Professional equipment plays a special role in the work of specialists in creative professions. Special devices not only emphasize the level of skill and a serious approach to business, but also help to fully realize your idea. Therefore, professional photographers and designers do not skimp on the essentials and prefer monitors with better color reproduction. When the image is processed, the monitor becomes the eyes of the photographer. The correct transfer of all colors and halftones is the key to success. This means that the main advantages of a successful model for working in a photo editor are realistic colors, excellent brightness and contrast ratios, the ability to manually calibrate colors, and screen coverage.
The last parameter causes a lot of controversy. A glossy monitor often attracts the eye of a connoisseur bright colors with its juicy palette. But first impressions are deceiving. Most glossy monitors are highly glare, they reflect the surrounding objects, in bright light, the color is often distorted. Matte screens, in turn, can slightly muffle the colors, but at the same time give a clear picture without glare. Fortunately, many modern monitors allow you to adjust colors manually. At the same time, in professional series of devices, matte, as a rule, does not interfere with color saturation. Therefore, matte screens for the most part are better suited for working with photos.
Also, when choosing a monitor, the photographer is advised to pay attention to the resolution, dynamic contrast, type and quality of the backlight. At the same time, despite the popularity of curved screens as elongated as possible, a standard widescreen display is better suited for professional needs. Not the last value for photo processing is the matrix. The best color reproduction is provided by IPS, the most common matrix among this class.
Today, the choice of professional monitors is quite large. However, not all devices that are positioned as professional, really are. At the same time, monitors for photographers are diverse. Each of them has its own advantages, and sometimes disadvantages. We studied many devices and chose the best ones both in terms of general indicators and specific properties, guided by user reviews, expert reviews and technical descriptions.
TOP 5 best monitors for photographers
5 DELL P2415Q
Profitable price. The most compact
Country: USA (made in China)
Average price: 31,211 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.3
The review of the best monitors for photographers begins with the most inexpensive, and therefore the most popular model, which is characterized by good color reproduction and excellent detail. Although this monitor is not in the full sense professional device, it is endowed with everything necessary for fruitful work with photographs and various graphics.
The 23.8-inch screen is quite compact, but still has a resolution of 3840 by 2160 pixels, usually found in larger and more expensive monitors. At the same time, a high-quality IPS matrix differs smallest size pixel, which makes the image very clear. In addition, colors can be adjusted manually. The model will also please with a contrast ratio of 1000 and a brightness of 300 cd/m2. Anti-reflective coating with a slight glow effect makes the image on the screen look like a photo on high-quality glossy paper. Flicker-Free technology evens out the backlight and prevents flicker.
4 Viewsonic VP2772
The best semi-professional monitor
Country: USA (made in China)
Average price: 43,789 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.5
The semi-professional monitor of the rapidly developing American company Viewsonic is recognized by many experts optimal combination prices and quality. Russian experts often even put it on a par with the best professional screens. The 27-inch ultra-high-resolution monitor is crisp, and thanks to GB LED backlighting, it has a wide spectral coverage. Also to the advantages of the display is a high level of dynamic contrast, which significantly improves the quality of dark or bright photos.
In addition to excellent color reproduction, the screen will surprise you with such a useful option as 90-degree rotation. The monitor is easy to turn on the stand from the usual vertical mode to portrait mode. Therefore, the model is convenient for processing images of any orientation. Also, the advantages include the ability to connect multiple devices to the monitor, color calibration, and so on.
3 ASUS ProArt PA329Q
Best functionality
Country: Taiwan (made in China)
Average price: 99,520 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.7
The top three of the best monitors for a photographer is opened by a professional display of a world famous brand. The 32-inch diagonal is large enough for comfortable work. At the same time, the model is endowed with the highest levels of brightness and dynamic contrast in the category, and the color reproduction of the screen can be easily adjusted manually.
In addition to the rich color, Asus should also be praised for its functionality. The presence of four HDMI inputs can be called a record. Thanks to them, up to four video sources are connected in parallel to the monitor. The Picture-in-Picture function will allow you to display on the screen a signal from two different sources at the same time. Also, the monitor is equipped with a memory card reader that allows you to view photos and videos directly from a memory card, without using a computer. An added advantage steel built-in stereo speakers with a power of 3 W and a headphone output.
2 Acer ProDesigner BM320
The finest detail
Country: Taiwan
Average price: 84,410 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.8
The second place in the ranking is deservedly occupied by a popular among photographers and relatively inexpensive model with a diagonal of 32 inches. Acer ProDesigner is the perfect choice for true photography and design gurus. Home feature monitor is the finest detail, combined with rich colors that can be adjusted if desired, as well as a natural matte finish that does not drown out colors.
However, Acer can be proud of not only the picture quality. Unlike most analogues, the monitor supports DVI, MHL and other digital interfaces, which makes it easy to transmit a video signal different ways. The screen also features four USB hub ports, DisplayPort and Mini DisplayPort inputs. At the same time, the ability to adjust the height and rotate the monitor by 90 degrees provides additional comfort and ease of use.
1 NEC MultiSync PA302W
Best for photo work
Country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: 128,590 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.9
Review leader best screens for processing photos and various images becomes the monitor of a Japanese company specializing primarily in high-level professional equipment. A diagonal of just under 30 inches and a resolution of 2560x1600 is enough to comfortably edit and process even the smallest details in the photo. The GB LED backlight also contributes to image accuracy and richness.
At the same time, there is no doubt about the correspondence of the image on the screen to what will turn out in the end. The developer equipped NEC with a semi-gloss anti-reflective coating that mimics the surface of a printed photo as closely as possible. Photographers note a large margin of brightness, rich functionality, stability and convenient manual color calibration. In addition, the monitor has a good response speed and a refresh rate of 85Hz.
With the advent of the digital age, the world of photography has changed dramatically. Just a few years ago, we all actively photographed and ran to the photo lab to print our photos. A little later, we started printing pictures at home using inkjet or sublimation printers. And now? Can you remember when you last time did you print the photos? I caught myself thinking that for five years I had not printed anything. The need has disappeared. Our photos are now completely digital. We watch them on the monitors of our computers, put them online and thus share them with our friends.
That is why the second most important tool for contemporary photographer, it doesn’t matter whether he is a professional or a simple amateur, after digital camera is a monitor. But not all monitors are the same. And the point here is not at all in size, although they, of course, matter. Have you paid attention to the fact that the same images on different monitors look completely different? Somewhere the picture looks juicy, somewhere faded, somewhere warmer, and somewhere in cold colors. In such a situation, it is almost impossible to draw a conclusion about how the image actually looks. Moreover, if you process photos on the wrong monitor, then there is a good chance that your work will be beautiful only on your monitor. The rest will see oversaturated or vice versa images with a color balance shifted in one direction or another. The only way out of this situation is to use the right monitor. To date, the best monitors for working with color have been and are monitors with cathode ray tubes. But their era is over. The time of laser monitors has not yet come, so we have to choose monitors with an LCD matrix.
So, what characteristics should such a monitor have?
1. Matrix type. There are several types of LCD matrices that differ in manufacturing technology and, as a result, in image reproduction quality. There are four types of matrices on the market today: TN, PVA, MVA and IPS. IPS matrices are best suited for working with color. This type of LCD matrix has the most correct color reproduction, but also the most high cost. Less suitable for image processing are monitors with PVA and MVA matrices. The most common cheap TN matrices are completely unsuitable.
2. Viewing angle. It should be as wide as possible. Cheap matrices have a very narrow viewing angle, and even with a slight change in the viewing angle, the image begins to darken, and the colors are distorted. The ISP LCD matrix has the best viewing angle parameters.
3. The surface of the matrix. Despite the fashion current trend production of glossy screens, this coating option is not suitable for a monitor designed for imaging. The surface must be matte.
4. Backlight. For correct image processing an important factor is the illumination uniformity. It should be perfectly even over the entire surface, without highlights at the edges. LED backlighting would be preferable. In this case, the monitor should reproduce a deep black color through which the matrix backlight shines through.
5. Size. Despite the fact that size is of secondary importance, its role in image processing, and especially retouching, cannot be underestimated. The most convenient range for work is 22-26 inches diagonally. The most popular is the diagonal of 24 inches.
6. Color gamut. The ability of a monitor to display an extended range of colors. Images on such monitors look richer than on conventional models. But there is a potential problem with this feature. If the main goal of the photographer is to process photographs and then upload them, for example, to the network or transfer them to someone on digital media, then the resulting beautiful juicy picture when viewed on another monitor will look sluggish and lifeless. Therefore, calibration of monitors with extended color gamut is required.
Now that we have sorted out the requirements for a monitor for a photographer, let's move on to an overview of the monitors on the market modern models. We deliberately omit the models of the expensive professional segment, the prices for which are beyond 1000 euros. Let's dwell on budget models of monitors, which, nevertheless, have a very good performance and popular with advanced photographers.
1. ASUS PA248q
2.Dell U2412m
3. Nec MultiSync PA241w
4.HP ZR2440w
ASUS PA248q
Good functional monitor for professional work with color. It has a strict minimalist design. Compared to the previous lamp model, it has become a little thinner and more elegant. Has an attractive price. But the quality of ASUS products has recently become a controversial issue.
Specifications:
Diagonal: 24”
LCD matrix type: IPS
Resolution: 1920x1200
Response time: 6ms
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Contrast: 1000:1/80000000:1
Viewing angles: 178°/178°
Cost: 16,000 - 18,000 rubles
Advantages:
Quality materials and precise assembly
Convenient management
fast matrix
94.9% sRGB color gamut
4-output USB hub with USB 3.0 support
Disadvantages:
High brightness even at minimum settings
Matte matrix with a strong crystalline effect
Problems with uneven backlighting on a dark background
DELL U2412m
A novelty from DELL, which consistently produces consistently high-quality products. The presented model is characterized, first of all, by its inexpensive cost, which became possible due to the use of an economical e-ISP matrix from LG.Display.
Specifications:
Diagonal: 24”
LCD type: e-IPS
Resolution: 1920x1200
Response time: 8ms
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Viewing angles: 178°/178°
Cost: 13,000 - 15,000 rubles
Advantages:
Stylish modern design
Very comfortable ergonomic stand
96.4% sRGB color gamut
Good color reproduction at factory settings
Low price
fast matrix
Wide brightness range
Disadvantages:
Poor backlight uniformity
Backlight flickering
Perceptible crystalline effect
Nec MultiSync PA241w
The most expensive model presented in this review. The professional series of NEC monitors, to which this model also belongs, are practically not inferior to the products of such eminent companies Eizo and LaCie. This monitor is based on the P-ISP matrix from the same LG.Display company. The same matrix, for example, is used in DELL U2410 monitors.
Specifications:
Diagonal: 24”
LCD type: P- IPS
Resolution: 1920x1200
Response time: 8ms
Brightness: 360cd/m2
Contrast: 1000:1
Viewing angles: 178°/178°
Cost: 34,000 - 36,000 rubles
Advantages:
Quality materials
Light sensor
Great opportunities for fine-tuning the monitor
Ergonomic stand
Weak crystal effect
fast matrix
Functional software included
Perfectly tuned sRGB mode
Adjustable black level
Wide range of dimming
Disadvantages:
Very high price compared to competitors
High frequency hum during operation
Highlighted corners on a black background
Poor emulation of color standards
High power consumption
No HDMI
HP ZR2440w
This monitor model is a direct competitor to DELL U2412m, because it is built on exactly the same e-IPS matrix. The only difference is the higher brightness limit and appearance. It is also important that HP products in Russia are traditionally represented good service and good software.
Specifications:
Diagonal: 24”
LCD type: e-IPS
Resolution: 1920x1200
Response time: 6ms
Brightness: 350cd/m2
Contrast: 1000:1/2000000:1
Viewing angles: 178°/178°
Cost: 18,000 - 21,000 rubles
Advantages:
Stylish case made of quality materials
High quality color reproduction without additional adjustments
High speed matrix
Wide range of sensor adjustment without loss of contrast
Ergonomic stand
Convenient menu
Low crystal effect
No extraneous noise during operation
Disadvantages:
Relatively high price
Pseudo-octal matrix
93.6% sRGB compliant
Findings:
The presented models have very similar specifications, due to the use by manufacturers of a virtually identical LCD matrix manufactured by LG.Display. The only exception is the NEC monitor with a slightly different matrix, but still the same LG. The choice of 24-inch monitor models is extremely small and you have to choose based on brand preferences, wallet size and taste preferences. I hope this article will at least partially help in this choice.
Stay in touch!
Publication date: 14.05.2015
Literally 10-15 years ago, every photographer faced a painful choice in the process of creating a picture. It began with determining the type of film and ended only in the process of developing a photograph: the selection of photo chemistry, developers, attenuators, filters, enlargers, photo glosses and even a red lamp for " black room". In our time, this choice has remained the same painful and languid. Only the objects have changed - now there are many more of them, and they have become digital. It's not about the choice of photographic equipment and accessories. I want to talk about choosing components for a computer that will be optimal for working with digital photography.
With this article, I will begin the cycle of materials “Computer for the Photographer”. And the first topic of our cycle will be the choice of monitor.
The monitor is your eyes. When choosing a monitor for working with photography, it is very important to take into account its characteristics, because the final result of your work (the combination of color and light of the picture you want to show) completely depends on them. A photographer, like any creative person, completely relies on his feelings. Just as a musician trusts his ear, a photographer counts on his eye. To your eyes. His main task is to convey to others what he saw through the camera lens, preserving all the colors and moods of the plot.
What should be the ideal monitor for a photographer? To answer this question, let's define the basic requirements. Firstly, the monitor matrix must support the sRGB color gamut as much as possible (we will talk about this below). Secondly, an IPS type matrix must be installed in the monitor. When choosing a monitor, you also need to consider the size, viewing angle, surface type, and screen backlight. Let's take a closer look at each characteristic.
Matrix type
The matrix is the heart of the monitor. When choosing a monitor for a computer, you, in fact, choose a matrix. Almost all other characteristics of the monitor depend on this choice. Let's look at the types of liquid crystal matrices.
To date, the main technologies for the manufacture of LCD displays are TN, IPS and MVA.
Matrix TN is the simplest, while it has the highest response time (that is, the picture on the screen is updated relatively quickly). In the past they were quite widespread. TN matrices are the cheapest. The benefits of this technology end there. Matrices of this type are characterized by certain disadvantages: small viewing angles, low contrast, poor color reproduction and the inability to obtain perfect black. The last point is especially critical when working with photographs. You will never distinguish a failed shadow from just a dark area by eye.
The matrix of the LCD monitor, manufactured by technology IPS(also known as SFT), is currently the only sensor capable of always delivering the full color depth of sRGB. An indisputable advantage of this technology is wide viewing angles reaching 140°. Based on this technology, there are already a number of improvements called H-IPS, AS-IPS, AFFS, etc. For example, H-IPS technology outperforms IPS with reduced response time and increased contrast levels. With the advent of AFFS technology, the viewing angle and brightness have increased. This technology is now used in the manufacture of tablet PCs and smartphones. Each display manufacturer (NEC, Hitachi, LG, etc.) improves the modifications of IPS matrices every year, allowing these to improve the performance of monitors.
Technology MVA(multi-domain vertical alignment), developed by Fujitsu, has become a compromise between TN and IPS technologies. The advantages of MVA technology are deep blacks (high contrast), and not gray, as in TN-matrices, and wide viewing angles (up to 170 °). The disadvantages are the loss of detail in the shadows and the dependence of the color balance of the image on the angle of view. This technology also has several modifications: Samsung PVA, MVA-Premium, etc.
However, even now there are professional photographers who work with outdated CRT monitors. And all because so far there are very few affordable LCD monitors that can compete in image quality with a kinescope.
Color gamut and number of colors
Perhaps this is the most main parameter monitor if it is designed to work with color. Sometimes there is confusion with the concepts of "color gamut" and "number of colors". Most often, these characteristics are presented in the description of the monitor (usually it is 16.2 or 16.7 million). The color gamut and the number of colors are two complementary things: the color gamut determines what range of colors the monitor can show, and the “number of colors” parameter determines how many gradations it can break this range into to reflect intermediate shades and midtones. Color gamut is a hardware characteristic of a monitor: on a monitor with a larger color gamut, you will be able to get purer, more saturated colors.
The "number of colors" parameter determines the difference between two adjacent colors - the greater the number of colors, the smaller this difference. The entire space of colors reproduced by the monitor is divided into 16.2 or 16.7 million gradations. Ask certain color we can only up to a specific color gradation. Accordingly, if this space (color gamut) increases, and the number of gradations (colors) remains the same, then the difference between two adjacent colors inevitably grows. It turns out that, on the one hand, a monitor with a large color gamut can show more colors in the physical sense of the word, but, on the other hand, it does it less accurately. In practice, such a lack of colors is noticeable on smooth gradients: transverse stripes appear on them, each of which corresponds to one gradation. This effect can be seen by stretching, say, a gradient from red to black across the entire screen: you will see narrow uniform transverse stripes on it, even on the best LCD monitor. The only possible way out is to increase the color depth to 30 bits (so that each of the three components would be assigned 10 bits). At the moment, only single monitors can handle 30-bit color. Their cost is from 100,000 rubles. For example, NEC SpectraView Reference 2180WG LED.
Let's get back to color gamut. For a visual description of the range of reproducible colors, a diagram is used in which a horseshoe-shaped figure depicts the entire range of colors available to human vision. Pure colors are located along the edges of this figure, and as they approach the center, they mix, eventually forming a point of white.
Images on monitors with a wide range of colors look richer than on conventional models. Therefore, calibration of monitors with extended color gamut is required. For amateur use in the style of "plug and play" they are unlikely to fit.
Contrast and Brightness
Monitor contrast is expressed as the ratio between maximum and minimum brightness on a white and black background, respectively. Brightness is one of strengths LCD monitor. This is the amount of light emitted by the display. If the brightness of the monitor is high enough, this is necessarily indicated in advertising booklets as one of the main advantages of the monitor. But sometimes the specifications of the monitor do not match the real ones. This also applies to brightness. If you can’t rely on the monitor’s passport data, then how can you evaluate its brightness? It is best to turn on the monitor and set its contrast and brightness to the maximum. If at the same time the image turns out to be too bright and a decrease in brightness is required for comfortable work, then it is safe to say that the brightness margin of the monitor is quite sufficient.
Viewing angle
The maximum vertical or horizontal viewing angle is defined as the viewing angle from which the image contrast is at least 10:1. Image contrast is the ratio of maximum brightness on a white background to minimum brightness on a black background.
For the photographer, an important circumstance is the fact that when viewing an image at an angle to the monitor surface, there is not a drop in contrast, but color distortions. For example, red turns to yellow and green turns to blue. At the same time, such distortions manifest themselves differently for different models, and for some, they are already noticeable at a slight angle, which is much smaller than the viewing angle. Therefore, comparing monitors in terms of viewing angles is basically wrong. More precisely, it is possible to compare, but such a comparison has no practical significance.
Thus, the viewing angle should tend to be as wide as possible. Cheap matrices have a very narrow viewing angle, and with even a slight change in the viewing angle, the image begins to darken and the colors are distorted. The ISP LCD matrix has the best viewing angle parameters.
A good example of a photo editing monitor is the NEC MultiSync PA241W. This is a 24" TFT P-IPS monitor with a 1000:1 screen contrast ratio and a 178° viewing angle. This monitor is capable of displaying over 1 billion colors.
Screen surface
And here everything is not so simple. The screen surface is very important characteristic. There are two types: matte and glossy.
The glossy surface of the monitor is less convenient for work, as it reflects all light sources and illuminated objects that are in front of the screen and behind the back of the person working at the computer. Reflections greatly interfere when working with a photograph, you often have to strain your eyes and peer into the picture. But glossy displays are more “bright”, they have more saturated, intense and contrasting color reproduction, and they display deep blacks well. These are pluses.
Matte surfaces do not have a reflective effect. They are more convenient to use, although the picture on them looks a little “poorer”. But this applies not so much to working with graphics, but to working at a computer in general.
Size (diagonal) and resolution of the monitor
This is exactly the parameter where the principle “the more the better” does not work. And even harmful. Why? Let's figure it out.
First, the larger the monitor, the more resolution it needs. As a result, this is a load on the video card. If we purchase a more powerful video card, this increases the total cost of the computer. Secondly, a large monitor is not needed for processing at all. The photographer at work always increases the photo by 300-500%. This makes it easier to correct small defects. Accordingly, why do you need a large monitor, if in any case you have to enlarge the photo? However, you shouldn't waste time on trifles... A 24- or 27-inch monitor with a screen resolution of 1920x1200 and 2560x1440, respectively, is enough for comfortable work. And if you really want and the budget allows you to purchase a powerful video card (or even two in SLI mode), then you can use a 30-inch monitor with a resolution of 2560x1600. For example, this monitor might be an HP ZR30w.
IPS-matrices are best suited for working with color. This type of LCD matrix has the most correct color reproduction, but also a higher cost. Less suitable for image processing are monitors with PVA and MVA matrices. Quite common cheap TN matrices are not suitable at all. The recommended screen size is at least 24 inches. If you are going to use the monitor in a brightly lit room or in front of a window, a monitor with a matte screen is optimal. But you can hang the window and turn off the light, and enjoy a rich and natural picture from the glossy screen of your monitor.
For ease of understanding, I have divided our recommended monitors into two subcategories: regular and professional. If you are a beginner and still not good at color and color calibration, your unconditional choice is a regular monitor. When choosing a conventional LCD monitor for photography, follow the specifications in the previous paragraph. The manufacturer is not so critical. It can be a device from Samsung, LG, Asus, Dell, etc.
Choosing a professional monitor is quite difficult. These are monitors from NEC, QUATO, EIZO, etc. For comfortable work, the initial models of this segment (for example, NEC Multisync PA241W or NEC Multisync LCD 2490WUXI2) are suitable. Some professional monitors have a built-in calibrator (for example, the Eizo ColorEdge CG276W model, which costs about 170,000 rubles). And the flagship monitor from NEC Display Solutions is the NEC SpectraView Reference 302. Due to its impressive size (30 inches), high resolution(2560x1600, 16:10) and excellent image performance uniformity, this monitor is ideal for the most demanding applications (pre-press and on-screen viewing of printed plates, as well as imaging from professional quality color reproduction). The average price of this monitor is 178,000 rubles.
As you can see, there is a choice for any budget. The main thing is to properly dispose of them and choose a monitor that meets the requirements of high-quality work with photography. Now you can do it without much effort.
The choice of monitor for a photographer largely determines the result of his work. The task of this device is to convey colors as accurately as possible and have a number of other properties. What to rely on when choosing a model? You can deal with the problem by analyzing the main parameters, as well as based on the rating of popular models, reviews of experts and users.
Color gamut and number of colors
These parameters are the most important when choosing a screen. Color gamut is an indicator that determines the range that a monitor can display. The higher this value, the purer and more saturated colors are displayed on the screen. The term "number of colors" characterizes the number of shades between two neighbors in the spectrum. A larger value of the parameter allows you to "smooth out" this difference.
Colors displayed on a computer screen are broken into certain number gradations. You can set a specific color up to a specific gradation, which means that with an increase in the color range, relative to the number of colors, the difference between the tones adjacent in the spectrum also grows. A large gap between the first and second indicators leads to the appearance of transverse bands on smooth gradients.
Attention! Extended range monitors require mandatory calibration.
Matrix type
The parameter that you should pay attention to in the first place. All other characteristics depend on it. For each type of monitors, matrices of varying complexity are used. LCD monitors are as follows:
The first type is equipped the simplest matrix, which is characterized by the fastest possible response, i.e. updating the picture. At the same time, this outdated model has a number of disadvantages. TN-matrix has a small viewing angle, poor color reproduction, low contrast. One of the main disadvantages is the inability to accurately display black.
The IPS matrix is able to effectively convey depth in the sRGB color model. It has a wide angle, reaching up to 140 0 . To improve the performance of this type of matrix, upgrades are being made to reduce the response time (H-IPS), increase the contrast level, expand the viewing angle and brightness (AFFS). Measures to improve IPS-matrices are regularly carried out by all popular equipment manufacturers.
The compromise MVA technology makes it possible to see deep blacks due to good contrast. The viewing angle here reaches 170 0 . Of the minuses, one can note the lack of detail in the shadows, which depends on the viewing angle and color balance.
Brightness and Contrast
Working with photos and images largely depends on these parameters. The first of these displays the amount of light emitted by the surface and the second is determined by the ratio between the maximum and minimum brightness, when viewed against a black and white background.
Advice. To check the brightness of the monitor declared in the passport, you should set the parameters to the maximum and evaluate the image. If, at the same time, there is a desire to reduce the value, then the margin of the brightness parameter can be considered sufficient.
What else to pay attention to
In addition to the main ones, there are no less important additional parameters:
- screen surface. It comes in matte or glossy. The first option is more comfortable for the eyes, does not form glare, but on such a monitor the image looks less bright. When working with a glossy surface, you have to strain your eyes more, reflecting objects interfere.
- Diagonal and resolution. Interdependent parameters. The larger the monitor, the higher the resolution should be. This approach also increases the cost of equipment, while an unnecessarily large screen is not required for photo processing. A screen of 24 (1920x1200) - 27 (2560x1440) inches can provide comfort in work.
The most favorable for working with photography are monitors with an IPS type matrix. It is she who provides the correct color reproduction. It is better to avoid cheap models with TN, PVA and MVA matrices. For indoor use, when the monitor is located near a window or other light sources, you should choose a screen with a matte finish. At the same time, if you need the maximum brightness of the picture and it is possible to adjust the illumination of the room, you can opt for glossy. The optimal monitor size is at least 24 inches.
Color gamut and number of colors are the most important indicators
Rating of popular models
ASUS VX239H
The 23-inch model, with excellent color reproduction, occupies a leading position in the ratings. Equipped with AH-IPS matrix, HDMI input, two speakers with a power of 1W. The 1.5 cm thick screen supports VividPixel and MHL technologies. It is very convenient and pleasing to the eye to work with graphic images, which is noted by photographers. As a bonus - quality work without delay, as well as the GamePlus function.
BenQ GW227OH
A high-quality screen with a diagonal of 21.5 and an A-MVA matrix. A device with a fairly wide view, characterized by high image contrast and improved white balance. There is an option to manually adjust the color rendering. This is convenient if you have to work in conditions of changing light sources (lamps with lamps different temperatures, sun). Comfort for the eyes long work provides special mode GW2270H.
BenQ BL2411PT
Versatile 24" model, well suited for a variety of applications, including imaging. Embedded IPS provides efficiency. Three video inputs are supported, including HDCP. There is an energy saving function, as well as a periodic reminder to give your eyes a rest. Working with photos is facilitated by good color reproduction, contrast, lack of glare and backlight flicker, as well as uniform blacks. Nice design is complemented by a risified, intuitive menu.
DELL U2515H
The model has established itself as one of the best options for photographers and designers. The clarity of the picture and the softness of the color reproduction are provided by the IPS matrix, as well as the semi-matte surface and protection against glare. peculiar this type Matrix light black, almost absent on this model. The diagonal of the model is 25 inches with a resolution of 2560x1440. Such parameters provide correct image scaling when working in photo and video editors. Functional stand allows you to adjust the position and angle of the monitor.
When choosing a monitor for regular work with images, it is important to pay attention to the type of matrix, screen diagonal and resolution, as well as brightness and contrast. Screens with a matte finish are more eye-friendly. You should not choose expensive overall models, a screen with a diagonal of 24 is enough. Before buying, it is better to test the monitor by adjusting the brightness and contrast settings.
How to choose a monitor for a photographer: video
Today we will talk about monitors suitable for working with photos. First we need to understand what parameters we are interested in and which ones, in principle, should be paid attention to. Basically, this is the type of matrix, size, aspect ratio and, in addition to everything, screen coverage, PWM, manufacturer, interfaces, price. We will also touch on calibration and the factor of different color display on monitors.
UPD: It is worth mentioning that this article is written primarily for people who understand that they need to change the monitor, but do not yet understand anything about it. It's more of a reminder plain language for a potential buyer of a monitor for working with photos. For advanced users or professionals, it will be of little information, because. has a small overview of the characteristics.
Matrix type: An Ips matrix is best suited for working with photos, since it displays colors well and has good angles review. There are several modifications of Ips matrices: S-Ips, H-IPS and others. These are all modifications of the usual Ips matrix, some are simpler, some are better. If you do not make money on a photo or your budget is limited, then you should not take a steam bath and choose a specific matrix. Just make sure there is ips. Well, if the budget allows you to choose a better monitor, then you should bother with Ips modifications.
Matrix Bitness: There are 6, 8, 10-bit. The more, the better the color and gradients are transmitted. Budget monitors usually have 6-bit and pseudo-8-bit. Pseudo-8-bit is when there is a 6-bit matrix and it emulates 8 bits, but in fact it is still 6 bits. If you need good quality and you don’t have a very small budget, then it’s better to watch 8 or 10. If you choose a completely budget monitor, then don’t worry and take any - there will most likely be pseudo-8-bit.
For reference:
6 bits - 262 thousand colors.
8 bit - 16 million colors.
10 bits - 1 billion colors.
Screen size: The best option is 24” or more. Even 22” is no longer such a comfortable size, your working area will still be smaller. The edges of the screen are usually eaten away by the interface of the program in which you work, be it Photoshop with its panels or any raw converter. If you want more (and space on the table allows), then take more - 27 "or 30".
Aspect Ratio: There are 2 options - this is 16:9 and 16:10. Most models on the market today are 16:9. But it is better to take 16:10, because you will have 1” screen more in height. Roughly speaking, you have more monitor. And its resolution will be normal 1920x1200, not cropped 1920x1080. To work with photos at 16:10 is really more convenient to work with. From the technical side, there is no difference, just a different size. It is worth noting that if the monitor is 27”, then there is only a 16:9 option. If 30”, then 16:10.
Screen coverage: Glossy or matte. Glossy - like a mirror. You see yourself in the reflection, and on a sunny day you see everything in front of the screen. It is a little more contrast and gives a richer picture. This is where the perks end. Matte does not glare, no reflections and other things. Now almost all 24” monitors with an aspect ratio of 16:10 and an Ips matrix do matte. This makes me happy.
PWM: is an abbreviation for Pulse Width Modulation. In simple terms, this is a flickering of the screen backlight (mostly noticeable at low brightness). Some people get tired of such monitors, and some do not even notice. You won’t know about this before buying, only after working for some long time behind the monitor. But most don't notice. I advise you not to bother on this point.
Manufacturer: This is a very interesting point. I may upset someone (lovers of stereotypes), but on the contrary, I will please someone. So. Now it doesn't matter who the manufacturer of the monitor is. almost all matrices are made by LG. There is a stereotype, for example, that only Dell and NEC are excellent, and the rest suck... But LG also makes matrices for both of them :) And even Apple she does. So the manufacturer can be anyone. Anyway, in 90% of cases you buy a matrix from LG. So it goes. It should be noted here that if you compare NEC for 50 tr. and some BenQ for 10 tr., then the difference, of course, will be noticeable. But this is not a question of the manufacturer, but a question of the price segment itself. It is clear that cheap and perfect does not happen.
Interfaces: Everything is simple here. The most popular are DVI and DisplayPort. VGA is already dying, HDMI is also fading into the background, because. more for TVs imprisoned than for monitors. Therefore, see what outputs you have on your video card and select the appropriate monitor.
Price: Depends on the width of your wallet. But the principle is standard, budget ones are worse, expensive ones are better. For example (very average) monitors up to 15 tr. These are all budget monitors. You should not expect ideal brightness gradients and a very cool matrix from them. Monitors of thousands from 15-20 - already middle segment, you can actually find a good option. Monitors of thousands from 35 and above - can be considered an expensive segment. There you can choose what is called, perfect option(as far as possible due to technical limitations). For most people working with photography, the budget segment will do. And if you are a professional photographer (I mean not just people who consider themselves to be such, but really professionals), then it is better to take a good monitor, because. in which case you will be responsible for your work to the customer (color / ladders and all other charms that can come out during printing).
Additional goodies: Usually this is a USB hub and the portrait mode of the monitor (when you can rotate the monitor to a vertical position). USB is a really handy thing. You can shove a webcam or some other small device you need there, and the wires will not be pulled from the system unit. Portrait mode is rarely needed. Those who really need it know this already. In other cases, it is practically not used.
And now let's talk about what you also need to know.
Calibration: Definitely needed. It is done so that all people who have monitors on an Ips matrix see the same color. We took a photo, sent it to a photo lab for printing - we got the printed material exactly as you saw it on your monitor. They gave it to the customer - he also sees exactly what you saw. Those. colors seem to be standardized and become correct (black is really black, gray is really gray, etc.). Even if you are not a professional, but bought a monitor on an Ips matrix, it is better to calibrate it once. If you are a pro, then you yourself probably know that it occasionally needs to be calibrated again.
Matrix features: Budget Ips matrices have such features as tint and glow.
Tint- this is when one side of the monitor can give a little bit in one color, and the other side in the other (purple / green). Can be localized anywhere, but usually closer to the edges. It is not treated in any way, because. iron problem. Just choose carefully when buying. Look at the pure gray color, white, - usually they are noticeable. If explicitly expressed, then ask for another copy.
Glow is when black is not completely black. For example, turn on the black screen screen saver and see that at certain angles the monitor seems to glow a little, i.e. not perfectly black. There is no cure, but it doesn't interfere either. You are not processing a 500*500 pixel image on a completely black background. Just know what it is, but don't even worry about it.
Expanded color gamut- in most cases it is not needed (interferes). And for calibration, it even causes extra hemorrhoids. But if you buy a monitor just for home, watch movies, play games, see pictures, then you can use it. The image will be a little clearer.
I have some colors on the monitor, and a friend (at work / customer, etc.) has different ones. Yes, this is the place to be, because. Everyone's monitors are different. Calibration partly solves this problem. But not only with you, but also on the second monitor. In 99% of cases this is not possible. You will not advise to calibrate monitors to each customer. And not everyone has a normal monitor on an Ips matrix. The vast majority of monitors on the TN matrix. These are the most budgetary monitors, at least calibrate them, at least not - you still can’t achieve correct colors. It will certainly get better, but it will still lie. Therefore, this problem cannot be solved in any way. And you should not even try to process somehow pictures with the expectation of that other monitor. These are all dances with a tambourine.
I honestly tried to make it short and succinct... but it turned out to be a lot of letters :) I touched even more than the average user needs. But information is never redundant.
If you have any other questions - ask.
PS: I have an HP LP2475w monitor (24”, 16:10, honest 8 bits).