions cannot be added right away, since these fractions different denominators. In such cases, fractions must be reduced to the same (common) denominator.
There are several ways to reduce fractions to the same denominator. Today we will look at only one of them, since the other methods may seem complicated for a beginner.
The essence of this method is that first the LCM of the denominators of both fractions is searched. The LCM is then divided by the denominator of the first fraction to obtain the first additional factor. They do the same with the second fraction - the LCM is divided by the denominator of the second fraction and a second additional factor is obtained.
The numerators and denominators of the fractions are then multiplied by their additional factors. As a result of these actions, fractions that had different denominators turn into fractions that have the same denominators. And we already know how to add such fractions.
Example 1. Let's add the fractions and
First of all, we find the least common multiple of the denominators of both fractions. The denominator of the first fraction is the number 3, and the denominator of the second fraction is the number 2. The least common multiple of these numbers is 6
LCM (2 and 3) = 6
Now let's return to fractions and . First, divide the LCM by the denominator of the first fraction and get the first additional factor. LCM is the number 6, and the denominator of the first fraction is the number 3. Divide 6 by 3, we get 2.
The resulting number 2 is the first additional multiplier. We write it down to the first fraction. To do this, make a small oblique line over the fraction and write down the additional factor found above it:
We do the same with the second fraction. We divide the LCM by the denominator of the second fraction and get the second additional factor. LCM is the number 6, and the denominator of the second fraction is the number 2. Divide 6 by 2, we get 3.
The resulting number 3 is the second additional multiplier. We write it down to the second fraction. Again, we make a small oblique line over the second fraction and write down the additional factor found above it:
Now we have everything ready for addition. It remains to multiply the numerators and denominators of the fractions by their additional factors:
Look carefully at what we have come to. We came to the conclusion that fractions that had different denominators turned into fractions that had the same denominators. And we already know how to add such fractions. Let's take this example to the end:
This completes the example. It turns out to add .
Let's try to depict our solution using a drawing. If you add pizza to a pizza, you get one whole pizza and another sixth of a pizza:
Reducing fractions to the same (common) denominator can also be depicted using a picture. Reducing the fractions and to a common denominator, we got the fractions and . These two fractions will be represented by the same pieces of pizza. The only difference will be that this time they will be divided into equal shares (reduced to the same denominator).
The first drawing represents a fraction (four pieces out of six), and the second drawing represents a fraction (three pieces out of six). Adding these pieces we get (seven pieces out of six). This fraction is improper, so we highlighted the whole part of it. As a result, we got (one whole pizza and another sixth pizza).
Please note that we have described this example too detailed. IN educational institutions It’s not customary to write in such detail. You need to be able to quickly find the LCM of both denominators and additional factors to them, as well as quickly multiply the found additional factors by your numerators and denominators. If we were at school, we would have to write this example as follows:
But there is also back side medals. If you do not take detailed notes in the first stages of studying mathematics, then questions of the sort begin to appear. “Where does that number come from?”, “Why do fractions suddenly turn into completely different fractions? «.
To make it easier to add fractions with different denominators, you can use the following step-by-step instructions:
- Find the LCM of the denominators of fractions;
- Divide the LCM by the denominator of each fraction and obtain an additional factor for each fraction;
- Multiply the numerators and denominators of fractions by their additional factors;
- Add fractions that have the same denominators;
- If the answer turns out to be an improper fraction, then select its whole part;
Example 2. Find the value of an expression 
.
Let's use the instructions given above.
Step 1. Find the LCM of the denominators of the fractions
Find the LCM of the denominators of both fractions. The denominators of fractions are the numbers 2, 3 and 4
Step 2. Divide the LCM by the denominator of each fraction and get an additional factor for each fraction
Divide the LCM by the denominator of the first fraction. LCM is the number 12, and the denominator of the first fraction is the number 2. Divide 12 by 2, we get 6. We got the first additional factor 6. We write it above the first fraction:
Now we divide the LCM by the denominator of the second fraction. LCM is the number 12, and the denominator of the second fraction is the number 3. Divide 12 by 3, we get 4. We get the second additional factor 4. We write it above the second fraction:
Now we divide the LCM by the denominator of the third fraction. LCM is the number 12, and the denominator of the third fraction is the number 4. Divide 12 by 4, we get 3. We get the third additional factor 3. We write it above the third fraction:
Step 3. Multiply the numerators and denominators of the fractions by their additional factors
We multiply the numerators and denominators by their additional factors:
Step 4. Add fractions with the same denominators
We came to the conclusion that fractions that had different denominators turned into fractions that had the same (common) denominators. All that remains is to add these fractions. Add it up:
The addition didn't fit on one line, so we moved the remaining expression to the next line. This is allowed in mathematics. When an expression does not fit on one line, it is moved to the next line, and it is necessary to put an equal sign (=) at the end of the first line and at the beginning of the new line. The equal sign on the second line indicates that this is a continuation of the expression that was on the first line.
Step 5. If the answer turns out to be an improper fraction, then select the whole part of it
Our answer turned out to be an improper fraction. We have to highlight a whole part of it. We highlight:
We received an answer
Subtracting fractions with like denominators
There are two types of subtraction of fractions:
- Subtracting fractions with like denominators
- Subtracting fractions with different denominators
First, let's learn how to subtract fractions with like denominators. Everything is simple here. To subtract another from one fraction, you need to subtract the numerator of the second fraction from the numerator of the first fraction, but leave the denominator the same.
For example, let's find the value of the expression . To solve this example, you need to subtract the numerator of the second fraction from the numerator of the first fraction, and leave the denominator unchanged. Let's do this:
This example can be easily understood if we remember the pizza, which is divided into four parts. If you cut pizzas from a pizza, you get pizzas:
Example 2. Find the value of the expression.
Again, from the numerator of the first fraction, subtract the numerator of the second fraction, and leave the denominator unchanged:
This example can be easily understood if we remember the pizza, which is divided into three parts. If you cut pizzas from a pizza, you get pizzas:
Example 3. Find the value of an expression 
This example is solved in exactly the same way as the previous ones. From the numerator of the first fraction you need to subtract the numerators of the remaining fractions:
As you can see, there is nothing complicated about subtracting fractions with the same denominators. It is enough to understand the following rules:
- To subtract another from one fraction, you need to subtract the numerator of the second fraction from the numerator of the first fraction, and leave the denominator unchanged;
- If the answer turns out to be an improper fraction, then you need to highlight the whole part of it.
Subtracting fractions with different denominators
For example, you can subtract a fraction from a fraction because the fractions have the same denominators. But you cannot subtract a fraction from a fraction, since these fractions have different denominators. In such cases, fractions must be reduced to the same (common) denominator.
The common denominator is found using the same principle that we used when adding fractions with different denominators. First of all, find the LCM of the denominators of both fractions. Then the LCM is divided by the denominator of the first fraction and the first additional factor is obtained, which is written above the first fraction. Similarly, the LCM is divided by the denominator of the second fraction and a second additional factor is obtained, which is written above the second fraction.
The fractions are then multiplied by their additional factors. As a result of these operations, fractions that had different denominators are converted into fractions that have the same denominators. And we already know how to subtract such fractions.
Example 1. Find the meaning of the expression:
These fractions have different denominators, so you need to reduce them to the same (common) denominator.
First we find the LCM of the denominators of both fractions. The denominator of the first fraction is the number 3, and the denominator of the second fraction is the number 4. The least common multiple of these numbers is 12
LCM (3 and 4) = 12
Now let's return to fractions and
Let's find an additional factor for the first fraction. To do this, divide the LCM by the denominator of the first fraction. LCM is the number 12, and the denominator of the first fraction is the number 3. Divide 12 by 3, we get 4. Write a four above the first fraction:
We do the same with the second fraction. Divide the LCM by the denominator of the second fraction. LCM is the number 12, and the denominator of the second fraction is the number 4. Divide 12 by 4, we get 3. Write a three over the second fraction:
Now we are ready for subtraction. It remains to multiply the fractions by their additional factors:
We came to the conclusion that fractions that had different denominators turned into fractions that had the same denominators. And we already know how to subtract such fractions. Let's take this example to the end:
We received an answer
Let's try to depict our solution using a drawing. If you cut pizza from a pizza, you get pizza
This detailed version solutions. If we were at school, we would have to solve this example shorter. Such a solution would look like this:
Reducing fractions to a common denominator can also be depicted using a picture. Reducing these fractions to a common denominator, we got the fractions and . These fractions will be represented by the same pizza slices, but this time they will be divided into equal shares (reduced to the same denominator):
The first picture shows a fraction (eight pieces out of twelve), and the second picture shows a fraction (three pieces out of twelve). By cutting three pieces from eight pieces, we get five pieces out of twelve. The fraction describes these five pieces.
Example 2. Find the value of an expression 
These fractions have different denominators, so first you need to reduce them to the same (common) denominator.
Let's find the LCM of the denominators of these fractions.
The denominators of the fractions are the numbers 10, 3 and 5. The least common multiple of these numbers is 30
LCM(10, 3, 5) = 30
Now we find additional factors for each fraction. To do this, divide the LCM by the denominator of each fraction.
Let's find an additional factor for the first fraction. LCM is the number 30, and the denominator of the first fraction is the number 10. Divide 30 by 10, we get the first additional factor 3. We write it above the first fraction:
Now we find an additional factor for the second fraction. Divide the LCM by the denominator of the second fraction. LCM is the number 30, and the denominator of the second fraction is the number 3. Divide 30 by 3, we get the second additional factor 10. We write it above the second fraction:
Now we find an additional factor for the third fraction. Divide the LCM by the denominator of the third fraction. LCM is the number 30, and the denominator of the third fraction is the number 5. Divide 30 by 5, we get the third additional factor 6. We write it above the third fraction:
Now everything is ready for subtraction. It remains to multiply the fractions by their additional factors:
We came to the conclusion that fractions that had different denominators turned into fractions that had the same (common) denominators. And we already know how to subtract such fractions. Let's finish this example.
The continuation of the example will not fit on one line, so we move the continuation to the next line. Don't forget about the equal sign (=) on the new line:
The answer turned out to be a regular fraction, and everything seems to suit us, but it is too cumbersome and ugly. We should make it simpler. What can be done? You can shorten this fraction.
To reduce a fraction, you need to divide its numerator and denominator by (GCD) of the numbers 20 and 30.
So, we find the gcd of numbers 20 and 30:
Now we return to our example and divide the numerator and denominator of the fraction by the found gcd, that is, by 10
We received an answer
Multiplying a fraction by a number
To multiply a fraction by a number, you need to multiply the numerator of the given fraction by that number and leave the denominator the same.
Example 1. Multiply a fraction by the number 1.
Multiply the numerator of the fraction by the number 1
The recording can be understood as taking half 1 time. For example, if you take pizza once, you get pizza
From the laws of multiplication we know that if the multiplicand and the factor are swapped, the product will not change. If the expression is written as , then the product will still be equal to . Again, the rule for multiplying a whole number and a fraction works:
This notation can be understood as taking half of one. For example, if there is 1 whole pizza and we take half of it, then we will have pizza:
Example 2. Find the value of an expression
Multiply the numerator of the fraction by 4
The answer was an improper fraction. Let's highlight the whole part of it:
The expression can be understood as taking two quarters 4 times. For example, if you take 4 pizzas, you will get two whole pizzas
And if we swap the multiplicand and the multiplier, we get the expression . It will also be equal to 2. This expression can be understood as taking two pizzas from four whole pizzas:
Multiplying fractions
To multiply fractions, you need to multiply their numerators and denominators. If the answer turns out to be an improper fraction, you need to highlight the whole part of it.
Example 1. Find the value of the expression.
We received an answer. It is advisable to reduce this fraction. The fraction can be reduced by 2. Then the final solution will take the following form:
The expression can be understood as taking a pizza from half a pizza. Let's say we have half a pizza:
How to take two thirds from this half? First you need to divide this half into three equal parts:
And take two from these three pieces:
We'll make pizza. Remember what pizza looks like when divided into three parts:
One piece of this pizza and the two pieces we took will have the same dimensions:
In other words, we are talking about the same size pizza. Therefore the value of the expression is
Example 2. Find the value of an expression
Multiply the numerator of the first fraction by the numerator of the second fraction, and the denominator of the first fraction by the denominator of the second fraction:
The answer was an improper fraction. Let's highlight the whole part of it:
Example 3. Find the value of an expression
Multiply the numerator of the first fraction by the numerator of the second fraction, and the denominator of the first fraction by the denominator of the second fraction:
The answer turned out to be a regular fraction, but it would be good if it was shortened. To reduce this fraction, you need to divide the numerator and denominator of this fraction by the largest common divisor(GCD) numbers 105 and 450.
So, let’s find the gcd of numbers 105 and 450:
Now we divide the numerator and denominator of our answer by the gcd that we have now found, that is, by 15
Representing a whole number as a fraction
Any whole number can be represented as a fraction. For example, the number 5 can be represented as . This will not change the meaning of five, since the expression means “the number five divided by one,” and this, as we know, is equal to five:
Reciprocal numbers
Now we will get acquainted with very interesting topic in mathematics. It's called "reverse numbers".
Definition. Reverse to numbera is a number that, when multiplied bya gives one.
Let's substitute in this definition instead of the variable a number 5 and try to read the definition:
Reverse to number 5 is a number that, when multiplied by 5 gives one.
Is it possible to find a number that, when multiplied by 5, gives one? It turns out it is possible. Let's imagine five as a fraction:
Then multiply this fraction by itself, just swap the numerator and denominator. In other words, let’s multiply the fraction by itself, only upside down:
What will happen as a result of this? If we continue to solve this example, we get one:
This means that the inverse of the number 5 is the number , since when you multiply 5 by you get one.
The reciprocal of a number can also be found for any other integer.
You can also find the reciprocal of any other fraction. To do this, just turn it over.
Dividing a fraction by a number
Let's say we have half a pizza:
Let's divide it equally between two. How much pizza will each person get?
It can be seen that after dividing half the pizza, two equal pieces were obtained, each of which constitutes a pizza. So everyone gets a pizza.
Division of fractions is done using reciprocals. Reciprocal numbers allow you to replace division with multiplication.
To divide a fraction by a number, you need to multiply the fraction by the inverse of the divisor.
Using this rule, we will write down the division of our half of the pizza into two parts.
So, you need to divide the fraction by the number 2. Here the dividend is the fraction and the divisor is the number 2.
To divide a fraction by the number 2, you need to multiply this fraction by the reciprocal of the divisor 2. The reciprocal of the divisor 2 is the fraction. So you need to multiply by
In the fifth century BC, the ancient Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea formulated his famous aporias, the most famous of which is the “Achilles and the Tortoise” aporia. Here's what it sounds like:Let's say Achilles runs ten times faster than the tortoise and is a thousand steps behind it. During the time it takes Achilles to run this distance, the tortoise will crawl a hundred steps in the same direction. When Achilles runs a hundred steps, the tortoise crawls another ten steps, and so on. The process will continue ad infinitum, Achilles will never catch up with the tortoise.
This reasoning became a logical shock for all subsequent generations. Aristotle, Diogenes, Kant, Hegel, Hilbert... They all considered Zeno's aporia in one way or another. The shock was so strong that " ...discussions continue to this day; the scientific community has not yet been able to come to a common opinion on the essence of paradoxes...were involved in the study of the issue mathematical analysis, set theory, new physical and philosophical approaches; none of them became a generally accepted solution to the problem..."[Wikipedia, "Zeno's Aporia". Everyone understands that they are being fooled, but no one understands what the deception consists of.
From a mathematical point of view, Zeno in his aporia clearly demonstrated the transition from quantity to . This transition implies application instead of permanent ones. As far as I understand, the mathematical apparatus for using variable units of measurement has either not yet been developed, or it has not been applied to Zeno’s aporia. Applying our usual logic leads us into a trap. We, due to the inertia of thinking, apply constant units of time to the reciprocal value. From a physical point of view, this looks like time slowing down until it stops completely at the moment when Achilles catches up with the turtle. If time stops, Achilles can no longer outrun the tortoise.
If we turn our usual logic around, everything falls into place. Achilles runs at a constant speed. Each subsequent segment of his path is ten times shorter than the previous one. Accordingly, the time spent on overcoming it is ten times less than the previous one. If we apply the concept of “infinity” in this situation, then it would be correct to say “Achilles will catch up with the turtle infinitely quickly.”
How to avoid this logical trap? Remain in constant units of time and do not switch to reciprocal units. In Zeno's language it looks like this:
In the time it takes Achilles to run a thousand steps, the tortoise will crawl a hundred steps in the same direction. During the next time interval equal to the first, Achilles will run another thousand steps, and the tortoise will crawl a hundred steps. Now Achilles is eight hundred steps ahead of the tortoise.
This approach adequately describes reality without any logical paradoxes. But this is not a complete solution to the problem. Einstein’s statement about the irresistibility of the speed of light is very similar to Zeno’s aporia “Achilles and the Tortoise”. We still have to study, rethink and solve this problem. And the solution must be sought not in infinitely large numbers, but in units of measurement.
Another interesting aporia of Zeno tells about a flying arrow:
A flying arrow is motionless, since at every moment of time it is at rest, and since it is at rest at every moment of time, it is always at rest.
In this aporia, the logical paradox is overcome very simply - it is enough to clarify that at each moment of time a flying arrow is at rest at different points in space, which, in fact, is motion. Another point needs to be noted here. From one photograph of a car on the road it is impossible to determine either the fact of its movement or the distance to it. To determine whether a car is moving, you need two photographs taken from the same point at different points in time, but you cannot determine the distance from them. To determine the distance to a car, you need two photographs taken from different points in space at one point in time, but from them you cannot determine the fact of movement (of course, you still need additional data for calculations, trigonometry will help you). What I want to point out Special attention, is that two points in time and two points in space are different things that should not be confused, because they provide different opportunities for research.
Wednesday, July 4, 2018
The differences between set and multiset are described very well on Wikipedia. Let's see.
As you can see, “there cannot be two identical elements in a set,” but if there are identical elements in a set, such a set is called a “multiset.” Reasonable beings will never understand such absurd logic. This is the level of talking parrots and trained monkeys, who have no intelligence from the word “completely”. Mathematicians act as ordinary trainers, preaching to us their absurd ideas.
Once upon a time, the engineers who built the bridge were in a boat under the bridge while testing the bridge. If the bridge collapsed, the mediocre engineer died under the rubble of his creation. If the bridge could withstand the load, the talented engineer built other bridges.
No matter how mathematicians hide behind the phrase “mind me, I’m in the house,” or rather, “mathematics studies abstract concepts,” there is one umbilical cord that inextricably connects them with reality. This umbilical cord is money. Let us apply mathematical set theory to mathematicians themselves.
We studied mathematics very well and now we are sitting at the cash register, giving out salaries. So a mathematician comes to us for his money. We count out the entire amount to him and lay it out on our table in different piles, into which we put bills of the same denomination. Then we take one bill from each pile and give the mathematician his “mathematical set of salary.” Let us explain to the mathematician that he will receive the remaining bills only when he proves that a set without identical elements is not equal to a set with identical elements. This is where the fun begins.
First of all, the logic of the deputies will work: “This can be applied to others, but not to me!” Then they will begin to reassure us that bills of the same denomination have different bill numbers, which means they cannot be considered the same elements. Okay, let's count salaries in coins - there are no numbers on the coins. Here the mathematician will begin to frantically remember physics: on different coins there is different quantities dirt, crystal structure and atomic arrangement of each coin is unique...
And now I have the most interest Ask: where is the line beyond which the elements of a multiset turn into elements of a set and vice versa? Such a line does not exist - everything is decided by shamans, science is not even close to lying here.
Look here. We select football stadiums with the same field area. The areas of the fields are the same - which means we have a multiset. But if we look at the names of these same stadiums, we get many, because the names are different. As you can see, the same set of elements is both a set and a multiset. Which is correct? And here the mathematician-shaman-sharpist pulls out an ace of trumps from his sleeve and begins to tell us either about a set or a multiset. In any case, he will convince us that he is right.
To understand how modern shamans operate with set theory, tying it to reality, it is enough to answer one question: how do the elements of one set differ from the elements of another set? I'll show you, without any "conceivable as not a single whole" or "not conceivable as a single whole."
Sunday, March 18, 2018
The sum of the digits of a number is a dance of shamans with a tambourine, which has nothing to do with mathematics. Yes, in mathematics lessons we are taught to find the sum of the digits of a number and use it, but that’s why they are shamans, to teach their descendants their skills and wisdom, otherwise shamans will simply die out.
Do you need proof? Open Wikipedia and try to find the page "Sum of digits of a number." She doesn't exist. There is no formula in mathematics that can be used to find the sum of the digits of any number. After all, numbers are graphic symbols, with the help of which we write numbers and in the language of mathematics the task sounds like this: “Find the sum of graphic symbols representing any number.” Mathematicians cannot solve this problem, but shamans can do it easily.
Let's figure out what and how we do in order to find the sum of the digits of a given number. And so, let us have the number 12345. What needs to be done in order to find the sum of the digits of this number? Let's consider all the steps in order.
1. Write down the number on a piece of paper. What have we done? We have converted the number into a graphical number symbol. This is not a mathematical operation.
2. We cut one resulting picture into several pictures containing individual numbers. Cutting a picture is not a mathematical operation.
3. Convert individual graphic symbols into numbers. This is not a mathematical operation.
4. Add the resulting numbers. Now this is mathematics.
The sum of the digits of the number 12345 is 15. These are the “cutting and sewing courses” taught by shamans that mathematicians use. But that is not all.
From a mathematical point of view, it does not matter in which number system we write a number. So, in different systems In calculus, the sum of the digits of the same number will be different. In mathematics, the number system is indicated as a subscript to the right of the number. With the large number 12345, I don’t want to fool my head, let’s consider the number 26 from the article about. Let's write this number in binary, octal, decimal and hexadecimal number systems. We won't look at every step under a microscope; we've already done that. Let's look at the result.
As you can see, in different number systems the sum of the digits of the same number is different. This result has nothing to do with mathematics. It’s the same as if you determined the area of a rectangle in meters and centimeters, you would get completely different results.
Zero looks the same in all number systems and has no sum of digits. This is another argument in favor of the fact that. Question for mathematicians: how is something that is not a number designated in mathematics? What, for mathematicians nothing exists except numbers? I can allow this for shamans, but not for scientists. Reality is not just about numbers.
The result obtained should be considered as proof that number systems are units of measurement for numbers. After all, we cannot compare numbers with different units of measurement. If the same actions with different units of measurement of the same quantity lead to different results after comparing them, then this has nothing to do with mathematics.
What is real mathematics? This is when the result of a mathematical operation does not depend on the size of the number, the unit of measurement used and on who performs this action.
Oh! Isn't this the women's restroom?
- Young woman! This is a laboratory for the study of the indephilic holiness of souls during their ascension to heaven! Halo on top and arrow up. What other toilet?
Female... The halo on top and the arrow down are male.
If such a work of design art flashes before your eyes several times a day,
Then it’s not surprising that you suddenly find a strange icon in your car:
Personally, I make an effort to see minus four degrees in a pooping person (one picture) (a composition of several pictures: a minus sign, the number four, a designation of degrees). And I don’t think this girl is a fool who doesn’t know physics. She just has a strong stereotype of perceiving graphic images. And mathematicians teach us this all the time. Here's an example.
1A is not “minus four degrees” or “one a”. This is "pooping man" or the number "twenty-six" in hexadecimal notation. Those people who constantly work in this number system automatically perceive a number and a letter as one graphic symbol.
Fractions are ordinary numbers and can also be added and subtracted. But due to the fact that they contain a denominator, more complex rules than for integers.
Let's consider the simplest case, when there are two fractions with the same denominators. Then:
To add fractions with the same denominators, you need to add their numerators and leave the denominator unchanged.
To subtract fractions with the same denominators, you need to subtract the numerator of the second from the numerator of the first fraction, and again leave the denominator unchanged.
Within each expression, the denominators of the fractions are equal. By definition of adding and subtracting fractions we get:
As you can see, it’s nothing complicated: we just add or subtract the numerators and that’s it.
But even in such simple actions, people manage to make mistakes. What is most often forgotten is that the denominator does not change. For example, when adding them, they also begin to add up, and this is fundamentally wrong.
Getting rid of the bad habit of adding denominators is quite simple. Try the same thing when subtracting. As a result, the denominator will be zero, and the fraction will (suddenly!) lose its meaning.
Therefore, remember once and for all: when adding and subtracting, the denominator does not change!
Many people also make mistakes when adding several negative fractions. There is confusion with the signs: where to put a minus and where to put a plus.
This problem is also very easy to solve. It is enough to remember that the minus before the sign of a fraction can always be transferred to the numerator - and vice versa. And of course, don’t forget two simple rules:
- Plus by minus gives minus;
- Two negatives make an affirmative.
Let's look at all this with specific examples:
Task. Find the meaning of the expression:
In the first case, everything is simple, but in the second, let’s add minuses to the numerators of the fractions:
What to do if the denominators are different
You cannot add fractions with different denominators directly. At least, this method is unknown to me. However, the original fractions can always be rewritten so that the denominators become the same.
There are many ways to convert fractions. Three of them are discussed in the lesson “Reducing fractions to a common denominator”, so we will not dwell on them here. Let's look at some examples:
Task. Find the meaning of the expression:
In the first case, we reduce the fractions to a common denominator using the “criss-cross” method. In the second we will look for the NOC. Note that 6 = 2 · 3; 9 = 3 · 3. The last factors in these expansions are equal, and the first ones are relatively prime. Therefore, LCM(6, 9) = 2 3 3 = 18.
What to do if a fraction has an integer part
I can please you: different denominators in fractions are not the biggest evil. Much more errors occur when the whole part is highlighted in the addend fractions.
Of course, for such fractions there are proprietary algorithms addition and subtraction, but they are quite complex and require a lot of learning. Better use simple diagram, given below:
- Convert all fractions containing an integer part to improper ones. We obtain normal terms (even with different denominators), which are calculated according to the rules discussed above;
- Actually, calculate the sum or difference of the resulting fractions. As a result, we will practically find the answer;
- If this is all that was required in the task, we perform inverse conversion, i.e. We get rid of an improper fraction by highlighting the whole part.
The rules for moving to improper fractions and highlighting the whole part are described in detail in the lesson “What is a numerical fraction”. If you don’t remember, be sure to repeat it. Examples:
Task. Find the meaning of the expression:
Everything is simple here. The denominators inside each expression are equal, so all that remains is to convert all fractions to improper ones and count. We have:
To simplify the calculations, I have skipped some obvious steps in the last examples.
A small note about two latest examples, where fractions with the integer part highlighted are subtracted. The minus before the second fraction means that the entire fraction is subtracted, and not just its whole part.
Re-read this sentence again, look at the examples - and think about it. This is where beginners make a huge number of mistakes. They love to give such tasks to tests. You will also encounter them several times in the tests for this lesson, which will be published shortly.
Summary: general calculation scheme
In conclusion, I will give a general algorithm that will help you find the sum or difference of two or more fractions:
- If one or more fractions have an integer part, convert these fractions to improper ones;
- Bring all the fractions to a common denominator in any way convenient for you (unless, of course, the writers of the problems did this);
- Add or subtract the resulting numbers according to the rules for adding and subtracting fractions with like denominators;
- If possible, shorten the result. If the fraction is incorrect, select the whole part.
Remember that it is better to highlight the whole part at the very end of the task, immediately before writing down the answer.
You can perform various operations with fractions, for example, adding fractions. Addition of fractions can be divided into several types. Each type of addition of fractions has its own rules and algorithm of actions. Let's look at each type of addition in detail.
Adding fractions with like denominators.
Let's look at an example of how to add fractions with a common denominator.
The tourists went on a hike from point A to point E. On the first day they walked from point A to B or \(\frac(1)(5)\) of the entire path. On the second day they walked from point B to D or \(\frac(2)(5)\) the whole way. How far did they travel from the beginning of the journey to point D?
To find the distance from point A to point D, you need to add the fractions \(\frac(1)(5) + \frac(2)(5)\).
Adding fractions with like denominators means that you need to add the numerators of these fractions, but the denominator will remain the same.
\(\frac(1)(5) + \frac(2)(5) = \frac(1 + 2)(5) = \frac(3)(5)\)
In literal form, the sum of fractions with the same denominators will look like this:
\(\bf \frac(a)(c) + \frac(b)(c) = \frac(a + b)(c)\)
Answer: the tourists walked \(\frac(3)(5)\) the entire way.
Adding fractions with different denominators.
Let's look at an example:
You need to add two fractions \(\frac(3)(4)\) and \(\frac(2)(7)\).
To add fractions with different denominators, you must first find, and then use the rule for adding fractions with like denominators.
For denominators 4 and 7, the common denominator will be the number 28. The first fraction \(\frac(3)(4)\) must be multiplied by 7. The second fraction \(\frac(2)(7)\) must be multiplied by 4.
\(\frac(3)(4) + \frac(2)(7) = \frac(3 \times \color(red) (7) + 2 \times \color(red) (4))(4 \ times \color(red) (7)) = \frac(21 + 8)(28) = \frac(29)(28) = 1\frac(1)(28)\)
In literal form we get the following formula:
\(\bf \frac(a)(b) + \frac(c)(d) = \frac(a \times d + c \times b)(b \times d)\)
Adding mixed numbers or mixed fractions.
Addition occurs according to the law of addition.
For mixed fractions, we add the whole parts with the whole parts and the fractional parts with the fractions.
If fractional parts mixed numbers have the same denominators, then we add the numerators, but the denominator remains the same.
Let's add the mixed numbers \(3\frac(6)(11)\) and \(1\frac(3)(11)\).
\(3\frac(6)(11) + 1\frac(3)(11) = (\color(red) (3) + \color(blue) (\frac(6)(11))) + ( \color(red) (1) + \color(blue) (\frac(3)(11))) = (\color(red) (3) + \color(red) (1)) + (\color( blue) (\frac(6)(11)) + \color(blue) (\frac(3)(11))) = \color(red)(4) + (\color(blue) (\frac(6 + 3)(11))) = \color(red)(4) + \color(blue) (\frac(9)(11)) = \color(red)(4) \color(blue) (\frac (9)(11))\)
If the fractional parts of mixed numbers have different denominators, then we find the common denominator.
Let's perform the addition of mixed numbers \(7\frac(1)(8)\) and \(2\frac(1)(6)\).
The denominator is different, so we need to find the common denominator, it is equal to 24. Multiply the first fraction \(7\frac(1)(8)\) by an additional factor of 3, and the second fraction \(2\frac(1)(6)\) by 4.
\(7\frac(1)(8) + 2\frac(1)(6) = 7\frac(1 \times \color(red) (3))(8 \times \color(red) (3) ) = 2\frac(1\times \color(red) (4))(6\times \color(red) (4)) =7\frac(3)(24) + 2\frac(4)(24 ) = 9\frac(7)(24)\)
Related questions:
How to add fractions?
Answer: first you need to decide what type of expression it is: fractions have the same denominators, different denominators or mixed fractions. Depending on the type of expression, we proceed to the solution algorithm.
How to solve fractions with different denominators?
Answer: you need to find the common denominator, and then follow the rule of adding fractions with the same denominators.
How to solve mixed fractions?
Answer: we add integer parts with integers and fractional parts with fractions.
Example #1:
Can the sum of two result in a proper fraction? Improper fraction? Give examples.
\(\frac(2)(7) + \frac(3)(7) = \frac(2 + 3)(7) = \frac(5)(7)\)
The fraction \(\frac(5)(7)\) is a proper fraction, it is the result of the sum of two proper fractions \(\frac(2)(7)\) and \(\frac(3)(7)\).
\(\frac(2)(5) + \frac(8)(9) = \frac(2 \times 9 + 8 \times 5)(5 \times 9) =\frac(18 + 40)(45) = \frac(58)(45)\)
The fraction \(\frac(58)(45)\) is an improper fraction, it is the result of the sum of the proper fractions \(\frac(2)(5)\) and \(\frac(8)(9)\).
Answer: The answer to both questions is yes.
Example #2:
Add the fractions: a) \(\frac(3)(11) + \frac(5)(11)\) b) \(\frac(1)(3) + \frac(2)(9)\).
a) \(\frac(3)(11) + \frac(5)(11) = \frac(3 + 5)(11) = \frac(8)(11)\)
b) \(\frac(1)(3) + \frac(2)(9) = \frac(1 \times \color(red) (3))(3 \times \color(red) (3)) + \frac(2)(9) = \frac(3)(9) + \frac(2)(9) = \frac(5)(9)\)
Example #3:
Write it down mixed fraction as a sum natural number and proper fraction: a) \(1\frac(9)(47)\) b) \(5\frac(1)(3)\)
a) \(1\frac(9)(47) = 1 + \frac(9)(47)\)
b) \(5\frac(1)(3) = 5 + \frac(1)(3)\)
Example #4:
Calculate the sum: a) \(8\frac(5)(7) + 2\frac(1)(7)\) b) \(2\frac(9)(13) + \frac(2)(13) \) c) \(7\frac(2)(5) + 3\frac(4)(15)\)
a) \(8\frac(5)(7) + 2\frac(1)(7) = (8 + 2) + (\frac(5)(7) + \frac(1)(7)) = 10 + \frac(6)(7) = 10\frac(6)(7)\)
b) \(2\frac(9)(13) + \frac(2)(13) = 2 + (\frac(9)(13) + \frac(2)(13)) = 2\frac(11 )(13) \)
c) \(7\frac(2)(5) + 3\frac(4)(15) = 7\frac(2\times 3)(5\times 3) + 3\frac(4)(15) = 7\frac(6)(15) + 3\frac(4)(15) = (7 + 3)+(\frac(6)(15) + \frac(4)(15)) = 10 + \frac (10)(15) = 10\frac(10)(15) = 10\frac(2)(3)\)
Task #1:
At lunch we ate \(\frac(8)(11)\) from the cake, and in the evening at dinner we ate \(\frac(3)(11)\). Do you think the cake was completely eaten or not?
Solution:
The denominator of the fraction is 11, it indicates how many parts the cake was divided into. At lunch we ate 8 pieces of cake out of 11. At dinner we ate 3 pieces of cake out of 11. Let’s add 8 + 3 = 11, we ate pieces of cake out of 11, that is, the whole cake.
\(\frac(8)(11) + \frac(3)(11) = \frac(11)(11) = 1\)
Answer: the whole cake was eaten.