Organization of public administration in the field of culture.

Communications that contribute to the formation of culture are combined within the framework of organizational socialization, i.e. continuous transmission key elements the culture of the body to its employees, which includes both official channels (for example, introducing new employees to the core values of the organization) and informal ones (for example, modeling behavior by mentors. It should be noted that socialization contributes to the formation of a sense of security among managers and subordinates.

The process, which is the reverse of socialization (active actions of organ employees aimed at changing its culture), is called individualization. The relationship between socialization and individualization and the presence among workers of various types, who have different attitudes towards the norms of the culture that actually exists in the body, significantly influence the processes of formation of a new culture.

Socialization is the influence of organizational culture on the employee, his acceptance of norms. Individualization - the employee’s influence on organizational culture, deviations of his behavior from the norm.

An obligatory element of the general culture of the state management activities is legal culture, since the main source of this activity is law. Its essence, goals, and mechanism of implementation are determined by the social nature of public administration as a form of implementation of state power. And every government requires legitimation, the establishment of an appropriate legal order. First of all, this is associated with the activities of managing the affairs of society and the state, in which the foundations of power are laid. Law here acts not only as a source, but also as a political and legal limit for the freedom of choice of managerial actions, which in their forms must correspond to the value-based legal categories of a given society.

Civil service culture is the level of government development of the management system, in which the professionalism, competence, and moral principles of civil servants must embody this level and create conditions for its effective influence on the real lives of citizens. Civil servants are a special socio-professional group responsible for governance in the state, implementing regulatory norms to strengthen order in society. This group includes representatives of various professions with their inherent professional skills, mentality and culture.

The culture of public service bears a special burden in those elements of the state management system that have a legally secured opportunity to have a decisive influence on the life of society. Therefore, the culture of public administration of senior government officials has a two-sided content. It is aimed, firstly, at organizing public life, and secondly, at establishing professionally perfect and state-mature activities of the government “apparatuses” of management, those direct state management structures that they manage, although in relation to them these “apparatuses” have significantly different possibilities.

If culture, as defined by the German philosopher E. Kant (more than 400 definitions of the concept “culture”), expresses a person’s ability to set a goal, then work culture is an indispensable condition for the successful implementation of a goal. Purpose administrative reform, as is known, is the creation of an effective system of public administration, which will ensure the establishment of a highly developed rule-of-law state with high level life. Reforming the civil service as a cultural institution is an important condition for increasing the efficiency of the functioning of the civil service and the level of professional culture civil servant, an indispensable condition for the successful implementation of state building.

The emergence of new technologies has changed the concept of professionalism.

Professionalism is a deep and comprehensive knowledge and possession of practical skills in a certain area of socially useful activity. It should be said that professionalism is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for professional culture.

The culture of a specialist develops through practical experience, but the intellectual means of professionalism are formed by education, the main goal of which is to achieve professional excellence. This concept includes: firstly, a broad information horizon in the chosen specialty, secondly, an analytical mindset, and thirdly, knowledge of the general laws and properties of natural materials.

The complexity and depth of the tasks of the civil service require an integrated approach to the study of the problem of work culture of civil servants, which requires philosophical, social, economic analysis and includes political, legal, moral, ethical, aesthetic, organizational and other aspects. Information culture can be defined as a set of value-normative regulators of the activities and behavior of people in a given field of work. In information culture, we can roughly distinguish several main facets: the cultural state of the production environment, the culture of using tools, the culture business communication, culture of professional thinking.

Information culture should occupy a special place in society. Without information, it is impossible to obtain a clear picture, a scientific understanding of the real processes and facts of social life, all its components. It must be emphasized that the effectiveness of information is determined by its efficiency, timeliness, regularity of receipt, sufficiency and objectivity. It is a skillfully done analysis and selected facts that make it possible to draw the right conclusions.

Management information as a specific form of social information is designed to serve the activities of government bodies and other institutions that take part in the management of society, various spheres, and directions of its life. Each branch of government and the social management system uses both internal and external channels of information in its work.

Civil servants need information of different content and form: current and retrospective; sectoral (specialized) and intersectoral (non-specialized, related); factual and conceptual.

The higher the status of a civil servant, the more pronounced the characteristics of his information needs are. Three categories of civil servants can be distinguished: 1) those responsible for strategic decisions (heads of public authorities); 2) those responsible for making tactical decisions (heads of departments, departments); 3) responsible for making operational decisions (low-level managers.

Today in the world the main right of every person is the right to freedom and choice, the right to reveal personal capabilities and ensure their best implementation in the area of their social interests. People must understand and feel the extent of their responsibility to the future. A new worldview is now just beginning to take shape.

Advanced countries have long embarked on the path of building an information society, in which the priority is not the production of products and energy, but the creation of new information technologies. Today from normal operation infrastructure, the existence of a modern state directly depends on the intensity of information exchanges, completeness, timeliness and reliability of information that circulates in computer and telecommunication systems.

Introduction

Culture is a multi-valued social phenomenon that relates to the sphere of spiritual life of the country. Cultural values represent the wealth and dignity of the state.

The cultural traditions laid down by our ancestors are an integral part of the country’s prestige on the world stage. It is not without reason that when inviting an international delegation, the host party strives to show the most striking features of traditional culture, thereby attracting and winning over diplomatic guests.

Culture as a complex social phenomenon is a value-normative mechanism of social interactions, which considers its most important task to ensure the integrity of society and social order. Consequently, culture can be called a mirror of society, which reflects the development and characteristics of an entire nation.

In support of the above, one can cite the formulation of the concept of “culture”, set out in Article 2 of the Draft Federal Law “On Culture in Russian Federation": "culture is a set of characteristics inherent in a society or social group distinctive features, values, traditions and beliefs, expressed in lifestyle and art.”

RelevanceThis topic is that Russia is a social state and culture, being an important component in the social aspect of the country’s growth and development, requires a special state policy aimed at creating conditions that ensure a decent life and development of a citizen in society.

Understanding the importance of cultural development, the state faces main question how to carry out the management process in the social and cultural sphere in such a way as to ensure communicative accuracy and protection of information about the cultural life of the country.

Assessing the state and degree of development of the research topic, it should be noted that a large number of scientists have addressed management issues in the field of culture, as a result of which the literature on the issue under study is quite extensively presented.

Targetgiven course work is the study and analysis of the organization of public administration in the field of culture.

In accordance with the goal, a number of tasks were identified.

)determine the essence of the cultural sphere

)analyze the development of the cultural sphere

)identify the specifics of state cultural management

)characterize the organization of state cultural management

Objectresearch is the public administration system.

Subjectresearch is the organization of management in the field of culture and art.

1. The cultural sphere as an object of management and social development

1.1 The essence of the cultural sphere

All industries social sphere, including culture, acquire great value in the development of social production, influencing the improvement and quality of life of citizens.

Considering the essence of the cultural sphere, first of all, it is necessary to analyze the concept of “culture”.

The term "culture" originally arose in Roman culture as agrarian skill as the cultivation and cultivation of land. The most common thing for modern society is cultivation and cultivation as upbringing and education. Thus, the essence of culture moves into a new direction as an instrument for the harmonious development of personality, the search for ways to acquire one’s human appearance.

Analyzing the sources of domestic humanitarian knowledge, it can be noted that for quite a long time there was no consideration given to another meaning of culture, the sacred. Culture as a cult, veneration, primarily of a religious nature, was an integral part of ancient civilizations. Worship of the gods and adherence to certain customs were considered the highest value of the worldview of that era. IN ancient world the term "paideia" (ancient Greek. Παιδεία - education, formation of a child, education, culture) embodies the unity of multiple meanings of cultures. The concept, which arose in the philosophy of the Sophists in 5 BC, became the subject of analysis by Isocrates and Xenophon and was developed by Plato in the dialogues “The Republic” and “The Laws”. The essence of paideia according to Plato is that the doctrine of the immortality of the soul is inseparable from political program worthy education of a citizen, which is the foundation government structure. Thus, paideia becomes not only the meaning of politics, but also the meaning of the life of the citizen’s soul, which comes down to good upbringing, education, and therefore culture. Aristotle continued the development of the concept in his treatise “Politics”: according to his teaching, the unification of people in single state is possible only through its upbringing, that is, through the introduction of certain morals, philosophy, and laws. It was paideia education that Aristotle considered an important condition for happiness for every member of society. Summarizing the analysis of this period, we can say that ancient man, comparing himself with other peoples, was proud of his mind, feelings and ability to live not only according to natural physiological laws, but also according to established moral standards. Despite the unstable political situation, when the foundations of citizenship give way to chaos, the culture has developed a purely ataraxic character, thereby preserving its inner peace.

Monotheistic cultures, such as Christianity and Islam, develop, according to the principle of ataraxia, the ideals of the individual immersed in his inner world, which is now declared to be derived from God. The theological concept says that even the weakest person becomes strong if he believes in one God, thereby becoming an absolute person. Ideological trends introduced the foundations of personalism into the cultural sphere. Now culture as cultivation presupposes the development of something greater in man, created by the Divine Power. Accordingly, culture is the education of the spiritual inexhaustibility of the individual.

The modern concept of “culture” sees its origins in the philosophy of the European Enlightenment, when interest in the material, material beginning of culture manifested itself. It is then that we can talk about the emergence of an entire cultural sphere as a subsystem of society. The postulate of I. Kant’s philosophy is formed on the idea of separating the world of nature and the world of freedom, human world culture. A moral, and therefore cultural, person becomes a free person, he has the opportunity to determine the only correct life path. For the first time, the highest material manifestation of culture is determined in the form of art. This is associated with all-round development and growth. various types arts, whose products today constitute a rich cultural heritage European countries and Russia.

Today, the concept of “culture” refers to such a set of sectors of the national economy as the social sphere. Social sectors are gaining great importance in modern world. And culture has a direct impact on the state of the spiritual potential of society. The development of culture as a branch of the national economy is characterized by such indicators as the number of professional theaters, circuses, museums, club-cultural institutions, the number of public libraries, and large-scale competitive projects.

The cultural sphere does not have certain cruel time or spatial boundaries. Its existence occurs entirely in collaboration with other spheres of society: material, production, political. Close family ties with the social sphere determine the main direction of the activity of culture as a holistic implementation, the result of which is a person.

Despite the friendly dependence of all spheres of society, the most significant changes in culture cannot always be explained by social and other reasons. For example, when considering cultural scientific works, it has still not been possible to clearly argue for the fact that culture did not stop developing even in the most critical periods of the era. It continued its development under the conditions of a slave society, as well as during the years of totalitarian regimes and dictatorships.

Culture as a product of social life and practice has a huge impact on people. People not only create cultural objects, but also acquire knowledge, thus studying and mastering their culture.

The cultural sphere is an original, ordered unity in its essence. The processes of functioning and development of the cultural sphere are largely determined by objective laws and are based on certain principles of culture and art management. The human factor is undoubtedly a component of the cultural sphere. At the same time, the state of health of the population, its intellectual potential, the accumulation of its personal moral values will be an assessment of the functioning of the sphere, and the place of a person in the structure of culture will be an indicator of the potential possibilities of its social reproduction.

Along with the creative aspect, the cultural sphere also considers aspects of cultural assimilation. Thus, it becomes clear that the wider the scale of created cultural values, the greater becomes the volume of activity necessary for its development and inheritance, transmission to generations.

Society forms and regulates the forms and methods of transmitting cultural values. In the course of history, not only the mastery of already acquired knowledge occurs, but also the further development, improvement and protection of the products of cultural activity.

The fundamental subject of culture is the individual, who reveals in himself all its manifestations. Man, of course, creates his own culture, but the formation of personality is the result of the cultural evolutionary stages of society. Thus, it turns out that culture creates a person under the “supervision” of society. The emotional behavior of an individual is formed in the process of his inculturation, that is, with involvement in the activities of the cultural sphere.

1.2 Development of the cultural sphere

An analysis of modern scientific research in the field of the country's development shows that the growing market relations in the Russian Federation, as well as in all countries with transit economies, require increased government participation in the development of the social sphere, of which culture is a part.

In the Concept of long-term socio-economic development of the Russian Federation for the period until 2020, a special role in the conditions of a qualitative transition on the path of innovation is assigned to effective cultural policy aimed at preserving the nation, and mainly its cultural heritage. Also, the culture of the country, according to the Development Concept of the Russian Federation, is a determining factor in the growth of human potential.

The designated strategic paradigm of cultural policy assumes that a single nation can gain socio-economic strength exclusively by integrating the country's population on the basis of Russian culture through accessibility to cultural values for all subjects of the cultural sphere.

Tracing the development of the cultural sphere of the Russian Federation, it is worth mentioning some key issues outlined in other official documents. The Concept of the Federal Target Program, called “Culture of Russia (2012-2016),” emphasizes that, while implementing the tasks of the previous target program, it was not possible to raise culture to the expected level, to achieve an expansion of the forms and scope of participation of state authorities and society in supporting the cultural sphere.

Assessing the development of the cultural sphere in Russia, it is worth noting its certain decline over the recent period as a participant in market relations. This is due to a number of reasons. Firstly, this is ineffective spending of budget funds intended for the development of the cultural sphere. Secondly, the lack of identification of main priority areas. The development of the cultural sphere is also largely influenced by the existing imperfections of the regulatory framework in the field of public partnership, patronage and charity for culture.

Currently, when the country has entered into the implementation of a new economic model, the development of cultural industries is characterized, first of all, by the transition from the traditional sphere of culture to the so-called cultural industry. Undoubtedly, such a process is dictated by a change in lifestyle due to innovative technologies, a sharp increase in intangible goods in the consumption structure, which are, for example, media consumption.

Considering culture as a sphere of consumption in direct dependence on the economy, it should be noted that for the period 2002-2009. the number of theaters, libraries and museums, as well as cultural and leisure institutions has not decreased from the volume of gross product, therefore, it is inadmissible to conclude that there is a statistical dependence on economic condition countries. On the contrary, it turns out that the crisis of 2008-2009. practically did not play a certain negative role in the dynamics of the number of cultural and art institutions, as well as in the activity of their attendance, with the only exception being cinemas. Thus, it turns out that the dynamics of the number of cultural institutions, and, accordingly, the development of the cultural sphere in Russia is determined by other reasons, independent of the growth of the economic factor. First of all, it is necessary to pay attention to the volume of government investment in the development of culture and art.

It is worth starting to trace the development of culture and the possibility of further improvement in the management of the cultural sphere with a fairly extensive period from 1980-2009. Analysis of this period shows that the decrease total number institutions and the percentage of attendance affected only recreational institutions and libraries. According to statistics in Russia for the period from 1990-2009. the total number of various types of libraries decreased by 24.7%, and the number of registered users - by 27%.

In the course of government reforms relating to culture and art carried out over the years, it is worth noting the increase in the number of professional theaters and the expansion museum complex Russian Federation. It is also gratifying to say that the number of registered museums is constantly increasing and maintaining a certain pace. Thus, over three years, from 2005 to 2009, the number of museums increased by 10%, which is expressed in 254 new units. First of all, the increase in number affected local history museums, which, as of 2009, make up the majority of the museum complex in Russia. According to Rosstat, the leader in museum attendance is the North-Western and Central federal districts. But, despite the positive dynamics and growth of indicators and the efforts of the authorities, the general condition of cultural institutions and, accordingly, the cultural sphere remains quite difficult.

Peculiarities modern development The cultural sphere can be briefly characterized, firstly, by a change in the system of budget financing and an expansion of the scope of application of various federal target programs aimed at improving the cultural sector. Secondly, the presence of developed competition in creative and especially entertainment industries, such as theater, circus, and musical art, has become primarily new for the cultural sphere.

It should also be said that there is an uneven development of the cultural sphere throughout the country due to the colossally different socio-economic development of the regions. It is this fact that does not make it possible for organizations and cultural institutions to attract unused funds from large investors. financial resources entities that represent small and medium business every subject of the country. Contractual procedures with private individuals interested in sponsorship are also complex.

The combination of all the above factors leads to a possible sharp drop in the competitiveness of individual cultural sectors, to the ineffective distribution of state budget funds, and to a drop in the quality of goods on the cultural and art market.

Drawing a conclusion, we can say that currently the cultural sphere is less than other spheres included in the key priorities of state social policy, which leads to a reduction in budget investments in the development of production in the sphere of culture and art. Today, public investments are aimed only at ensuring the basic and current activities of the cultural sphere necessary to maintain cultural heritage. In this case, it is difficult to talk about the full development of the cultural sphere. Government guarantees, which provide not only obligation, but also special property security, will be safer and more profitable for investors today. The innovative course of Russia's development in the field of culture and leisure remains in the future.

In this case, issues such as methodological support for the interaction of cultural and artistic sectors with the economic and political life of countries, both in general and in individual constituent entities of the Russian Federation, begin to acquire growing importance. Important role, undoubtedly, the national cultural policy of the state plays a role, which would put culture on the path of a prestigious branch of the socio-cultural sphere. Undoubtedly, the development of citizens’ interest in cultural sectors will be much higher if the state can develop necessary support, provide the opportunity to take the path of innovation and unification with other sectors of the national economy.

2. Organization of public administration in the field of culture

.1 Structure of governing bodies in the field of culture

cultural department government

Management in the field of culture is carried out by the Government, the system of federal and other executive authorities. The government provides state support for culture and the preservation of cultural heritage of national significance and the peoples of the Russian Federation.

Competence in certain areas of cultural management is exercised by such federal executive bodies as the Ministry of Culture, the Ministry of Press, Television and Mass Communications, the State Committee for Cinematography, and the Federal Archive Service. A certain number of management issues are resolved by unions of journalists, filmmakers, artists and other creative unions operating in accordance with their charters.

The corresponding executive authorities are created in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. They are in charge of most cultural objects. In order to implement the Presidential Decree of December 11, 1997 “On measures to improve public finances,” dozens of cultural objects of federal subordination were transferred to the jurisdiction of the subjects of the Federation.

Also, the objects of management are various cultural institutions: libraries, houses and palaces of culture, clubs, cinemas, circuses, museums.

The Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, according to the Government Regulations dated June 6, 1997, is a federal executive body pursuing state policy in the field of culture, art, protection and use of historical and cultural heritage. Also within the competence of the Ministry of Culture is the implementation government regulation and coordination of the activities of other federal executive authorities in this area in cases established by federal laws, decrees of the President and decrees of the Government.

The Ministry is a specially authorized state body for the protection of historical and cultural monuments, as well as a specially authorized body of state control over compliance with the established procedure for the export and import into Russia of cultural property, the sale of antiques, as well as the rules of foreign economic activity in relation to cultural property. The Russian Ministry of Culture has territorial bodies for the preservation of cultural property.

It exercises its competence mainly in relation to cultural objects of federal significance, the organizational and legal status of which is determined by the Government of the Russian Federation. An example would be the Russian State Library or the State Historical and Cultural Museum-Reserve "Moscow Kremlin".

The main tasks of the Ministry of Culture are:

implementation in the field of culture public policy which provides the necessary conditions to realize the constitutional rights of citizens of the Russian Federation to freedom of creativity, participation in cultural life and use of cultural institutions.

promoting the development of national cultures of the peoples of Russia.

determination of goals and priorities in the development of certain types of cultural activities, professional arts, museums and libraries, folk art, education and science in the field of culture

development and implementation, in accordance with the international obligations of the Russian Federation, of systems of measures to prevent the illegal export and import of cultural property and the transfer of ownership of cultural property.

exercising state control over the export of cultural property from Russia, compliance with the established procedure for the sale of antiques

management of the activities of subordinate organizations.

The main regulatory and legal sources in cultural management are Federal laws, Decrees of the Government of the Russian Federation, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation. For example, the legal basis for the preservation and development of librarianship is the Federal Law of December 29, 1994, which establishes the basic principles of the activities of libraries and guarantees the rights of individuals and public associations to free access to information, familiarization with the values of national world culture and to cultural, scientific and educational activities.

The Federal Law of May 26, 1996 defines the specifics of the situation of museums, of which there are more than 2.5 thousand in the country. They are created in the form of institutions that carry out cultural, educational and scientific functions of a non-profit nature. The Government Decree of February 12, 1998 “On approval of regulations on the Museum Fund of the Russian Federation, on the State Catalog of the Museum Fund of the Russian Federation, on licensing the activities of museums in the Russian Federation” established the procedure and mechanism for accounting and preserving wealth held by museums.

State regulation in the field of archival affairs and control over the preservation, acquisition and use of the Archival Fund of the Russian Federation is carried out by the Federal Archive Service of Russia (Rosarkhiv), in accordance with the Regulations on it, approved by Government Decree of December 28, 1998.

The Rosarkhiv system includes federal state archives, scientific and other directly subordinate organizations, as well as archival management bodies of the constituent entities of the Federation and institutions subordinate to them.

The list of departments responsible for the development of the cultural industry includes the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Press (Roskompechat), the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Cinematography (Goskino of Russia), the Federal Service of Russia for Television and Radio Broadcasting (FSTR) and others.

Thus, the structure of government authorities in the field of culture represents a clearly structured hierarchy of departments that clearly delimit their competence. From the analysis of these departments, it follows that all components of the cultural industry are under the jurisdiction of special services and committees, which are regulated by the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. There are also certain specialized federal services, providing management of certain cultural sectors.

.2 Main directions of state policy in the field of culture

The most important areas of cultural activity are defined in the adopted Federal law dated October 9, 1992 No. 3612 - I “Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on culture”:

identification, study, protection, restoration and use of historical and cultural monuments;

fiction, cinematography, stage, plastic, musical art;

architecture and design, other types and genres of art; artistic folk arts and crafts, folk culture in such manifestations as languages, dialects and dialects, folklore, customs and rituals, historical toponyms;

amateur (amateur) artistic creativity, museology and collecting;

book publishing and librarianship; archival work; TV; radio and other audiovisual media in terms of the creation and dissemination of cultural values;

aesthetic education, art education, pedagogical activities in this area.

Article 1 of the Federal Law of October 9, 1992 “Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on culture” also outlines the priority tasks of the state in the cultural sphere:

ensuring and protecting the constitutional right of citizens of the Russian Federation to cultural activities;

creation of legal guarantees for the free cultural activities of associations of citizens, peoples and other ethnic communities of the Russian Federation;

determination of principles and legal norms of relations between subjects of cultural activity;

determination of the principles of state cultural policy, legal norms of state support for culture and guarantees of state non-interference in creative processes.

Analyzing the tasks outlined in the 90s, it is necessary to note the fact that culture is considered by the state as an independent industry that has no connection, for example, with the economy and politics of the country. From the list of tasks it is clear that state policy in the cultural sphere is aimed only at the preservation of cultural monuments and ethnic characteristics. The primary goal is not innovative development culture and the process of integration with other sectors of the national economy.

The Federal Law of the Russian Federation of December 27, 1991 “On the means of mass media”, Federal laws of December 1, 1995 “On state support of the media and book publishing of the Russian Federation”, dated August 22, 1996 “On state support of cinematography of the Russian Federation”, dated April 15, 1998 “On cultural values displaced to the USSR as a result of the Second World War and located on the territory of the Russian Federation,” Government Decree of March 25, 1999 “On state support of theatrical art in the Russian Federation” and other legal acts.

Considering the above legal sources, it is possible to determine the priority and long-term goals of the cultural policy of the Russian Federation. So, the priorities include:

development of a legal framework that meets new realities, which includes stimulating tax benefits for investors in the field of culture;

the operation of means to ensure the safety and security of state cultural values, as well as the possibility of creative work and the exercise of the right to a “free profession”;

establishment of measures that increase liability for crimes against the cultural heritage of the country.

Long-term goals are determined, firstly, by the formation of the ideological and moral foundations of a democratic legal state, and secondly, by the creation of conditions for the development and reproduction of the creative potential of society, as well as the formation of an undistorted historical consciousness and the creation cultural space countries.

And again, when analyzing the main legal documents, which include the main goals of cultural policy, it is clear that state guidelines are conservative in nature. However, the goals and objectives presented in the documents of the 90s are being successfully implemented in modern society.

Of particular interest is the proposal of the Ministry of Culture on the implementation of the main directions of state policy for the development of the sphere of culture and mass communications in the Russian Federation, agreed by the Government of the Russian Federation on June 1, 2006 No. MF-P44-2462. The document presents a state policy plan for the development of the cultural sector until 2015, aimed at preserving and developing culture, ensuring social stability, economic growth and national security of the state.

According to the Ministry of Culture, the preservation and development of a unified cultural and information space in Russia is due to the heterogeneity of the provision of services to the population by cultural organizations due to the geographical features of the country and a number of other economic factors. Thus, as the Ministry of Culture believes in this document, the situation gives rise to social inequality in creative development children and youth, social rehabilitation of people with disabilities and generally provides Negative influence on the social well-being of the population.

Based on this position, the Ministry of Culture proposes to develop standards for the provision of cultural organizations to the population, taking into account the new administrative division. To do this, it is necessary to develop a nomenclature public services in the field of culture and model standards, industry infrastructure, including in rural areas and small towns, which should provide for optimization of the existing network of cultural organizations. Optimization is mainly determined by the creation of multifunctional institutions - social and cultural centers, cultural and sports complexes, as well as mobile service systems, such as car clubs, bibliobuses.

Undoubtedly, by optimizing the organizational networks of culture, the state will be able to bring culture much faster and more efficiently onto the path of new development - innovative. Perhaps the situation with the shortage of the federal budget to improve the condition of cultural institutions, in particular in rural areas, will be resolved.

As a tool for achieving this goal, the question of improving the system of material incentives for specialists in the field of culture and art is raised. Many constituent entities of the Russian Federation have adopted targeted programs to support young professionals working in the field of culture. An example is the Decree of the Government of the Kurgan Region of October 14, 2013 “Development of culture in the Trans-Ural region for 2014-2020.”

The technical re-equipment of cultural facilities is also important. For these purposes, the Ministry of Culture proposes to develop natural and financial standards for resource provision of the cultural sphere.

Based on these provisions, taking into account the fact that the main resource for creating conditions for the provision of cultural services and guaranteeing their provision is the activities of cultural and art institutions, it is necessary to implement measures aimed at modernizing the network of these institutions. The Ministry of Culture is addressing this issue by proposing the need to adopt legal acts that establish guarantees and conditions for providing the population with cultural services, including club-type institutions, museums, and children's art schools. Undoubtedly, the adoption of legal acts to guarantee the conditions for providing the population with cultural services is relevant in the current situation. Provisions for the provision of cultural education and leisure in the country, fixed by regulations, will be able to raise the status of the cultural sector among the population as a whole.

The quality of cultural services, which largely depends on young professionals, remains an open question. Development of measures to attract talented youth to work in the industry, which, according to the Ministry of Culture, will expand the range and improve the quality of services in the field of culture, as well as speed up the implementation innovative methods work. The main task in the Ministry of Culture’s proposal is to modernize the system for advanced training of specialists and the development of standards for personnel requirements. These tasks, according to the author of the work, are very difficult to implement due to insufficient funding for cultural workers and the general non-prestigious status of professions related to the provision of services in the cultural sphere. First of all, to improve the quality of services and training of professionals, the state needs to create the best conditions for attracting young specialists who are ready to work productively.

The second part of the Ministry of Culture’s proposal on cultural policy is devoted to the preservation and development of the multinational cultural heritage of the peoples of Russia. The main aspects on this issue come down to improving legislation on objects of cultural heritage of the peoples of Russia, regulating the legal status of especially valuable historical and cultural monuments. Of particular relevance in connection with the need to form an integrated approach to the conservation of specially protected areas is the development of a state strategy for the formation of a system of places of interest, historical and cultural reserves in the Russian Federation.

Summing up the analysis of the target guidelines of the state’s cultural policy, it is worth noting that the course chosen in the 90s of the 20th century is also relevant in the modern situation. The main goals remain the preservation and support of the historical and cultural component of public life. In particular, it should be noted that the state provides support for improving creative projects, provides support in the form of a system government grants. An important role is also played by the material base of vocational education institutions: modernization of premises, provision of special equipment for efficient work, providing the necessary professional tools.

I would especially like to cancel the fact that, based on the proposal of the Ministry of Culture, one can talk about the gradual orientation of the cultural sphere towards the market through the introduction modern forms management, creating conditions for adapting the sphere of culture and mass communications to market conditions, stimulating an increase in the share of private financing, including the use of a partnership mechanism, the development of patronage and charity. The issue of integrating Russia into the world cultural process through the preparation and implementation of international projects in the field of culture, which contribute to the growth of the prestige of Russian culture, is being discussed.

Conclusion

When considering culture as a branch of the social sphere, it is necessary to remember that the main subjects are the individual and society. Therefore, the organization of public administration in this area should be formed taking into account the characteristics of public relations.

Having identified the main targets, state cultural policy must, first of all, satisfy the needs of all sectors of the national economy.

Today we can observe that culture is becoming a powerful lever for the socio-economic development of the country. The wealth of resources, both natural and human, creates very solid ground for Russia to enter a competitive international market through cultural integration. The ideological role of culture remains relevant today: the preservation of historical documents, monuments, the education of the younger generation with true knowledge of the history of their country will always be the highest goal of cultural policy.

A developed state management structure in the field of culture, represented by the Ministry, committees and services, creates all the conditions for achieving the main goals of cultural policy. Management strategy and tactics in the field of culture are very complex due to the polysemy of culture itself and the multi-level nature of its structure.

It is also worth noting that, unfortunately, the most pressing issue is still the issue of financing the cultural sphere. The author of the work believes that the problem of the federal budget shortage can be somewhat mitigated by dividing the financial functions of sociocultural policy between government investments and charitable and commercial sectors.

At the same time, the social significance of culture grows, and in times of crisis, it intensifies, as society’s need for a stabilizing factor of development, which is culture, intensifies. The activities of the state, which makes a significant contribution to determining the paths of cultural development of society as a whole and attracting appropriate resources, today is the most important prerequisite for the development of Russian culture.

Bibliography

1.Atamanchuk G.V. Ensuring the rationality of public administration. M., 2013. - 98 p.

2.Werner Yeager Paideia Education of the Ancient Greek (the era of great educators and educational systems) T. 2 Translation from German M.N. Botvinnik / “Greco-Latin Cabinet” by Yu.A. Shichalina, Moscow, 1997 - 203s

.Zapesotsky, A.S. Education: philosophy, cultural studies, politics M.: Nauka, 2012. - 456 p.

4.Culture in public life / Transl. with him. Z.V. Gorlova. Scientific ed. A.I. Arnoldov. M.: Mysl, 1999. - 244 p.

5.Levit S.Ya. The role of culture in the formation of personality. M.: Nauka, 2009. - 123 p.

.Mokhov N. Economics, planning and organization of culture. - Economic Issues, 2000, No. 9, 55-66 p.

7.Pakulina, I.S. Strategy for state regulation of the development of the sphere of social services // News of Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences. Vol. 1. Part I. Tula: Tula State University Publishing House, 2012. - 335 p.

.Rumyantsev A.M. Social and economic problems of our time: 2nd ed., M.: Nauka, 2011. - 441 p.

9.Sunik B.V. Material and technical base and provision of cultural institutions. M,: Sov. Russia, 1880. - 52 p.

.Tikhomirov Yu.A. Statecraft: problems and prospects. - Soviet State and Law, M. 1984, No. 6, - 87 p.

.Chirkin, V.E. State and municipal government: textbook / V.E. Chirkin. - M.: Lawyer, 2013. - 320 p.

.Shabaylov V.I. Legal regulation socio-cultural activities. Minsk: Science and Technology, 2001. - 183 p.

13.Organizational and managerial innovations in the field of culture. - M., NIIK, 2011. - 43-47 p.

14.Orlova Z.A. Social policy in the sphere of culture. //

“Guidelines for cultural policy” -1995, - No. 5. - 19 s.

.Sorochkin B.Yu. etc. Financing of culture in new economic conditions. // “Guidelines for cultural policy” - 2005, - No. 1. - 3-11 s.

16.Shishkin S.V. Economics and management in the sphere of culture: search for new models. - M., NIIK, 2012. - 23 p.

Public administration The sphere of culture is carried out by state authorities corresponding to the state structure of society.
The highest official of the Russian Federation, according to the current Constitution, is the President, elected in the Russian Federation by direct voting of citizens (i.e., receiving powers directly from them) and simultaneously endowed with a number of functions of both legislative and executive power. Issues of state management of the cultural sphere are addressed in Presidential Decrees and his legislative initiatives. These documents, preparing their analyzes and examinations, are carried out by cultural advisers working in the Office of the President.
Supreme body The legislative power in the Russian Federation is the Federal Assembly, consisting of two chambers: the Federation Council (formed from representatives of the legislative and executive powers of the constituent entities of the federation) and the State Duma, consisting of deputies elected by direct vote of citizens (for specific candidates and according to party lists). The main functions of the legislative (representative) power are the development and adoption of laws, approval state budget and control over its implementation, formation of executive authorities. All these functions in one way or another relate to issues of culture and the sphere of culture, and in some part they are directly devoted to it. Draft laws are developed and adopted The State Duma, then they are subject to consideration by the Federation Council and come into force after signing by the President. For the high-quality preparation and examination of draft laws and budgets on culture, evaluation of the activities of officials in the Duma, a deputy commission on culture and historical heritage was formed. The Commission invites experts and specialists and representatives of the public to its meetings and hearings as necessary.
The highest executive body in the Russian Federation is the Government of the Russian Federation, formed by decisions of the Federal Assembly and the President. The functions of the executive branch are the execution of laws and the approved budget, as well as the current state management of relevant sectors. In relation to the sphere of culture, these functions are carried out by the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, headed by the Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation. There are a number of departments within the structure of the Ministry of Culture - for branches of cultural activity (museums, librarianship, concert activities, etc.) and management functions (financing, control and inspection, etc.). In addition, the Ministry of Culture carries out constituent functions in relation to state cultural institutions of federal significance (Bolshoi Theater, Hermitage, Russian Museum, National Library, etc.).
The same structure of government bodies operates at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation: republics, territories, regions. Each of them has a senior official (president or governor), a legislative assembly (or Duma) and a government (administration). They carry out the same functions of state regulation, only in relation to the scale of a given subject of the federation (adopt and implement laws and the budget, form the necessary authorities in sectors and management functions), and under each legislative authority commissions are formed that deal with issues in the sphere of culture, and in The executive authorities include the relevant ministries (committees, departments) of culture, which, among other things, manage the corresponding network of cultural institutions.
At the local level (district, city), virtually the same scheme is reproduced: representative power (deputy corps) with the corresponding commissions, executive power (administration) with the corresponding cultural departments.
Issues of support and development of the cultural sphere affect the functions of other government bodies at all levels from local to federal. We are talking about such government services that are entrusted with the functions of non-departmental control: State Property Committee, Central Bank, prosecutor's office, tax office, law enforcement authorities, sanitary inspection, fire safety, etc.
For the sake of completeness of the picture of state management of the cultural sphere, mention should be made of the third (in relation to the legislative and executive) branch of state power - the judicial, i.e. the courts various levels(up to the federal level), in which it is also sometimes necessary to resolve issues related to the sphere of culture.

State management of the cultural sphere is carried out by state authorities corresponding to the state structure of society; the highest official of the Russian Federation, according to the current constitution, is the President, who is directly elected in the Russian Federation

vote of citizens (i.e., receiving powers directly from them) and simultaneously endowed with a number of functions of both legislative and executive power. Issues of state management of the cultural sphere are addressed in the decrees of the President and his legislative initiatives. These documents, their analysis and examination are carried out by cultural advisers working in the Presidential Administration.

The highest body of legislative power in the Russian Federation is the Federal Assembly, consisting of two chambers: the Federation Council (formed from the heads of legislative and executive power of the constituent entities of the federation) and the State Duma, consisting of deputies elected by direct vote of citizens (for specific candidates and according to party lists). The main functions of the legislative (representative) power are the development and adoption of laws, approval and control of the execution of the state budget, and the formation of executive authorities. All these functions, one way or another, relate to issues of culture and the sphere of culture, and in some part they are directly devoted to it. Draft laws are developed and adopted by the State Duma, then they are subject to consideration by the Federation Council and come into force after signing by the President. For the high-quality preparation and examination of draft laws and budgets on culture, and assessment of the activities of officials in the Duma, a deputy commission on culture and historical heritage was formed. The Commission invites experts and specialists and representatives of the public to its meetings and hearings as necessary.

The highest executive body in the Russian Federation is the Government of the Russian Federation, formed by decisions of the Federal Assembly and the President. The functions of the executive branch are the execution of laws and the approved budget, as well as the current state management of relevant sectors. In relation to the sphere of culture, these functions are carried out by the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, headed by the Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation. There are a number of departments within the structure of the Ministry of Culture - for branches of cultural activity (museums, librarianship, concert activities, etc.) and management functions (financing, control and inspection, etc.). In addition, the Ministry of Culture carries out constituent functions in relation to state cultural institutions of federal significance (Bolshoi Opera and Ballet Theater, Hermitage, Russian Museum, National Library, etc.).

The same structure of government bodies operates at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation: republics, territories, regions. Each of them has a senior official (president or governor), a legislative assembly (or Duma) and a government (administration). They carry out the same functions of state regulation, only in relation to the scale of a given subject of the federation (adopt and implement laws and the budget, form the necessary authorities by industry and management functions). And under each legislative body, commissions are formed that deal with cultural issues, and the executive bodies include the relevant ministries (or committees, or departments) of culture, which, among other things, manage the corresponding network of cultural institutions.

At the local level (district, city), virtually the same scheme is reproduced: representative power (deputy corps) with the corresponding commissions, executive power (administration) with the corresponding cultural departments.

Issues of support and development of the cultural sector affect the functions of other government bodies at all levels from local to federal. We are talking about such government services that are entrusted with the functions of non-departmental control: State Property Committee, Central Bank, Prosecutor's Office, Tax Inspectorate, law enforcement agencies, sanitary supervision, fire safety, etc. For the sake of completeness of the picture of public administration of the sphere of culture, it is worth mentioning the third (in relation to the legislative and executive) branch of state power - the judicial branch, i.e. courts of various levels (up to the federal), in which it is also sometimes necessary to resolve issues related to the sphere of culture.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

Introduction

Culture is a multi-valued social phenomenon that relates to the sphere of spiritual life of the country. Cultural values represent the wealth and dignity of the state.

In support of the above, we can cite the formulation of the concept of “culture”, set out in Article 2 of the Draft Federal Law “On Culture in the Russian Federation”: “culture is a set of distinctive features, values, traditions and beliefs inherent in a society or social group, which are expressed in the way of life and art."

CurrentWithtew This topic is that Russia is a social state and culture, being an important component in the social aspect of the country’s growth and development, requires a special state policy aimed at creating conditions that ensure a decent life and development of a citizen in society.

Understanding the importance of cultural development, the state faces the main question of how to carry out the management process in the social and cultural sphere in such a way as to ensure communicative accuracy and protection of information about the cultural life of the country.

Target This course work is the study and analysis of the organization of public administration in the field of culture.

In accordance with the goal, a number of tasks were identified.

1) determine the essence of the cultural sphere

2) analyze the development of the cultural sphere

3) identify the specifics of state cultural management

4) characterize the organization of state cultural management

Object research is the public administration system.

Subject research is the organization of management in the field of culture and art.

1 . CulturalWithfer as an object of control andWithsocial development

1.1 WITHverballyWiththere is culturalWithpheres

All sectors of the social sphere, including culture, are acquiring great importance in the development of social production, influencing the improvement and quality of life of citizens.

Considering the essence of the cultural sphere, first of all, it is necessary to analyze the concept of “culture”.

Analyzing the sources of domestic humanitarian knowledge, it can be noted that for quite a long time there was no consideration given to another meaning of culture, the sacred. Culture as a cult, veneration, primarily of a religious nature, was an integral part of ancient civilizations. Worship of the gods and adherence to certain customs were considered the highest value of the worldview of that era. In the ancient world, the term “paideia” (ancient Greek. RbydeYab- education, formation of a child, education, culture) embodies the unity of multiple meanings of cultures. The concept, which arose in the philosophy of the Sophists in 5 BC, became the subject of analysis by Isocrates and Xenophon and was developed by Plato in the dialogues “The Republic” and “The Laws”. The essence of paideia according to Plato is that the doctrine of the immortality of the soul is inseparable from the political program for the worthy education of a citizen, which is the foundation of the state structure. Thus, paideia becomes not only the meaning of politics, but also the meaning of the life of the citizen’s soul, which comes down to good upbringing, education, and therefore culture. Aristotle continued the development of the concept in his treatise “Politics”: according to his teaching, the unification of people into a single state is possible only through its education, that is, through the introduction of certain morals, philosophy, and laws. It was paideia education that Aristotle considered an important condition for happiness for every member of society. To sum up the analysis of this period, we can say that ancient man, comparing himself with other peoples, was proud of his mind, feelings and ability to live not only according to natural physiological laws, but also according to established moral standards. Despite the unstable political situation, when the foundations of citizenship give way to chaos, the culture has developed a purely ataraxic character, thereby preserving its inner peace.

The modern concept of “culture” sees its origins in the philosophy of the European Enlightenment, when interest in the material, material beginning of culture manifested itself. It is then that we can talk about the emergence of an entire cultural sphere as a subsystem of society. The postulate of I. Kant's philosophy is formed on the idea of separating the world of nature and the world of freedom, the human world of culture. A moral, and therefore cultural, person becomes a free person, he has the opportunity to determine the only correct path in life. For the first time, the highest material manifestation of culture is determined in the form of art. This is associated with the comprehensive development and growth of various types of arts, whose products today constitute the rich cultural heritage of European countries and Russia.

Today, the concept of “culture” refers to such a set of sectors of the national economy as the social sphere. Branches of the social sphere are becoming of great importance in the modern world. And culture has a direct impact on the state of the spiritual potential of society. The development of culture as a branch of the national economy is characterized by such indicators as the number of professional theaters, circuses, museums, club-cultural institutions, the number of public libraries, and large-scale competitive projects.

Culture as a product of social life and practice has a huge impact on people. People not only create cultural objects, but also acquire knowledge, thus studying and mastering their culture.

1.2 Development of culturalWithpheres

At present, when the country has entered into the implementation of a new economic model, the development of cultural industries is characterized, first of all, by the transition from the traditional cultural sphere to the so-called cultural industry. Undoubtedly, such a process is dictated by a change in the way of life due to innovative technologies, a sharp increase in intangible goods in the consumption structure, which are, for example, media consumption.

Considering culture as a sphere of consumption in direct dependence on the economy, it should be noted that for the period 2002-2009. the number of theaters, libraries and museums, as well as cultural and leisure institutions, has not decreased from the volume of gross product, therefore, it is inadmissible to conclude that there is a statistical dependence on the economic state of the country. On the contrary, it turns out that the crisis of 2008-2009. practically did not play a certain negative role in the dynamics of the number of cultural and art institutions, as well as in the activity of their attendance, with the only exception being cinemas. Thus, it turns out that the dynamics of the number of cultural institutions, and, accordingly, the development of the cultural sphere in Russia is determined by other reasons, independent of the growth of the economic factor. First of all, it is necessary to pay attention to the volume of government investment in the development of culture and art.

It is worth starting to trace the development of culture and the possibility of further improvement in the management of the cultural sphere with a fairly extensive period from 1980-2009. Analysis of this period shows that the decrease in the total number of institutions and the percentage of attendance affected only recreational institutions and libraries. According to statistics in Russia for the period from 1990-2009. the total number of various types of libraries decreased by 24.7%, and the number of registered users - by 27%.

In the course of government reforms relating to culture and art carried out over the years, it is worth noting the growth in the number of professional theaters and the expansion of the museum complex of the Russian Federation. It is also gratifying to say that the number of registered museums is constantly increasing and maintaining a certain pace. Thus, over three years, from 2005 to 2009, the number of museums increased by 10%, which is expressed in 254 new units. First of all, the increase in number affected local history museums, which, as of 2009, make up the majority of the museum complex in Russia. According to Rosstat, the leaders in museum attendance are the Northwestern and Central Federal Districts. But, despite the positive dynamics and growth of indicators and the efforts of the authorities, the general condition of cultural institutions and, accordingly, the cultural sphere remains quite difficult.

The features of the modern development of the cultural sphere can be briefly characterized, firstly, by a change in the system of budget financing and the expansion of the scope of application of various federal target programs aimed at improving the cultural sector. Secondly, the presence of developed competition in creative and especially entertainment industries, such as theater, circus, and musical art, has become primarily new for the cultural sphere.

It should also be said that there is an uneven development of the cultural sphere throughout the country due to the colossally different socio-economic development of the regions. It is this fact that does not make it possible for organizations and cultural institutions to attract funds from large investors, unused financial resources of entities that represent small and medium-sized businesses in each subject of the country. Contractual procedures with private individuals interested in sponsorship are also complex.

In this case, issues such as methodological support for the interaction of cultural and artistic sectors with the economic and political life of countries, both in general and in individual constituent entities of the Russian Federation, begin to acquire growing importance. An important role, undoubtedly, is played by the national cultural policy of the state, which would put culture on the path to a prestigious branch of the socio-cultural sphere. Undoubtedly, the development of citizens' interest in cultural sectors will be much higher if the state can develop the necessary support and provide the opportunity to take the path of innovation and unification with other sectors of the national economy.

2 . Go organizationWithhitWithgovernmental management inWithcultural sector

2.1 WITHmanagement structureVWithcultural sector

cultural department government

Also, the objects of management are various cultural institutions: libraries, houses and palaces of culture, clubs, cinemas, circuses, museums.

The Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, according to the Government Regulations dated June 6, 1997, is a federal executive body pursuing state policy in the field of culture, art, protection and use of historical and cultural heritage. Also within the competence of the Ministry of Culture is the implementation of state regulation and coordination of the activities of other federal executive bodies in this area in cases established by federal laws, presidential decrees and government decrees.

The main tasks of the Ministry of Culture are:

Implementation of state policy in the field of culture, which provides the necessary conditions for the implementation of the constitutional rights of citizens of the Russian Federation to freedom of creativity, participation in cultural life and use of cultural institutions.

Promoting the development of national cultures of the peoples of Russia.

Determining goals and priorities in the development of certain types of cultural activities, professional arts, museums and libraries, folk art, education and science in the field of culture

Development and implementation, in accordance with the international obligations of the Russian Federation, of systems of measures to prevent the illegal export and import of cultural property and the transfer of ownership of cultural property.

Exercising state control over the export of cultural property from Russia, compliance with the established procedure for the sale of antiques

Management of activities of subordinate organizations.

Issues of support and development of the cultural sector also affect the functions of other government bodies: the State Property Committee, the Central Bank, the prosecutor's office, the tax inspectorate and others.

Thus, the structure of government authorities in the field of culture represents a clearly structured hierarchy of departments that clearly delimit their competence. From the analysis of these departments, it follows that all components of the cultural industry are under the jurisdiction of special services and committees, which are regulated by the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. There are also certain specialized federal services that provide management of certain cultural sectors.

2.2 ABOUTWithnew directionsthWithhitWithgovernment policy inWithcultural sector

The most important areas of cultural activity are defined in the adopted Federal Law of October 9, 1992 No. 3612 - I “Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on culture”:

Identification, study, protection, restoration and use of historical and cultural monuments;

Fiction, cinematography, stage, plastic, musical art;

Architecture and design, other types and genres of art; artistic folk arts and crafts, folk culture in such manifestations as languages, dialects and dialects, folklore, customs and rituals, historical toponyms;

Amateur (amateur) artistic creativity, museum work and collecting;

Book publishing and library science; archival work; TV; radio and other audiovisual media in terms of the creation and dissemination of cultural values;

Aesthetic education, art education, pedagogical activities in this area.

Article 1 of the Federal Law of October 9, 1992 “Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on culture” also outlines the priority tasks of the state in the cultural sphere:

Ensuring and protecting the constitutional right of citizens of the Russian Federation to cultural activities;

Creation of legal guarantees for the free cultural activities of associations of citizens, peoples and other ethnic communities of the Russian Federation;

Determination of principles and legal norms of relations between subjects of cultural activities;

Determination of the principles of state cultural policy, legal norms of state support for culture and guarantees of state non-interference in creative processes.

Analyzing the tasks outlined in the 90s, it is necessary to note the fact that culture is considered by the state as an independent industry that has no connection, for example, with the economy and politics of the country. From the list of tasks it is clear that state policy in the cultural sphere is aimed only at the preservation of cultural monuments and ethnic characteristics. The primary task is not the innovative development of culture and the process of integration with other sectors of the national economy.

Of greatest importance for management in the field of culture are the Federal Law of the Russian Federation of December 27, 1991 “On the Mass Media”, Federal Laws of December 1, 1995 “On State Support of the Mass Media and Book Publishing of the Russian Federation”, dated August 22, 1996 "On state support for cinematography of the Russian Federation", dated April 15, 1998. "On cultural values moved to the USSR as a result of the Second World War and located on the territory of the Russian Federation", Government resolution dated March 25, 1999 "On state support theatrical art in the Russian Federation" and other legal acts.

Considering the above legal sources, it is possible to determine the priority and long-term goals of the cultural policy of the Russian Federation. So, the priorities include:

Development of a legal framework that meets new realities, which includes incentive tax benefits for investors in the field of culture;

The operation of means to ensure the safety and security of state cultural property, as well as the possibility of creative work and the exercise of the right to a “free profession”;

Establishment of measures that increase liability for crimes against the cultural heritage of the country.

According to the Ministry of Culture, the preservation and development of a unified cultural and information space in Russia is due to the heterogeneity of the provision of services to the population by cultural organizations due to the geographical features of the country and a number of other economic factors. Thus, as the Ministry of Culture believes in this document, the situation gives rise to social inequality in the creative development of children and youth, the social rehabilitation of people with disabilities and, in general, has a negative impact on the social well-being of the population.

Based on this position, the Ministry of Culture proposes to develop standards for the provision of cultural organizations to the population, taking into account the new administrative division. To do this, it is necessary to develop a nomenclature of public services in the field of culture and model standards, infrastructure of the industry, including in rural areas and small towns, which should provide for the optimization of the existing network of cultural organizations. Optimization is mainly determined by the creation of multifunctional institutions - social and cultural centers, cultural and sports complexes, as well as mobile service systems, such as car clubs, bibliobuses.

The quality of cultural services, which largely depends on young professionals, remains an open question. Developing measures to attract talented young people to work in the industry, which, according to the Ministry of Culture, will expand the range and improve the quality of services in the field of culture, as well as accelerate the introduction of innovative work methods. The main task in the Ministry of Culture’s proposal is to modernize the system for advanced training of specialists and the development of standards for personnel requirements. These tasks, according to the author of the work, are very difficult to implement due to insufficient funding for cultural workers and the general non-prestigious status of professions related to the provision of services in the cultural sphere. First of all, to improve the quality of services and training of professionals, the state needs to create the best conditions for attracting young specialists who are ready to work productively.

Summing up the analysis of the target guidelines of the state’s cultural policy, it is worth noting that the course chosen in the 90s of the 20th century is also relevant in the modern situation. The main goals remain the preservation and support of the historical and cultural component of public life. In particular, it should be noted that the state provides support for the improvement of creative projects and provides support in the form of a system of state grants. An important role is also played by the material base of vocational education institutions: modernization of premises, provision of special equipment for effective work, provision of the necessary professional tools.

I would especially like to cancel the fact that, based on the proposal of the Ministry of Culture, one can talk about the gradual orientation of the cultural sector towards the market by introducing modern forms of management, creating conditions for adapting the cultural sector and mass communications to market conditions, stimulating an increase in the share of private financing, including the use of the mechanism partnerships, development of patronage and charity. The issue of integrating Russia into the world cultural process through the preparation and implementation of international projects in the field of culture, which contribute to the growth of the prestige of Russian culture, is being discussed.

Conclusion

Having identified the main targets, state cultural policy must, first of all, satisfy the needs of all sectors of the national economy.

BibliographicWithcueWithpiWithOK

1. Atamanchuk G.V. Ensuring the rationality of public administration. M., 2013. - 98 p.

2. Werner Yeager Paideia Education of the ancient Greek (the era of great educators and educational systems) T. 2 Translation from German M.N. Botvinnik / “Greco-Latin Cabinet” by Yu.A. Shichalina, Moscow, 1997 - 203s

3. Zapesotsky, A.S. Education: philosophy, cultural studies, politics M.: Nauka, 2012. - 456 p.

4. Culture in public life / Transl. with him. Z.V. Gorlova. Scientific ed. A.I. Arnoldov. M.: Mysl, 1999. - 244 p.

5. Levit S.Ya. The role of culture in the formation of personality. M.: Nauka, 2009. - 123 p.

6. Mokhov N. Economics, planning and organization of culture. - Economic Issues, 2000, No. 9, 55-66 p.

7. Pakulina, I.S. Strategy for state regulation of the development of the sphere of social services // News of Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences. Vol. 1. Part I. Tula: Tula State University Publishing House, 2012. - 335 p.

8. Rumyantsev A.M. Social and economic problems of our time: 2nd ed., M.: Nauka, 2011. - 441 p.

9. Sunik B.V. Material and technical base and provision of cultural institutions. M,: Sov. Russia, 1880. - 52 p.

10. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Statecraft: problems and prospects. - Soviet State and Law, M. 1984, No. 6, - 87 p.

11. Chirkin, V.E. State and municipal management: textbook / V.E. Chirkin. - M.: Lawyer, 2013. - 320 p.

12. Shabailov V.I. Legal regulation of socio-cultural activities. Minsk: Science and Technology, 2001. - 183 p.

13. Organizational and managerial innovations in the field of culture. - M., NIIK, 2011. - 43-47 p.

14. Orlova Z.A. Social policy in the sphere of culture. //

“Guidelines for cultural policy” -1995, - No. 5. - 19 s.

15. Sorochkin B.Yu. and others. Financing of culture in new economic conditions. // “Guidelines for cultural policy” - 2005, - No. 1. - 3-11 s.

16. Shishkin S.V. Economics and management in the sphere of culture: search for new models. - M., NIIK, 2012. - 23 p.

17. Economics and cultural management. // Express-inform. - Ways to restructure the management system in the field of culture at the territorial level. - 2000, - No. 5. - 12 s.

18. Onufrienko G.V. Models of cultural policy in market conditions. (Results of scientific information research). // Material base spheres of culture: experience in solving managerial, scientific and technical problems. - Scientific - information Sat., - 2006. - 11 p.

Posted on Allbest.ru

Organization of public administration in the field of culture.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Similar documents